Economic Good News.....288,000 jobs added in April

[bedowin62]

288,000 jobs added last month

I thought Obamacare was going to kill employment?

it is
remember leftard your own Messiah delayed a huge portion of it for another 2 YEARS?

 

[bedowin62]

288,000 jobs added last month

I thought Obamacare was going to kill employment?

it is
remember leftard your own Messiah delayed a huge portion of it for another 2 YEARS?

oh and that CBO you left-wing losers insisted was the Gospel on obamacare when you were feeding them lies to score; says it OBAMACARE WILL COST JOBS; about a million of them.


what? you dont like them now?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Economy adds 288,000 jobs; jobless rate, 6.3%

Employers added 288,000 jobs in April as milder weather continued to lift the labor market from a winter slump.

The unemployment rate fell to 6.3% from 6.7% -- the biggest drop since September 2008, the Labor Department said Friday.

Many economists expect the economy and job market to accelerate this year because of higher household wealth and reduced debt, as well as more modest federal government spending cuts

there are fewer Americans with jobs in obama's sixth year than at the height of the "Bush" recession


true story

libs are losers who lie to themselves

In fact these numbers are even more remarkable in light of republican efforts to derail the recovery.

 

[bedowin62]

sorry leftardz; record numbers of ABLE-BODIED, WORKING-AGE Americans arent taking part in the labor force. that has ZERO to do with retiring baby boomers

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

Economy adds 288,000 jobs; jobless rate, 6.3%

Employers added 288,000 jobs in April as milder weather continued to lift the labor market from a winter slump.

The unemployment rate fell to 6.3% from 6.7% -- the biggest drop since September 2008, the Labor Department said Friday.

Many economists expect the economy and job market to accelerate this year because of higher household wealth and reduced debt, as well as more modest federal government spending cuts

there are fewer Americans with jobs in obama's sixth year than at the height of the "Bush" recession


true story

libs are losers who lie to themselves

In fact these numbers are even more remarkable in light of republican efforts to derail the recovery.

lol!!




"derail the recovery?

so you're saying you didnt get the "jobs bills" you wanted/
and you claim real job growth is happening?


shouldnt you be thanking "obstructing" Repubs than for saving the hundreds of billions you wanted to spend than idiot?

or do you just want to spend money we dont have just to spend it?
ready to admit you were wrong?

 

[blackhawk]

The labor participation rate is also at its worst in thirty years according to the same report. There is good news as well but overall the economy is still weak.

 

[edthecynic]

The labor participation rate is also at its worst in thirty years according to the same report. There is good news as well but overall the economy is still weak.

The LPR would be the same no matter who was president during the Boomers retirement. Funny how the steadily declining LPR was not worth a mention during the Bush Regime, and he didn't have Boomers retiring!!!

 

[bedowin62]

let's recap:

isnt it the idiotic Left saying Republicans try to "derail the recovery' and "obstruct"?

didnt left-wing losers whine they didnt get their "jobs bills"?

didnt left-wing nutjobs remind us obama CUT TAXES in his Stimulus bill?
didnt obama make NINETY-EIGHT PERCENT of the Bush TAX CUTS PERMANENT?


yet you clown still insist it was YOUR policies that created jobs?

where are the 3 MILLION "green jobs "obama promised?
or the 400,000 jobs nancy pelosi said would be created "immediately" just by signing the ACA into law?

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

The labor participation rate is also at its worst in thirty years according to the same report. There is good news as well but overall the economy is still weak.

The LPR would be the same no matter who was president during the Boomers retirement. Funny how the steadily declining LPR was not worth a mention during the Bush Regime, and he didn't have Boomers retiring!!!

the LPR is at a FORTY YEAR LOW
that mean it hasnt been this low in forty years for you left-wing losers.

it isnt explained by retiring baby boomers no matter how much a butt-hurt left-wing loser doesnt want to admit PROGRESSIVE FAILURE

 

[bedowin62]

the left-wingers here are intellectual cowards.

it has been repeatedly shown that retiring baby boomers are not a significant part of the 40-year low labor market participation rate under obama; especially since huge numbers of those "retiring" baby boomers are in fact NOT RETIRING BUT STAYING IN THE LABOR FORCE.

further is has been shown that a LARGER part of the low labor market participation rate is ALBE-BODIED, WORKING -AGE; let me say it again; WORKING-AGE Americans are not participating in the Labor Market

libs are losers who lie TO THEMSELVES

 

[edthecynic]

the left-wingers here are intellectual cowards.

it has been repeatedly shown that retiring baby boomers are not a significant part of the 40-year low labor market participation rate under obama; especially since huge numbers of those "retiring" baby boomers are in fact NOT RETIRING BUT STAYING IN THE LABOR FORCE.

further is has been shown that a LARGER part of the low labor market participation rate is ALBE-BODIED, WORKING -AGE; let me say it again; WORKING-AGE Americans are not participating in the Labor Market

libs are losers who lie TO THEMSELVES

If a 2.5% increase is a "huge number" then the 82% of Boomers retiring by age 65 must be super colossal!!!

 

[bedowin62]

YOU KNOW what's funny about the losers lying to themselves here?
i bet at least some of them know people that are at retirement age and still IN THE LABOR MARKET.
like their own mothers and fathers maybe?

also i bet they know, or know of; people of WORKING AGE; that are ABLE-BODIED but still DONT participate in the Labor Market

 

[bedowin62]

the left-wingers here are intellectual cowards.

it has been repeatedly shown that retiring baby boomers are not a significant part of the 40-year low labor market participation rate under obama; especially since huge numbers of those "retiring" baby boomers are in fact NOT RETIRING BUT STAYING IN THE LABOR FORCE.

further is has been shown that a LARGER part of the low labor market participation rate is ALBE-BODIED, WORKING -AGE; let me say it again; WORKING-AGE Americans are not participating in the Labor Market

libs are losers who lie TO THEMSELVES

If a 2.5% increase is a "huge number" then the 82% of Boomers retiring by age 65 must be super colossal!!!

no matter how much you insist on making a fool of yourself here; it has already been pointed out to you that the low rate of labor market participation has more to do with RECORD NUMBERS OF ABLE-BODIED, WORKING AGE AMERICANS not participatin


a real adult would give up by now

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

.

Very good news, all things considered.

If we can string together a few 250,000+ figures we may have the momentum we need.

.

Yup, I just wish the new housing market would pick up more. We've got an unnatural slump going on right now.

 

[Yurt]

Economy adds 288,000 jobs; jobless rate, 6.3%

Employers added 288,000 jobs in April as milder weather continued to lift the labor market from a winter slump.

The unemployment rate fell to 6.3% from 6.7% -- the biggest drop since September 2008, the Labor Department said Friday.

Many economists expect the economy and job market to accelerate this year because of higher household wealth and reduced debt, as well as more modest federal government spending cuts

all thanks to bush's economic policies...right?

 

[edthecynic]

The labor participation rate is also at its worst in thirty years according to the same report. There is good news as well but overall the economy is still weak.

The LPR would be the same no matter who was president during the Boomers retirement. Funny how the steadily declining LPR was not worth a mention during the Bush Regime, and he didn't have Boomers retiring!!!

the LPR is at a FORTY YEAR LOW
that mean it hasnt been this low in forty years for you left-wing losers.

it isnt explained by retiring baby boomers no matter how much a butt-hurt left-wing loser doesnt want to admit PROGRESSIVE FAILURE

Yeah, 3 million 65 year old Boomers retiring each year has no effect but half a million Boomers staying in the workforce after 65 is "huge."

 

[NYcarbineer]

let's recap:

isnt it the idiotic Left saying Republicans try to "derail the recovery' and "obstruct"?

didnt left-wing losers whine they didnt get their "jobs bills"?

didnt left-wing nutjobs remind us obama CUT TAXES in his Stimulus bill?
didnt obama make NINETY-EIGHT PERCENT of the Bush TAX CUTS PERMANENT?


yet you clown still insist it was YOUR policies that created jobs?

where are the 3 MILLION "green jobs "obama promised?
or the 400,000 jobs nancy pelosi said would be created "immediately" just by signing the ACA into law?

libs are losers who lie to themselves

So you're admitting that the jobs situation that you repeatedly have referred to as BAD is happening NOT because of Obama's policies,

but is happening with most of Bush's policies in place?

lol, you are a confused man, or whatever passes for a man where you're from.

 

[edthecynic]

the left-wingers here are intellectual cowards.

it has been repeatedly shown that retiring baby boomers are not a significant part of the 40-year low labor market participation rate under obama; especially since huge numbers of those "retiring" baby boomers are in fact NOT RETIRING BUT STAYING IN THE LABOR FORCE.

further is has been shown that a LARGER part of the low labor market participation rate is ALBE-BODIED, WORKING -AGE; let me say it again; WORKING-AGE Americans are not participating in the Labor Market

libs are losers who lie TO THEMSELVES

If a 2.5% increase is a "huge number" then the 82% of Boomers retiring by age 65 must be super colossal!!!

no matter how much you insist on making a fool of yourself here; it has already been pointed out to you that the low rate of labor market participation has more to do with RECORD NUMBERS OF ABLE-BODIED, WORKING AGE AMERICANS not participatin


a real adult would give up by now

You have proved no such thing, retirees are not required to work until they die no matter how able-bodied they are. You are claiming that a 2.5% increase in Boomers working past 65 is more significant than 82% of Boomers retiring by age 65.

 

[bedowin62]

hilarious really; not hard to see why you wont even touch the subject of able-bodied and working-age Americans not working.

you are the kind of moron wont to rant about the job creators not creating jobs.
but now that you want to brag about the job creation that talking point is no longer available

so you are left to explain why so many WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED Americans arent participating in the Labor Force.

it cant have anything to do with the RECORD NUMBERS ON WELFARE NOW CAN IT?

you're a JOKE

 

[bedowin62]

let's recap:

isnt it the idiotic Left saying Republicans try to "derail the recovery' and "obstruct"?

didnt left-wing losers whine they didnt get their "jobs bills"?

didnt left-wing nutjobs remind us obama CUT TAXES in his Stimulus bill?
didnt obama make NINETY-EIGHT PERCENT of the Bush TAX CUTS PERMANENT?


yet you clown still insist it was YOUR policies that created jobs?

where are the 3 MILLION "green jobs "obama promised?
or the 400,000 jobs nancy pelosi said would be created "immediately" just by signing the ACA into law?

libs are losers who lie to themselves

So you're admitting that the jobs situation that you repeatedly have referred to as BAD is happening NOT because of Obama's policies,

but is happening with most of Bush's policies in place?

lol, you are a confused man, or whatever passes for a man where you're from.

NO LEFTARD;
i'm saying things are still bad; and you are hyping a small gain into something it isnt

furthermore you cant admit it has more to do with the strength of the American economy IN SPITE OF failed progressive policies than because of them

nice try to make me look like i contradicted my self here. but you just arent smart enough to understand