Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[otto105]

Did they try to overthrow the government? That’s a yes or no, Simp.

Yes

 

[Hutch Starskey]

There’s no way the SCOTUS will let this go through. To do so would destroy the election system by which voters pick whom they prefer for presidentl

Only for future insurrectionists.

 

[Slade3200]

They decided he was an insurrectionist without him being charged or convicted for it. It‘s based on the opinion of a few Dems. And based on the split, that means that ONE Democrat decided to disenfranchise millions of Republicans.

This was not the intention of the 14th, and it will be overturned.

That’s how our legal system works. You did not make an argument for how it was unconstitutional. Consider everybody else who has been disqualified for office went through a similar process and not one was convicted or charged for insurrection.

Want to try again to make an argument about how the CO decision violates the constitution

 

[Lisa558]

Only for future insurrectionists.

There was no insurrection.

 

[Robert W]

There’s no way the SCOTUS will let this go through. To do so would destroy the election system by which voters pick whom they prefer for president!

It is tough enough to pin insurrection on the protestors but trying to do it to Trump is nuts. First he had the duty as president to ensure a fair election. And in his judgement it was not fair. I agree with Trump.

Now this has not been done by the Democrats. So from the Department of Justice, lets all read how many protesters were charged for this alleged insurrection? See if you can locate the word insurrection.

Criminal charges:

• Approximately 350 defendants have been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers or employees, including approximately 110 individuals who have been charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury to an officer.
  • Approximately 140 police officers were assaulted Jan. 6 at the Capitol, including about 80 from the U.S. Capitol Police and about 60 from the Metropolitan Police Department.
• Approximately 11 individuals have been arrested on a series of charges that relate to assaulting a member of the media, or destroying their equipment, on Jan. 6.
• Approximately 935 defendants have been charged with entering or remaining in a restricted federal building or grounds. Of those, 103 defendants have been charged with entering a restricted area with a dangerous or deadly weapon.
• Approximately 61 defendants have been charged with destruction of government property, and approximately 49 defendants have been charged with theft of government property.
• More than 310 defendants have been charged with corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so.
• Approximately 55 defendants have been charged with conspiracy, either: (a) conspiracy to obstruct a congressional proceeding, (b) conspiracy to obstruct law enforcement during a civil disorder, (c) conspiracy to injure an officer, or (d) some combination of the three.

 

[Lisa558]

That’s how our legal system works. You did not make an argument for how it was unconstitutional. Consider everybody else who has been disqualified for office went through a similar process and not one was convicted or charged for insurrection.

Want to try again to make an argument about how the CO decision violates the constitution

It’s unconstitutional to deprive millions of voters their vote, and a man eligible for the presidency from running, because four Democrat judges OPINE that he’s an insurrectionist when that was never established in court, or in Congress.

 

[Curried Goats]

There’s no way the SCOTUS will let this go through. To do so would destroy the election system by which voters pick whom they prefer for presidentl

Then you didn't read the ruling. That argument was soundly defeated. They pointed out that qualification challenges happen all the time and that without them there'd be no recourse to keep children or non citizens off the ballot. Either there are standards for who gets to run and assume the Presidency, with the ability to enforce those standards or there aren't any.

 

[otto105]

There was no insurrection.

Hang Mike pence


Hang Mike pence

Hang Mike pence

 

[Curried Goats]

It’s unconstitutional to deprive millions of voters their vote, and a man eligible for the presidency from running, because four Democrat judges OPINE that he’s an insurrectionist when that was never established in court, or in Congress.

Are you denied your vote when a Mexican national is denied ballot access?

 

[Lisa558]

It is tough enough to pin insurrection on the protestors but trying to do it to Trump is nuts. First he had the duty as president to ensure a fair election. And in his judgement it was not fair. I agree with Trump.

Now this has not been done by the Democrats. So from the Department of Justice, lets all read how many protesters were charged for this alleged insurrection? See if you can locate the word insurrection.

Criminal charges:

• Approximately 350 defendants have been charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers or employees, including approximately 110 individuals who have been charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury to an officer.
  • Approximately 140 police officers were assaulted Jan. 6 at the Capitol, including about 80 from the U.S. Capitol Police and about 60 from the Metropolitan Police Department.
• Approximately 11 individuals have been arrested on a series of charges that relate to assaulting a member of the media, or destroying their equipment, on Jan. 6.
• Approximately 935 defendants have been charged with entering or remaining in a restricted federal building or grounds. Of those, 103 defendants have been charged with entering a restricted area with a dangerous or deadly weapon.
• Approximately 61 defendants have been charged with destruction of government property, and approximately 49 defendants have been charged with theft of government property.
• More than 310 defendants have been charged with corruptly obstructing, influencing, or impeding an official proceeding, or attempting to do so.
• Approximately 55 defendants have been charged with conspiracy, either: (a) conspiracy to obstruct a congressional proceeding, (b) conspiracy to obstruct law enforcement during a civil disorder, (c) conspiracy to injure an officer, or (d) some combination of the three.

1) I agree with Trump as well. It is the duty of the president to ensure a fair election, and the 2020 one was fraught with anomalies and statistical impossibilities.

2) Yes, the Dems have applied a terrible double standard to the 1/6 protestors. Where are all the arrests when Code Pink leftists break into a Congressional hearing and start screeching, as just one example.

3) I notice in that list of arrests that nobody was charged with insurrection. That’s because there wasn’t one. And thus Trump cannot be called an insurrectionist.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If insurrection is so undeniable, then why wasn’t Trump charged, tried, and convicted for it?

And no, an opinion by biased Dem judges does not constitute a trial.

They are liars. As if that group of protesters had control of the entire military and government.

This whole thing is nothing more than the deep state going after Trump.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If insurrection is so undeniable, then why wasn’t Trump charged, tried, and convicted for it?

And no, an opinion by biased Dem judges does not constitute a trial.

Whether or not he was charged with it is irrelevant.
There had to have been a trial in order for there to have been a ruling.
Trump appealed that ruling to the CO district court where the finding that he engaged in insurrection was upheld but that the 14th didn’t apply.
It was then appealed to the CO SC who upheld that Trump engaged in insurrection and the 14th did indeed apply. Trump was found to be ineligible to be on the ballot.

So… not only was there a trial but three separate courts in CO held that Trump engaged in insurrection.

 

[otto105]

1) I agree with Trump as well. It is the duty of the president to ensure a fair election, and the 2020 one was fraught with anomalies and statistical impossibilities.

2) Yes, the Dems have applied a terrible double standard to the 1/6 protestors. Where are all the arrests when Code Pink leftists break into a Congressional hearing and start screeching, as just one example.

3) I notice in that list of arrests that nobody was charged with insurrection. That’s because there wasn’t one. And thus Trump cannot be called an insurrectionist.

1) Where is the proof

2) Those fuckup came because the orange fuckup requested.

3) He just did become one

 

[otto105]

They are liars. As if that group of protesters had control of the entire military and government.

This whole thing is nothing more than the deep state going after Trump.

Fuckup sycophancy at it best.

Now go kiss the ring anus

 

[ColonelAngus]

Hang Mike pence


Hang Mike pence

Hang Mike pence

Trump did that? Link?

 

[Lisa558]

Watch the meltdown from these leftist freaks when the SCOTUS rules that CO’s action was unconstitutional - and the Republicans of the state actually get to vote for whom they want!

 

[Lisa558]

Fuckup sycophancy at it best.

Now go kiss the ring anus

Running out of ways to defend the indefensible, I see.

 

[Lisa558]

Trump did that? Link?

Not only didn’t he do that, he didn’t say to do it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He should be removed for not securing the southern border.

Add it to your articles of impeachment. If your boys ever get there anyway.

 

[Slade3200]

It’s unconstitutional to deprive millions of voters their vote, and a man eligible for the presidency from running, because four Democrat judges OPINE that he’s an insurrectionist when that was never established in court, or in Congress.

You’re just making stuff up. That’s not a constitutional argument. What’s being violated here? Be specific. Because the constitution and past precedent don’t require a charge or conviction of insurrection in court

If somebody is in violation of the standards set forth by the constitution then that’s just how it is.