Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The great depression was repaired by policies of FDR.
That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Gee...."shocking" results. Nobody would've seen this coming
View attachment 77067
Best-run States Are Heavily Republican, Study Finds
Since you are posting, we saw it all coming. Because:Gee...."shocking" results. Nobody would've seen this coming
View attachment 77067
Best-run States Are Heavily Republican, Study Finds
1. You are a con tool.
2. You love posting stuff from dip shit crazy con web sites.
3. Glen beck"s site is close to the top of the bat shit crazy con web sites.
4. So, you posted bullshit. Which is completely normal for you. Dipshit.
Have you any idea how stupid you appear, quoting Glen Beck. Dude is from the town I live in, and is considered a total untruthful nut case. Kind of like you.
Gee...."shocking" results. Nobody would've seen this coming
Best-run States Are Heavily Republican, Study Finds
Since you are posting, we saw it all coming. Because:
1. You are a con tool.
2. You love posting stuff from dip shit crazy con web sites.
3. Glen beck"s site is close to the top of the bat shit crazy con web sites.
4. So, you posted bullshit. Which is completely normal for you. Dipshit.
Have you any idea how stupid you appear, quoting Glen Beck. Dude is from the town I live in, and is considered a total untruthful nut case. Kind of like you.
http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/06/01/best-run-states-are-heavily-republican-study-finds/Gee...."shocking" results. Nobody would've seen this coming
View attachment 77067
Best-run States Are Heavily Republican, Study Finds
Since you are posting, we saw it all coming. Because:
1. You are a con tool.
2. You love posting stuff from dip shit crazy con web sites.
3. Glen beck"s site is close to the top of the bat shit crazy con web sites.
4. So, you posted bullshit. Which is completely normal for you. Dipshit.
Have you any idea how stupid you appear, quoting Glen Beck. Dude is from the town I live in, and is considered a total untruthful nut case. Kind of like you.
That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
Finally, history has proven that nothing he did worked. He created and prolonged the Great Depression with his unconstitutional policies.
OMG! A Free Market site touts a Free Market? No WAY!Gee...."shocking" results. Nobody would've seen this coming
View attachment 77103
Best-run States Are Heavily Republican, Study Finds
Since you are posting, we saw it all coming. Because:
1. You are a con tool.
2. You love posting stuff from dip shit crazy con web sites.
3. Glen beck"s site is close to the top of the bat shit crazy con web sites.
4. So, you posted bullshit. Which is completely normal for you. Dipshit.
Have you any idea how stupid you appear, quoting Glen Beck. Dude is from the town I live in, and is considered a total untruthful nut case. Kind of like you.
Hahahaha! One small problem junior....this wasn't from Glenn Beck. If you had clicked the link and read the story properly you would've seen that Glenn was simply reporting on the story that was from Investors.com. Oops....
Thank you for illustrating to everyone how ignorant, lazy, and partisan you are. Here is the link that Glenn had in his story: Best-Run States Are Heavily Republican, Study Finds
That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
Finally, history has proven that nothing he did worked. He created and prolonged the Great Depression with his unconstitutional policies.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security. As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
How did history proved nothing FDR worked?
It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security.
As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
Really? You know (and I quote) "an endless array" or Republican's who said they would've starved to death? So that equals in real numbers - what - half a dozen people? At most? Well, the unrestrained government of the U.S.S.R. under Joseph Stalin saw tens of millions intentionally starved to death. So....any rational person (that immediately excludes you) would conclude that it is better to have a free nation that sees a few dozen starve because of their incompetence than a nanny state that intentionally starves tens of millions.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
Finally, history has proven that nothing he did worked. He created and prolonged the Great Depression with his unconstitutional policies.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security. As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
FDR BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Same old CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation Bullshit.
That's why I know an endless array of Republicans in their 70s who said they would have starved to death if not for FDR.
Really? You know (and I quote) "an endless array" or Republican's who said they would've starved to death? So that equals in real numbers - what - half a dozen people? At most? Well, the unrestrained government of the U.S.S.R. under Joseph Stalin saw tens of millions intentionally starved to death. So....any rational person (that immediately excludes you) would conclude that it is better to have a free nation that sees a few dozen starve because of their incompetence than a nanny state that intentionally starves tens of millions.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
Finally, history has proven that nothing he did worked. He created and prolonged the Great Depression with his unconstitutional policies.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security. As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
FDR BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Same old CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation Bullshit.
That's why I know an endless array of Republicans in their 70s who said they would have starved to death if not for FDR.
Incidentally - how incompetent were these people that they couldn't even feed themselves without FDR? What moron doesn't know how to plant a garden? What idiot can't kill a deer or other wild animal for a meal? God Almighty...
Bwahahahaha! People didn't know how to plant a garden or hunt in the early 20th Century? I would submit that everyone knew exponentially better how to back then than they do today. Oh wait....you're an idiot libtard. Which means you're completely ignorant of history. And facts. And reality.Really? You know (and I quote) "an endless array" or Republican's who said they would've starved to death? So that equals in real numbers - what - half a dozen people? At most? Well, the unrestrained government of the U.S.S.R. under Joseph Stalin saw tens of millions intentionally starved to death. So....any rational person (that immediately excludes you) would conclude that it is better to have a free nation that sees a few dozen starve because of their incompetence than a nanny state that intentionally starves tens of millions.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.Of course, how simple it was in the old days, just wait out a depression. Hoover sort of waited it out for four years and the American people were getting restless. Even some governments were overturned.
When FDR ran for office, he said he would not wait it out, he would experiment, try things and the people elected him, and try things is what he did. True, not everything worked, but the people knew he was trying. The people elected FDR four times in a row, historians have named FDR, America's greatest president.
Would the American people today wait four years, with hungry kids going through garbage cans, no health care, no jobs waiting for a Great Depression to cure itself or would they demand the government do something?
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
Finally, history has proven that nothing he did worked. He created and prolonged the Great Depression with his unconstitutional policies.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security. As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
FDR BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Same old CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation Bullshit.
That's why I know an endless array of Republicans in their 70s who said they would have starved to death if not for FDR.
Incidentally - how incompetent were these people that they couldn't even feed themselves without FDR? What moron doesn't know how to plant a garden? What idiot can't kill a deer or other wild animal for a meal? God Almighty...
So the idiot P@triot is comparing the early 20th Century to today.
Are you seriously that stupid?
Yes, you are.
Bwahahahaha! People didn't know how to plant a garden or hunt in the early 20th Century? I would submit that everyone knew exponentially better how to back then than they do today. Oh wait....you're an idiot libtard. Which means you're completely ignorant of history. And facts. And reality.Really? You know (and I quote) "an endless array" or Republican's who said they would've starved to death? So that equals in real numbers - what - half a dozen people? At most? Well, the unrestrained government of the U.S.S.R. under Joseph Stalin saw tens of millions intentionally starved to death. So....any rational person (that immediately excludes you) would conclude that it is better to have a free nation that sees a few dozen starve because of their incompetence than a nanny state that intentionally starves tens of millions.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.That is a whole lot of nonsense. The federal government has 18 enumerated powers and "trying stuff" to end a depression is not one of them. So the fire thing you just did with your post was establish that FDR was a dirt-bag who violated the U.S. Constitution in a huge way.
Second, mentioning that FDR was elected four times only goes to further prove what a dirt-bag the guy was. Any sitting president in history would've been elected over and over and over simply on name recognition and reverence due to the office alone. But George Washington set the tone as the first president of the United States when he refused to run a third time. Subsequently, every president that followed his precedence and respected that gesture. Until the power-hungry idiot FDR.
Finally, history has proven that nothing he did worked. He created and prolonged the Great Depression with his unconstitutional policies.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security. As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
FDR BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Same old CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation Bullshit.
That's why I know an endless array of Republicans in their 70s who said they would have starved to death if not for FDR.
Incidentally - how incompetent were these people that they couldn't even feed themselves without FDR? What moron doesn't know how to plant a garden? What idiot can't kill a deer or other wild animal for a meal? God Almighty...
So the idiot P@triot is comparing the early 20th Century to today.
Are you seriously that stupid?
Yes, you are.
And what does any of that have to do with being able to feed themselves?!? Would you like to try again junior? This time without the nonsensical redirect to items that have nothing to do with the topic at hand?Bwahahahaha! People didn't know how to plant a garden or hunt in the early 20th Century? I would submit that everyone knew exponentially better how to back then than they do today. Oh wait....you're an idiot libtard. Which means you're completely ignorant of history. And facts. And reality.Really? You know (and I quote) "an endless array" or Republican's who said they would've starved to death? So that equals in real numbers - what - half a dozen people? At most? Well, the unrestrained government of the U.S.S.R. under Joseph Stalin saw tens of millions intentionally starved to death. So....any rational person (that immediately excludes you) would conclude that it is better to have a free nation that sees a few dozen starve because of their incompetence than a nanny state that intentionally starves tens of millions.How did history proved nothing FDR worked? It is the best historians in the nation that named FDR the greatest American president.
If FDR violated the Constitution he could be called on it and was. FDR did many things that worked, to name just one, Social Security. As for running for a third term if the people believed that to be wrong the people didn't have to vote for him, but they did, and then for still another term. FDR ran and the people voted so what did they violate-a gesture by Washington, did the people have that right?
FDR BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Same old CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation Bullshit.
That's why I know an endless array of Republicans in their 70s who said they would have starved to death if not for FDR.
Incidentally - how incompetent were these people that they couldn't even feed themselves without FDR? What moron doesn't know how to plant a garden? What idiot can't kill a deer or other wild animal for a meal? God Almighty...
So the idiot P@triot is comparing the early 20th Century to today.
Are you seriously that stupid?
Yes, you are.
Please elaborate on these features of life in the early 20th century...
The number of hours per work day.
The number of hours per work week.
Environmental control in factories.
Health care.
Number of Sick Days.
Vacations.
Worker's rights when they didn't get paid; you may include the business owner calling in the National Guard to main and kill workers.
Relocation opportunity.
Refrigeration.
Working outside regardless of weather.
How many men died building Bridges?
How many men died building Tunnels?
How many men died building Roads?
Wasn't the pre-FDR, Robber Baron scumbag era just dandy?.
Feeling stupid yet?
Of course not, because you're too stupid to realize you're stupid.
And what does any of that have to do with being able to feed themselves?!? Would you like to try again junior? This time without the nonsensical redirect to items that have nothing to do with the topic at hand?Bwahahahaha! People didn't know how to plant a garden or hunt in the early 20th Century? I would submit that everyone knew exponentially better how to back then than they do today. Oh wait....you're an idiot libtard. Which means you're completely ignorant of history. And facts. And reality.Really? You know (and I quote) "an endless array" or Republican's who said they would've starved to death? So that equals in real numbers - what - half a dozen people? At most? Well, the unrestrained government of the U.S.S.R. under Joseph Stalin saw tens of millions intentionally starved to death. So....any rational person (that immediately excludes you) would conclude that it is better to have a free nation that sees a few dozen starve because of their incompetence than a nanny state that intentionally starves tens of millions.FDR BADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!
Same old CATO Institute and Heritage Foundation Bullshit.
That's why I know an endless array of Republicans in their 70s who said they would have starved to death if not for FDR.
Incidentally - how incompetent were these people that they couldn't even feed themselves without FDR? What moron doesn't know how to plant a garden? What idiot can't kill a deer or other wild animal for a meal? God Almighty...
So the idiot P@triot is comparing the early 20th Century to today.
Are you seriously that stupid?
Yes, you are.
Please elaborate on these features of life in the early 20th century...
The number of hours per work day.
The number of hours per work week.
Environmental control in factories.
Health care.
Number of Sick Days.
Vacations.
Worker's rights when they didn't get paid; you may include the business owner calling in the National Guard to main and kill workers.
Relocation opportunity.
Refrigeration.
Working outside regardless of weather.
How many men died building Bridges?
How many men died building Tunnels?
How many men died building Roads?
Wasn't the pre-FDR, Robber Baron scumbag era just dandy?.
Feeling stupid yet?
Of course not, because you're too stupid to realize you're stupid.
When you get your ass kicked with logic, you just go off on a tangent about items that have nothing to do with the issue.
Since 1948 FDR has been rated by America's most noted historians as one of the top three American presidents, and recently as the number one. Conservative historians still rated FDR in the top three. As for FDR welfare, if you were able-you worked. For the kids on the road FDR implemented the CCC, a 3C got thirty a month and sent home 25.
Wasn't the pre-FDR, Robber Baron scumbag era just dandy?.
