Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

Have you read the ruling?
The ruling is irrelevant why do you continue to use that shit?
The ruling does not apply outside of Colorado, and the state high court, whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, paused its decision until Jan. 4 — one day before the deadline for Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold to certify the candidates for the state's March 5 primary.
 
If this unConstitutional verdict by only 4/7 of Democrat-appointed justices were allowed to stand, 32 Red states could decide to kick Biden off the ballot for violating the Constitution while deliberately not enforcing our border.
 
If this unConstitutional verdict by only 4/7 of Democrat-appointed justices were allowed to stand, 32 Red states could decide to kick Biden off the ballot for violating the Constitution while deliberately not enforcing our border.
So, politics and not the rule of law.

Do, explain this banana republic you want fir our country.
 
If this unConstitutional verdict by only 4/7 of Democrat-appointed justices were allowed to stand, 32 Red states could decide to kick Biden off the ballot for violating the Constitution while deliberately not enforcing our border.
And they would have justification with biden's border problem
 
You mean the part where Congress can undo the disqualification by a 2/3 majority vote in both houses?
Literally the only only role for Congress in section 3?
Congress determines who did an insurrection simp do keep up. It's your favorite amendment
 
The SCOTUS is likely to at least grant an extended stay to prevent the enforcement of the Colorado Supreme Court decision beyond January 4, 2025.

And ultimately, by all means, I believe it almost a certainty that they will quash the manifestly lawless decision by the Colorado court.
Why would they grant a stay rather than just ruling on it?
 
Why would they grant a stay rather than just ruling on it?
The ruling does not apply outside of Colorado, and the state high court, whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors, paused its decision until Jan. 4 — one day before the deadline for Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold to certify the candidates for the state's March 5 primary.
 
Congress determines who did an insurrection simp do keep up. It's your favorite amendment
You mean the part I just explained to you, dupe?

How about you post exactly what you’re referring to rather than swinging through your enclosure slinging crap.
 
You mean the part I just explained to you, dupe?

How about you post exactly what you’re referring to rather than swinging through your enclosure slinging crap.
Congress both upper and lower houses make the determination
Your weak ass explanation was wrong
 
He hasn't even been charged with insurrection, dummy.
Where is that required?

He was sued for doing just that and was found to have indeed engaged in insurrection. He was then found to be ineligible to be on the ballot in CO pursuant to section 3 of the 14th amd.

Can’t be any clearer than that.
 
No, they shouldn’t. The proper place to petition your government, state, or federal, for the redress of grievances, is AT the government, not at their homes. In other words, picket the courthouse…but their homes should be off limits.

Besides, their neighbors shouldn’t have to suffer a mob shouting for hours on end because of something a judge did.

No, I think it should go through the appeals process and work through the system legally. Protesting outside of someone’s home isn’t killed going to have any affect other than to galvanize them.

I understand playing the lefts game the same as they do, but not at someone’s house…

If they follow the constitution, this should be overturned easily ..
Of Course the US Supreme Court will reverse that courts decisions. As to acting like Democrats, we must preserve our differences and not act like they act.
 

Forum List

Back
Top