Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I just love how left-wing losers who dropped out of high school can’t do basic math.I just love how Patirot wants everyone to pay the same but not earn the same...
No, does $8.50 an hour equal $75.00 and hour for work?And I just love how left-wing losers who dropped out of high school can’t do basic math.I just love how Patirot wants everyone to pay the same but not earn the same...
Snowflake...the total paid is bolded in blue (since you’re slow and too many numbers and symbols confuse you)
$5,000,000 x 10% = $500,000
$50,000 x 10% = $5,000
Now tell us...does $5,000 = $500,000?
Because it is immoral and unjust. You have no right to punish someone through taxes. And you have no right to burden one American more than another.why is paying more taxes on more than a certain amount, a problem?
There you, snowflake. No. Not it doesn’t. Therefore I do not advocate for everyone to “pay the same”. I advocate for everyone to share in the same percentage of burden. You just admitted your a liar. But don’t worry, everyone knew that already.No$5,000,000 x 10% = $500,000I just love how Patirot wants everyone to pay the same but not earn the same...
$50,000 x 10% = $5,000
Now tell us...does $5,000 = $500,000?
Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.Because it is immoral and unjust. You have no right to punish someone through taxes. And you have no right to burden one American more than another.why is paying more taxes on more than a certain amount, a problem?
All Americans are privileged with the same military, roads, courts, etc. so all should share in the burden. Mammaries is losing her shit because she loves being a parasite who mooches off of others. It’s sick.
Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.Because it is immoral and unjust. You have no right to punish someone through taxes. And you have no right to burden one American more than another.why is paying more taxes on more than a certain amount, a problem?
All Americans are privileged with the same military, roads, courts, etc. so all should share in the burden. Mammaries is losing her shit because she loves being a parasite who mooches off of others. It’s sick.
Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror only burden the People.
You're against retirement now? LOL what a goddamn idiot perfect chump of the greedy idiot rich.Hence the reason you demand that society pay your way and provide for you.I am happily retired, super duper.
Does he have any workers without it?
The rich guy gets far, far more back, thus he needs to pay more in. That's basic common sense and basic morality, so no wonder that the concept eludes you.
They only GET that business if their education and infrastructure and services are up to par..
Adam Smith, the founder of capitalism, strongly disagreed with you, and he endorsed progressive taxation. We liberals, of course, are the heirs of Adam Smith.Adam Smith, the founder of capitalism, strongly disagreed with you, and he endorsed progressive taxation. We liberals, of course, are the heirs of Adam Smith. Your brand of thinking is more like the Somalian government, or lack of it.
Yeah, Carl Marx thought the same thing. Our founders disagreed with both, they thought everyone should contribute to the government equally. Then along came the commiecrat regressives and they fucked up the whole thing.
.
To claim “economic equality is unjust” is a horrible understatement. Economic equality is flat out evil. Most people are taught as toddlers that it is not acceptable to take what doesn’t belong to you. And most people learn by elementary school that it is in poor taste to accept that which you didn’t earn.
Anyone who demands equal outcomes without first demanding equal effort, talent, abilities, hours, and most of all - results - is a monster. Person B shouldn’t work half as hard and half as long as Person A and still get the same compensation or lifestyle.Conservatives, classical liberals and libertarians celebrate the fact that people have unequal (or diverse) talents, preferences, risk averseness, attachments and cultures because these are the central element to the rich tapestry of an enlightened, humane and prosperous society. These differences will inevitably lead to economic differences. And those differences are not objectionable. Any political system that mandated economic equality would be unjust. It is unjust to treat unequal situations equally.
The bottom line - government has no authority to take from one and give to another. None. And no, the right to tax does not even remotely qualify. Taxes are to run the government. If you’re not a government employee, then taxes do not justify your income from a tax payer.Government should not enforce a pre-determined distribution of income or wealth. Individual effort, merit, preferences and values matter morally. An unplanned distribution is just if the distribution is the result of individuals acting freely in accordance with just rules.
*Quotes are taken from marketing material for upcoming economic lecture by David Burton - Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation
No one ever seriously thought supply side (voodoo) econmics would do what was claimed...least of all it's authorsSupply side economics has failed for the third time. It failed for Reagan, for Bush, and now for Trump.
The supply side crowd told us the economy would grow so fast, the tax cuts would pay for themselves, and revenue would actually rise.
It didn't happen. Revenue has cratered, even more than predicted.
At this stage, belief that supply side economics works is only found in cultists.
They only GET that business if their education and infrastructure and services are up to par..
Thank you for that example that proves my point so effectively.
The business requires the education and infrastructure, which someone else paid for. The business gets far more back from the taxes than the worker, so the business should pay in much more.
That's all fine. We dont want equal outcome. We are calling out the LUNACY of billionairism at the detriment of our people. It's not sustainable. Billionaires will take more and more of the economic output, and control our lives and government as well. Get it in your head bruh. This is like the gap between relativity and quantum mechanics. The massive scale of billionairism and its extraction of wealth from our society doesnt follow the same rules as your clever rehearsed parables about equal outcome. And it shouldnt follow the same policy. We have to find a way to reverse this dependence and shift the income growth back down the distribution. Not to me. It could be just down to the millionaires and still be exponentially better for our economy.To claim “economic equality is unjust” is a horrible understatement. Economic equality is flat out evil. Most people are taught as toddlers that it is not acceptable to take what doesn’t belong to you. And most people learn by elementary school that it is in poor taste to accept that which you didn’t earn.
Anyone who demands equal outcomes without first demanding equal effort, talent, abilities, hours, and most of all - results - is a monster. Person B shouldn’t work half as hard and half as long as Person A and still get the same compensation or lifestyle.Conservatives, classical liberals and libertarians celebrate the fact that people have unequal (or diverse) talents, preferences, risk averseness, attachments and cultures because these are the central element to the rich tapestry of an enlightened, humane and prosperous society. These differences will inevitably lead to economic differences. And those differences are not objectionable. Any political system that mandated economic equality would be unjust. It is unjust to treat unequal situations equally.
The bottom line - government has no authority to take from one and give to another. None. And no, the right to tax does not even remotely qualify. Taxes are to run the government. If you’re not a government employee, then taxes do not justify your income from a tax payer.Government should not enforce a pre-determined distribution of income or wealth. Individual effort, merit, preferences and values matter morally. An unplanned distribution is just if the distribution is the result of individuals acting freely in accordance with just rules.
*Quotes are taken from marketing material for upcoming economic lecture by David Burton - Senior Fellow, Economic Policy, Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation
No no. It's not theft to stop throwing all of our money away at the billionaires. That's unsustainable. Try using your brain and thinking through the problem for yourself rather regurgitating the same old false con garbage.Dem's are teaching their masses that not only is it okay to steal from others, they are ENTITLED to steal from others.
