Elections have Consequences

Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Not the dreaded S-word!

Allowing/forcing women alone to decide if a human being lives or dies is as sexist, arbitrary, and capricious as making the father alone decide.
What creepy crawly hole did you come out from under, while planting the lie in that sentence of yours? You pick up a word or a phrase, and suddenly your fairy tale becomes fact for you.
Well I birthed 2 children, since you say my opinion is the only one that matters.

Explain to us again, how is it that a father has nothing to do with his own child.
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Not the dreaded S-word!

Allowing/forcing women alone to decide if a human being lives or dies is as sexist, arbitrary, and capricious as making the father alone decide.
What creepy crawly hole did you come out from under, while planting the lie in that sentence of yours? You pick up a word or a phrase, and suddenly your fairy tale becomes fact for you.
Defying mob-think requires crawling out of a hole sometimes.
You should try a little objectivity and challenge your clique.
 
Elections do have Consequences.

One of the primary reasons I voted against Trump and for Clinton was because of the Supreme Court.

I have heard so many people who are otherwise pro-choice and pro-union vote for Trump just because they wanted to 'drain the swamp' and just take a hammer to the establishment.

Well this is what we get. And I am not bitching about Trump's selection- if anything I am impressed that he is such a solid jurist- unlike some of Trump's lower court picks. This pick was the outcome of the last Presidential election. And he is going to be confirmed to the Court unless by some bizarre circumstance he announces he will vote against Roe v. Wade before the confirmation vote.

Elections do have Consequences.

I just hope that those how believe in woman's right to chose remember that come the next election.

If the entire country has a meltdown every time a SCOTUS judge is appointed do you think maybe the federal government might have too much power?

Just a thought......
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Not the dreaded S-word!

Allowing/forcing women alone to decide if a human being lives or dies is as sexist, arbitrary, and capricious as making the father alone decide.
What creepy crawly hole did you come out from under, while planting the lie in that sentence of yours? You pick up a word or a phrase, and suddenly your fairy tale becomes fact for you.
Well I birthed 2 children, since you say my opinion is the only one that matters.

Explain to us again, how is it that a father has nothing to do with his own child.
His friends tell him to think that way and he doesn't want to make them think less of him.
 
Elections do have Consequences.

One of the primary reasons I voted against Trump and for Clinton was because of the Supreme Court.

I have heard so many people who are otherwise pro-choice and pro-union vote for Trump just because they wanted to 'drain the swamp' and just take a hammer to the establishment.

Well this is what we get. And I am not bitching about Trump's selection- if anything I am impressed that he is such a solid jurist- unlike some of Trump's lower court picks. This pick was the outcome of the last Presidential election. And he is going to be confirmed to the Court unless by some bizarre circumstance he announces he will vote against Roe v. Wade before the confirmation vote.

Elections do have Consequences.

I just hope that those how believe in woman's right to chose remember that come the next election.

If the entire country has a meltdown every time a SCOTUS judge is appointed do you think maybe the federal government might have too much power?

Just a thought......
That's what the debate is about. Constitutional justices and not de facto left wing legislators.
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
The woman in the womb needs her mother. And will until the mother dies.

Besides, DAD, she's as much your daughter as she is her mother's.
And dad said unto the woman, we will have this child if we both decide to. But seeing that the woman carries the burden and risk, the mother in the end, will determine what is best for her, and her body. She will ultimately have the last say. Not the unborn fetus that has yet to develop a functioning brain that uses reason within the womb, and does not feel pain, until that brain is out of the womb, as a fully developed human being. Or the fact that the fetus maybe the result of rape or incest. Not to mention, if the fetus is dead inside or there are complications, dear old dad takes a back seat.
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
A woman doesn't get pregnant like catching a cold. She has to involve herself in a specific behavior with a man.
I'm no mysoginist. You're an advocate for child abuse.
Get your head out of your mob ego box and try a little logic.
Really? And what "child abuse" might that be?
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
The woman in the womb needs her mother. And will until the mother dies.

Besides, DAD, she's as much your daughter as she is her mother's.
And dad said unto the woman, we will have this child if we both decide to. But seeing that the woman carries the burden and risk, the mother in the end, will determine what is best for her, and her body. She will ultimately have the last say. Not the unborn fetus that has yet to develop a functioning brain that uses reason within the womb, and does not feel pain, until that brain is out of the womb, as a fully developed human being. Or the fact that the fetus maybe the result of rape or incest. Not to mention, if the fetus is dead inside or there are complications, dear old dad takes a back seat.
She is a living human being, conceived from the father to the mother. Maybe DAD loves her and doesn't want mom to kill her.

Your phallic patriarchal sexism forces the entire onus onto the woman.
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
The woman in the womb needs her mother. And will until the mother dies.

Besides, DAD, she's as much your daughter as she is her mother's.
And dad said unto the woman, we will have this child if we both decide to. But seeing that the woman carries the burden and risk, the mother in the end, will determine what is best for her, and her body. She will ultimately have the last say. Not the unborn fetus that has yet to develop a functioning brain that uses reason within the womb, and does not feel pain, until that brain is out of the womb, as a fully developed human being. Or the fact that the fetus maybe the result of rape or incest. Not to mention, if the fetus is dead inside or there are complications, dear old dad takes a back seat.
Using the dog-wagging anecdotal exceptions as a rule again.
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
A woman doesn't get pregnant like catching a cold. She has to involve herself in a specific behavior with a man.
I'm no mysoginist. You're an advocate for child abuse.
Get your head out of your mob ego box and try a little logic.
Really? And what "child abuse" might that be?
Intentionally denying a human the very basic human right of the opportunity to be raised by his parents just because a woman's gender says so.
 
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
A woman doesn't get pregnant like catching a cold. She has to involve herself in a specific behavior with a man.
I'm no mysoginist. You're an advocate for child abuse.
Get your head out of your mob ego box and try a little logic.
Really? And what "child abuse" might that be?
Intentionally denying a human the very basic human right of the opportunity to be raised by his parents just because a woman's gender says so.
Ha boss, you have to get to that human first, before that human gets the right. The woman knows her body and what is best for her in the end. There exists no child abuse, because there is no child. The child only exists in your imaginary wacko religious, radically driven mind.
 
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
The woman in the womb needs her mother. And will until the mother dies.

Besides, DAD, she's as much your daughter as she is her mother's.
And dad said unto the woman, we will have this child if we both decide to. But seeing that the woman carries the burden and risk, the mother in the end, will determine what is best for her, and her body. She will ultimately have the last say. Not the unborn fetus that has yet to develop a functioning brain that uses reason within the womb, and does not feel pain, until that brain is out of the womb, as a fully developed human being. Or the fact that the fetus maybe the result of rape or incest. Not to mention, if the fetus is dead inside or there are complications, dear old dad takes a back seat.
She is a living human being, conceived from the father to the mother. Maybe DAD loves her and doesn't want mom to kill her.

Your phallic patriarchal sexism forces the entire onus onto the woman.
"She is a living human being"? Really? Says who? You? And who are you?

Tell me, while she was in the womb, did she have her nails done? Did she request to have her hair done up in a pony tail? Lol!

Folks like you act as if the "she" in the womb was asking the mom if she could borrow the car keys. You people need to gather yourself together and get back to planet earth. This is crazy talk.
 
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
A woman doesn't get pregnant like catching a cold. She has to involve herself in a specific behavior with a man.
I'm no mysoginist. You're an advocate for child abuse.
Get your head out of your mob ego box and try a little logic.
Really? And what "child abuse" might that be?
Intentionally denying a human the very basic human right of the opportunity to be raised by his parents just because a woman's gender says so.
Ha boss, you have to get to that human first, before that human gets the right. The woman knows her body and what is best for her in the end. There exists no child abuse, because there is no child. The child only exists in your imaginary wacko religious, radically driven mind.
Nothing radical nor religious about a man’s DNA.
 
Elections do have Consequences.

One of the primary reasons I voted against Trump and for Clinton was because of the Supreme Court.

I have heard so many people who are otherwise pro-choice and pro-union vote for Trump just because they wanted to 'drain the swamp' and just take a hammer to the establishment.

Well this is what we get. And I am not bitching about Trump's selection- if anything I am impressed that he is such a solid jurist- unlike some of Trump's lower court picks. This pick was the outcome of the last Presidential election. And he is going to be confirmed to the Court unless by some bizarre circumstance he announces he will vote against Roe v. Wade before the confirmation vote.

Elections do have Consequences.

I just hope that those how believe in woman's right to chose remember that come the next election.
If you would only choose contraceptives!
That we have the right to choose contraceptives is because of a rather radical decision by the Supreme Court.
Then don’t put their efforts to waste. Use them and avoid slaughtering the unborn.
No one is ‘slaughtering the unborn,’ the notion is a ridiculous rightwing lie.

The issue is the appointment of justices to the Supreme Court hostile to the right to privacy, conservative justices who seek to increase the size and authority of government at the expense of individual liberty.

Individuals know best how to decide personal, private matters such as whether to have a child or not, not the state.
 
Yes, as Obama so arrogantly said when he was installing his brand of Fundamental Transformation. Elections DO have consequences.
 
Syriusly said:
One of the primary reasons I voted against Trump and for Clinton was because of the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court Is Why I Voted FOR Trump !!

I Figure If He Can Pack The Courts With Constitutionalists
His Admin Will Be A Success No Matter What Else Happens

Just One More Supreme Pick To Go...
She Can't Out-Last His Two Terms
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Not the dreaded S-word!

Allowing/forcing women alone to decide if a human being lives or dies is as sexist, arbitrary, and capricious as making the father alone decide.
What creepy crawly hole did you come out from under, while planting the lie in that sentence of yours? You pick up a word or a phrase, and suddenly your fairy tale becomes fact for you.
Well I birthed 2 children, since you say my opinion is the only one that matters.

Explain to us again, how is it that a father has nothing to do with his own child.

I'm with you.

I had two kidlits myself. I say dad's should have some kind of say, I'm just not entirely sure how to work it out legally/fairly yet.
 
The summer of 2018 will be remembered in part as the year lots of folks on the left attended a Greekfest!:deal:

This past week has been rivaled in level of hysterical laughing by the right by few events we can think of.....

Dukakis riding around with the helmet in the tank....the picture of the blue dress on CNN......the day Gore went down hard.....Aunt Hilda's election headquarters on election night and now this Trump pick! A hoot if you are in the right.....
 
Last edited:
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Yep, I was talking about sexism in the form of feminist double standards. More typical bigotry from the left.
You're an author.
Boss, get with the program. Try a little logical deductive reasoning. Have you ever been pregnant? Exactly! Neither have I. Before you start talking "double standards", why don't you live in a woman's shoes. I've heard that many times from women, and they are exactly right. Are you a woman? If not, you and I don't know squat. Get it now? Or are you of the misogynist arrogant, ass hole type, who knows everything about what a woman needs?
A woman doesn't get pregnant like catching a cold. She has to involve herself in a specific behavior with a man.
I'm no mysoginist. You're an advocate for child abuse.
Get your head out of your mob ego box and try a little logic.
Really? And what "child abuse" might that be?
Intentionally denying a human the very basic human right of the opportunity to be raised by his parents just because a woman's gender says so.

Americans intentionally deny children the 'right' to be raised by his/her parents all of the time in America- it is called divorce- and abandonment.

What you are pissed about is that the man cannot escape his fiscal obligation to care for his child- even if he can avoid his moral obligation to raise his child.
 
Why does a woman choose what happens to a man’s baby? That’s his DNA and not just her body. Totally sexist.
Talk about sexist. Did you write a book?
Not the dreaded S-word!

Allowing/forcing women alone to decide if a human being lives or dies is as sexist, arbitrary, and capricious as making the father alone decide.
What creepy crawly hole did you come out from under, while planting the lie in that sentence of yours? You pick up a word or a phrase, and suddenly your fairy tale becomes fact for you.
Well I birthed 2 children, since you say my opinion is the only one that matters.

Explain to us again, how is it that a father has nothing to do with his own child.

I'm with you.

I had two kidlits myself. I say dad's should have some kind of say, I'm just not entirely sure how to work it out legally/fairly yet.

So lets say your husband/partner told you that he wanted you to get an abortion- should he have been able to require you to get an abortion?

Or if not- be off the hook of paying for his kids?
 

Forum List

Back
Top