🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Elena Kagan Is a Blithering Idiot!

Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...

Funny that anyone thinks about leftist judges on this extremely conservative court. I'm still shaking my head over the 2000 decision that said in effect that we can vote but it's not necessary to count those votes if the election might go the "wrong" way.

Or the Citizen United decision that allows deep pockets to buy elections.


yeah....you didn't pay attention to the truth did you.....if you had you wouldn't have posted that post.....the decision wasn't that the election would go the wrong way, it was that you couldn't count ballots by different standards and call that fair...even within a state. And again, Citizens United just said corporations and unions could donate money to campaigns...pretty common sense...for normal people....
 
Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...

Funny that anyone thinks about leftist judges on this extremely conservative court. I'm still shaking my head over the 2000 decision that said in effect that we can vote but it's not necessary to count those votes if the election might go the "wrong" way.

Or the Citizen United decision that allows deep pockets to buy elections.


Please, realize that whatever leftists you listened to lied to you about both cases......learn this....the left lies...never, ever trust them....

Bush v. Gore - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

In a per curiam decision, the Court, by a 5-4 vote,[1][2] ruled that no alternative method could be established within the time limit set by Title 3 of the United States Code (3 U.S.C.), § 5 ("Determination of controversy as to appointment of electors"), which was December 12.

By a 7-2 vote, the Court ruled that there was an Equal Protection Clauseviolation in using different standards of counting in different counties.[3] Three concurring justices also asserted that the Florida Supreme Court had violated Article II, § 1, cl. 2 of the Constitution, by misinterpreting Florida election law that had been enacted by the Florida Legislature.
 
Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...

Funny that anyone thinks about leftist judges on this extremely conservative court. I'm still shaking my head over the 2000 decision that said in effect that we can vote but it's not necessary to count those votes if the election might go the "wrong" way.

Or the Citizen United decision that allows deep pockets to buy elections.


yeah....you didn't pay attention to the truth did you.....if you had you wouldn't have posted that post.....the decision wasn't that the election would go the wrong way, it was that you couldn't count ballots by different standards and call that fair...even within a state. And again, Citizens United just said corporations and unions could donate money to campaigns...pretty common sense...for normal people....

Those are the stated reasons. They are illogical. But poor excuses are better than none, I suppose.

Corporations and unions can donate. How fair! Corporations can outspend unions 100 to 1. Let's hear it for common sense.

In the case of Florida why were not all the votes thrown out? If the state can't have a proper standard it should be excluded.
 
She may be a Supreme Court justice, but Elena Kagan is a blithering idiot. In the discourse over Same Sex Marriage, she told the attorney representing SSM bans, John Bursch, you can't decide who is going to get equal treatment by law, and who isn't.

EARTH TO ELENA: We do exactly that EVERY DAY when we lock up criminals and put them in jails..

'equal treatment under the law'- that includes 'due process'- another one of those Constitutional thingies you object to.

Criminals get due process and then are treated differently.

You want to treat homosexuals as criminals- without due process and simply because they are homosexuals.
 
Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...

Funny that anyone thinks about leftist judges on this extremely conservative court. I'm still shaking my head over the 2000 decision that said in effect that we can vote but it's not necessary to count those votes if the election might go the "wrong" way.

Or the Citizen United decision that allows deep pockets to buy elections.


Please, realize that whatever leftists you listened to lied to you about both cases......learn this....the left lies...never, ever trust them....

Bush v. Gore - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Oh my- quoting Wikipedia....you sure showed them.......
 
They can proclaim anything they want. Nothing is changed for me. I do not, and will not, accept any 2 gay people as being married. Not ever. I don't care what papers they have, what ceremony they went through, or anything else. Millions of Americans no doubt, think exactly the same.
Sorry, but you're saddled with it. You have to subsidize it and allow it to deprive children of at least one of their parents and you can do nothing to stop it. We are being held hostage be neo-nazis.

Stop it please- this Neo-Con melt down is making me laugh so hard I am starting to get odd looks.......
 
No, she did not. She had absolutely nothing to do with writing the law. The Solicitor General represents the United States in cases in the Supreme Court. When she left, there were not ACA cases before the Supreme Court and only one had initially reached the Appeals Court. More to the point, what if she did recuse. The outcome would have been the same, only the vote would have been 5 to 3. Can you count?

The hell she didn't....otherwise why would she have been asked to recuse herself and refused to? And don't give me the "her vote didn't matter" bullshit...she had no right to vote.

Judges are asked to recuse themselves all the time and usually refuse.

Just as Justice Thomas did when he as asked to recuse himself.
 
She may be a Supreme Court justice, but Elena Kagan is a blithering idiot. In the discourse over Same Sex Marriage, she told the attorney representing SSM bans, John Bursch, you can't decide who is going to get equal treatment by law, and who isn't.

EARTH TO ELENA: We do exactly that EVERY DAY when we lock up criminals and put them in jails. Is their treatment equal ? Of course not. It's not supposed to be. Every time we put someone in a mental institution we do that. Every time we quarantine someone with Ebola we do that., Every time we hire someone to a job because they are qualified to do it, and don't hire someone else (who isn't qualified) we do that.

Elena isn't making any profound statement about equal treatment. All she is did is be an Activist judge, molding the discussion into how she wanted it to result. This is not even a smart ploy, since it is so obviously ridiculous, no matter the outcome.

This is a pure example of the absurdity of putting people on a supreme court for life. They should be able to be recalled by a public vote.

And what the other 4 justices who voted to allow SSM, said is probably just as stupid, I just happened to tune in and hear the response from Kagan.

Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...
What would you know about smarts.
 
She may be a Supreme Court justice, but Elena Kagan is a blithering idiot. In the discourse over Same Sex Marriage, she told the attorney representing SSM bans, John Bursch, you can't decide who is going to get equal treatment by law, and who isn't.

EARTH TO ELENA: We do exactly that EVERY DAY when we lock up criminals and put them in jails. Is their treatment equal ? Of course not. It's not supposed to be. Every time we put someone in a mental institution we do that. Every time we quarantine someone with Ebola we do that., Every time we hire someone to a job because they are qualified to do it, and don't hire someone else (who isn't qualified) we do that.

Elena isn't making any profound statement about equal treatment. All she is did is be an Activist judge, molding the discussion into how she wanted it to result. This is not even a smart ploy, since it is so obviously ridiculous, no matter the outcome.

This is a pure example of the absurdity of putting people on a supreme court for life. They should be able to be recalled by a public vote.

And what the other 4 justices who voted to allow SSM, said is probably just as stupid, I just happened to tune in and hear the response from Kagan.

Obama didn't put her there for her smarts....he wanted leftist judges and he got them...
What would you know about smarts.


Far more than you and the other lefties.........
 
Thanks for sharing your profound stupidity with us. She did not tell the attorney that.
Sorry idiot. I heard heard her say it on CSPAN2. HER WORDS out of HER mouth. Now go back to mopping your kitchen floor.

PS - Reagan was a liberal, who opposed the California Briggs Initiative allowing queers to teach in public schools, and he also gave amnesty to 3 million illegal aliens. Take a history course.
 
Last edited:
She did not tell the attorney that.
Sorry idiot. I heard her her say it on CSPAN2, which provides an audiotape of the court proceedings. Now you may go back to mopping your kitchen floor.
 
Last edited:
What good does the SCOTUS decision due for gays anyway ? Before this, they could get an apartment or house together, and live as if they were married. So now they get a ceremony, and a piece of paper to go with it. And ? That's it ? That's the difference ?

Millions of people will still regard them as the same pervert lunatics they were regarded all along. Hey, where's Hillary Clinton ? We need somebody to get on here and shout >>>

what-difference-does-it-makes.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top