Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Faun]

Does someone have to be charged as an insurrectionists to be an insurrectionists?

History says .... no.

 

[Faun]

No insurrection took place. No one has been charged or convicted of insurrection. How fucking stupid are you?

Convictions aren't needed for disqualifying a candidate from holding public office.

Of course, I'm telling that to an illiterate imbecile, so there's little hope this lesson will stick.

 

[otto105]

What you are admitting to is Trump and his followers were upset that the election was handled wrongly by democrats. Insurrections are against a current Government. Trump did not want to overthrow his own government.

You should reply to my questions when you want me or others to reply to what you claim.

What you saw on TV is a case of you were not basing your views on legal laws.

Handled wrongly? How so? What is your evidence to convince anyone that you’re not just fuckup bob.

The humper wanted to use J6 to install himself as president against an election that he lost.

So, you can stop lying bob. I’m not one of your old white sycophant buddies who accept your shit.

 

[scruffy]

This is a Constitutional issue. Trump encouraging the riot is taken as fact.

Only by dumbass lying libtard sheeple.

 

[scruffy]

Nope. You ARE a moron and Trump has been ruled as someone who aided and abetted insurrection

The "ruling" is worthless.

So sad for you. All hopeful and shit.

Oh well... don't say you weren't warned

 

[Faun]

Says you. You're irrelevant.

None for Trump. Sucks, huh.

LOL

Keep denying how your own posts paint you. That's funny. And no, that doesn't suck. 3 courts found him culpable.

 

[BS Filter]

Convictions aren't needed for disqualifying a candidate from holding public office.

Of course, I'm telling that to an illiterate imbecile, so there's little hope this lesson will stick.

Trump has no disqualifications. You're stupid.

 

[Lesh]

The "ruling" is worthless.

So sad for you. All hopeful and shit.

Oh well... don't say you weren't warned

It actually has the force of law for the moment

Sucks to be you

 

[Lesh]

Less than the number of cops and property hurt and damaged by BLM mostly peaceful protests.

Irrelevant.

I asked how YOU would characterize the attack on the Capitol on Jan 6

Not how someone else characterized something else

 

[scruffy]

Not the issue and not the question

Why can’t you assholes answer directly?

The problem is you're a lying leftard hypocrite.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Very relevant you dope. You can’t say Trump is an insurrectionist without any charges of that. Because there was no insurrection and SCOTUS is going to make you and the other lefatrds here cry again.

The charge was made by the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

 

[scruffy]

It actually has the force of law for the moment

Sucks to be you

lmao

Good luck with that.

 

[Lesh]

The problem is you're a lying leftard hypocrite.

I didn’t think you’d even try to respond

I was correct as usual

 

[Faun]

The "ruling" is worthless.

So sad for you. All hopeful and shit.

Oh well... don't say you weren't warned

LOL

The ruling stands until otherwise overruled. It's currently on a stay until the SCOTUS decides to here the case and overturn it. Otherwise, it stands.

 

[Hollie]

No, but then I also never asserted any such thing.

How can you insist there was an insurrection, when there were no such charges brought against any individual and no court convictions of any individual for such a charge?

Why do you make such buffoonish claims?

 

[BS Filter]

Irrelevant.

I asked how YOU would characterize the attack on the Capitol on Jan 6

Not how someone else characterized something else

Mostly peaceful protest. Of course it's irrelevant, you fucking lousy nasty vermin. You're the enemy.

 

[Faun]

Trump has no disqualifications. You're stupid.

Actually, he currently does. Your vacuous denial doesn't actually wash that away.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

YOU were claiming children and non-citizens could be on a ballot. Children and non-citizens can not legally be on a ballot to begin with you stupid bingo. No sane person would even put them there knowing that. Do you even realize how stupid you sound here?

Nor can insurrectionists.

 

[Lesh]

How can you insist there was an insurrection, when there were no such charges brought against any individual and no court convictions of any individual for such a charge?

Why do you make such buffoonish claims?

Ok(sigh)… I’ll ask YOU

How do you characterize the attack on the Capitol that happened on Jan 6?

 

[Faun]

How can you insist there was an insurrection, when there were no such charges brought against any individual and no court convictions of any individual for such a charge?

Why do you make such buffoonish claims?

For the same reason others were barred from office despite not being charged with insurrection. Again, there's precedence, a word you don't understand in legal terms.