Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, she did not. She had absolutely nothing to do with writing the law. The Solicitor General represents the United States in cases in the Supreme Court. When she left, there were not ACA cases before the Supreme Court and only one had initially reached the Appeals Court. More to the point, what if she did recuse. The outcome would have been the same, only the vote would have been 5 to 3. Can you count?She had no right to vote on the ACA case because as Solicitor General she helped craft the pile of crap.
No, she did not. She had absolutely nothing to do with writing the law. The Solicitor General represents the United States in cases in the Supreme Court. When she left, there were not ACA cases before the Supreme Court and only one had initially reached the Appeals Court. More to the point, what if she did recuse. The outcome would have been the same, only the vote would have been 5 to 3. Can you count?
She was asked to recuse because of idiots like you. You have no fucking idea what the solicitor general does. No clue what you are talking about.No, she did not. She had absolutely nothing to do with writing the law. The Solicitor General represents the United States in cases in the Supreme Court. When she left, there were not ACA cases before the Supreme Court and only one had initially reached the Appeals Court. More to the point, what if she did recuse. The outcome would have been the same, only the vote would have been 5 to 3. Can you count?
The hell she didn't....otherwise why would she have been asked to recuse herself and refused to? And don't give me the "her vote didn't matter" bullshit...she had no right to vote.
So, you can't count.No, she did not. She had absolutely nothing to do with writing the law. The Solicitor General represents the United States in cases in the Supreme Court. When she left, there were not ACA cases before the Supreme Court and only one had initially reached the Appeals Court. More to the point, what if she did recuse. The outcome would have been the same, only the vote would have been 5 to 3. Can you count?
The hell she didn't....otherwise why would she have been asked to recuse herself and refused to? And don't give me the "her vote didn't matter" bullshit...she had no right to vote.
No, she did not. She had absolutely nothing to do with writing the law. The Solicitor General represents the United States in cases in the Supreme Court. When she left, there were not ACA cases before the Supreme Court and only one had initially reached the Appeals Court. More to the point, what if she did recuse. The outcome would have been the same, only the vote would have been 5 to 3. Can you count?
The hell she didn't....otherwise why would she have been asked to recuse herself and refused to? And don't give me the "her vote didn't matter" bullshit...she had no right to vote.
Sorry, but you're saddled with it. You have to subsidize it and allow it to deprive children of at least one of their parents and you can do nothing to stop it. We are being held hostage be neo-nazis.They can proclaim anything they want. Nothing is changed for me. I do not, and will not, accept any 2 gay people as being married. Not ever. I don't care what papers they have, what ceremony they went through, or anything else. Millions of Americans no doubt, think exactly the same.
I dunno, I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body.No more reason for those gay parades I hope. Pretty soon it will be abnormal to be a heterosexual without a sex change.
So, what is the job a of the solicitor general, dipshit?She was asked to recuse because of idiots like you. You have no fucking idea what the solicitor general does. No clue what you are talking about.
Uh huh.....and you just showed yourself to be helpless fucking joke.
She may be a Supreme Court justice, but Elena Kagan is a blithering idiot. In the discourse over Same Sex Marriage, she told the attorney representing SSM bans, John Bursch, you can't decide who is going to get equal treatment by law, and who isn't.
EARTH TO ELENA: We do exactly that EVERY DAY when we lock up criminals and put them in jails. Is their treatment equal ? Of course not. It's not supposed to be. Every time we put someone in a mental institution we do that. Every time we quarantine someone with Ebola we do that., Every time we hire someone to a job because they are qualified to do it, and don't hire someone else (who isn't qualified) we do that.
Elena isn't making any profound statement about equal treatment. All she is did is be an Activist judge, molding the discussion into how she wanted it to result. This is not even a smart ploy, since it is so obviously ridiculous, no matter the outcome.
This is a pure example of the absurdity of putting people on a supreme court for life. They should be able to be recalled by a public vote.
And what the other 4 justices who voted to allow SSM, said is probably just as stupid, I just happened to tune in and hear the response from Kagan.
So, what is the job a of the solicitor general, dipshit?She was asked to recuse because of idiots like you. You have no fucking idea what the solicitor general does. No clue what you are talking about.
Uh huh.....and you just showed yourself to be helpless fucking joke.
So, what is the job a of the solicitor general, dipshit?She was asked to recuse because of idiots like you. You have no fucking idea what the solicitor general does. No clue what you are talking about.
Uh huh.....and you just showed yourself to be helpless fucking joke.
Maybe the better question is, why can't we ask for Justices to step side when they have publicly stated an opinion on a subject they will most likely review as a Justice?
I understand that intelligent women scare you slope skulls in flyover country, but that is nothing new
So, what is the job a of the solicitor general, dipshit?She was asked to recuse because of idiots like you. You have no fucking idea what the solicitor general does. No clue what you are talking about.
Uh huh.....and you just showed yourself to be helpless fucking joke.
Maybe the better question is, why can't we ask for Justices to step side when they have publicly stated an opinion on a subject they will most likely review as a Justice?
Because then Scalia would have had to recuse himself from the gay marriage issue and there was no way he was ever going to do that.
I disagree, but even if she recused herself, it still would be the same end result, only 5 to 3 in favor.She had no right to vote on the ACA case because as Solicitor General she helped craft the pile of crap.
I disagree, but even if she recused herself, it still would be the same end result, only 5 to 3 in favor.She had no right to vote on the ACA case because as Solicitor General she helped craft the pile of crap.
She may be a Supreme Court justice, but Elena Kagan is a blithering idiot. In the discourse over Same Sex Marriage, she told the attorney representing SSM bans, John Bursch, you can't decide who is going to get equal treatment by law, and who isn't.
EARTH TO ELENA: We do exactly that EVERY DAY when we lock up criminals and put them in jails. Is their treatment equal ? Of course not. It's not supposed to be. Every time we put someone in a mental institution we do that. Every time we quarantine someone with Ebola we do that., Every time we hire someone to a job because they are qualified to do it, and don't hire someone else (who isn't qualified) we do that.
Elena isn't making any profound statement about equal treatment. All she is did is be an Activist judge, molding the discussion into how she wanted it to result. This is not even a smart ploy, since it is so obviously ridiculous, no matter the outcome.
This is a pure example of the absurdity of putting people on a supreme court for life. They should be able to be recalled by a public vote.
And what the other 4 justices who voted to allow SSM, said is probably just as stupid, I just happened to tune in and hear the response from Kagan.
Question, was Bucky a "bigot" when he took the exact same position on SSM 3 years ago?Nobody cares except aggressive homophobes like the previous post:
She is a filthy bulldyke...It was expected and this is why you don't allow fucked up dykes near power.
Poor bigot.
Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...
