Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
So that whole native American thing was someone else?
Oddly enough, that hasn't had one iota of an impact on her on-the-job performance so far.
Strange I know, but true.
So having honesty issues means nothing to you?
Oddly enough, that hasn't had one iota of an impact on her on-the-job performance so far.
Strange I know, but true.
So having honesty issues means nothing to you?
It means something.
But not nearly as much as how she's handled the responsibility entrusted to her by the voters of Massachusetts. Obviously I didn't consider the offense a show-stopper when I voted for her, and so far that decision has been vindicated thoroughly. And I have every intention of voting for her again.
You can pretend all you want that it means so much to you that it disqualifies her in your mind, but we both know you're far more 'offended' by her politics than you are this alleged transgression. So if you want to attack her politics then I might be willing to listen to what you have to say, but anyone who still harps on the indian thing shreds their own credibility IMO.
So having honesty issues means nothing to you?
It means something.
But not nearly as much as how she's handled the responsibility entrusted to her by the voters of Massachusetts. Obviously I didn't consider the offense a show-stopper when I voted for her, and so far that decision has been vindicated thoroughly. And I have every intention of voting for her again.
You can pretend all you want that it means so much to you that it disqualifies her in your mind, but we both know you're far more 'offended' by her politics than you are this alleged transgression. So if you want to attack her politics then I might be willing to listen to what you have to say, but anyone who still harps on the indian thing shreds their own credibility IMO.
You've failed to specify what her qualifications were and what she's accomplished. Typical.
She has succeeded in being a nasty scold and a total hypocritical bitch, castigating high earning business people while she herself makes hundreds of thousands of dollars.
No wonder you like her.
It means something.
But not nearly as much as how she's handled the responsibility entrusted to her by the voters of Massachusetts. Obviously I didn't consider the offense a show-stopper when I voted for her, and so far that decision has been vindicated thoroughly. And I have every intention of voting for her again.
You can pretend all you want that it means so much to you that it disqualifies her in your mind, but we both know you're far more 'offended' by her politics than you are this alleged transgression. So if you want to attack her politics then I might be willing to listen to what you have to say, but anyone who still harps on the indian thing shreds their own credibility IMO.
You've failed to specify what her qualifications were and what she's accomplished. Typical.
She has succeeded in being a nasty scold and a total hypocritical bitch, castigating high earning business people while she herself makes hundreds of thousands of dollars.
No wonder you like her.
Her qualifications are that she's voted more or less the way I want her to, and she's delivering on her campaign pledges.
What more do you ask from your elected Congressmen?
You've failed to specify what her qualifications were and what she's accomplished. Typical.
She has succeeded in being a nasty scold and a total hypocritical bitch, castigating high earning business people while she herself makes hundreds of thousands of dollars.
No wonder you like her.
Her qualifications are that she's voted more or less the way I want her to, and she's delivering on her campaign pledges.
What more do you ask from your elected Congressmen?
Those aren't qualifications, dingleberry. RDean would vote the way you want.
What were her campaign pledges? To annoy people and castigate the rich?
Remind me how much of this she's done. Like worked across the aisle. She's one of the most hyper partisan senators.Her qualifications are that she's voted more or less the way I want her to, and she's delivering on her campaign pledges.
What more do you ask from your elected Congressmen?
Those aren't qualifications, dingleberry. RDean would vote the way you want.
What were her campaign pledges? To annoy people and castigate the rich?
Agree to disagree.
It makes her very much qualified IMO.
So that whole native American thing was someone else?
Why is this constantly brought up?
Warren pretty much explained it.
This was her family's lore.
If your mother tells you you have space alien in you..would you call her a liar?
Or go with it.
Who are you to say she is incorrect?
Leave them alone...they have so little
Let them play their indian games
Remind me how much of this she's done. Like worked across the aisle. She's one of the most hyper partisan senators.Those aren't qualifications, dingleberry. RDean would vote the way you want.
What were her campaign pledges? To annoy people and castigate the rich?
Agree to disagree.
It makes her very much qualified IMO.
Election propels Elizabeth Warren to Senate and Scott Brown toward next political venture - Boston.com
If Warren were an R, the media would have destroyed her when she lied about her ancestry. Thus ending her political career...and rightfully so.
Since she is a D, lying is not a problem.
She's their nominee in 2016
I hope not.
I don't believe she's ready. I'd prefer she continue to make waves in the Senate and see how things shape up for 2020.
She's their nominee in 2016
I hope not.
I don't believe she's ready. I'd prefer she continue to make waves in the Senate and see how things shape up for 2020.
She's certainly qualified. And she votes the right way. What's not to like?
If you think there is a work ethic in the inner city, meet my clients. Healthier than I am yet on disability or social security.
I do have to say that the work ethic problem has spread from the inner city. The Rising generation has severe problems with learning to work hard.
Oddly enough, that hasn't had one iota of an impact on her on-the-job performance so far.
Strange I know, but true.
So having honesty issues means nothing to you?
It means something.
But not nearly as much as how she's handled the responsibility entrusted to her by the voters of Massachusetts. Obviously I didn't consider the offense a show-stopper when I voted for her, and so far that decision has been vindicated thoroughly. And I have every intention of voting for her again.
You can pretend all you want that it means so much to you that it disqualifies her in your mind, but we both know you're far more 'offended' by her politics than you are this alleged transgression. So if you want to attack her politics then I might be willing to listen to what you have to say, but anyone who still harps on the indian thing shreds their own credibility IMO.
So having honesty issues means nothing to you?
It means something.
But not nearly as much as how she's handled the responsibility entrusted to her by the voters of Massachusetts. Obviously I didn't consider the offense a show-stopper when I voted for her, and so far that decision has been vindicated thoroughly. And I have every intention of voting for her again.
You can pretend all you want that it means so much to you that it disqualifies her in your mind, but we both know you're far more 'offended' by her politics than you are this alleged transgression. So if you want to attack her politics then I might be willing to listen to what you have to say, but anyone who still harps on the indian thing shreds their own credibility IMO.
Ok so honesty ,or the lack there of don't mean much to you? got it. Now with that said,you are judging others credibility??!! Typical,the ends justify the means no matter what.
Your parents ever teach you integrity? If it was that easy for that little untruth,where would she be with a big one??
Ame®icano;8902877 said:There arent 3 people for every opening.
If there is, there would be no opening left.
And there would be very many fewer people looking for jobs. That's kind of how markets work. But an idiot statist like Warren and her crew have no idea. They think there are a fixed number of jobs available, period.
The Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) data released this morning by the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that there were 3.9 million job openings for 11.3 million job seekers in Septembermeaning that for every job opening there were 2.9 people looking for work. While the job seekers ratio has been decreasing from a high of 6.7-to-1 during the Great Recession, todays ratio of 2.9-to-1 matches the highest the ratio ever got in the early 2000s downturn In a labor market with strong job opportunities, the ratio would be close to 1-to-1, as it was in December 2000.
In her analysis, EPI economist Elise Gould points out that the improvement in the job seekers ratio overstates the improvement in job opportunities. Most of the decline in the number of job seekers is because more than 5 million would-be workers are sidelined; they are neither employed nor looking for work due to the weak labor market, writes Gould. These missing workers are thus not counted as unemployed, but many will become job seekers when a robust jobs recovery finally begins, so job openings will be needed for them, too.
The JOLTS data are also a reminder that the current elevated unemployment rate has little to do with a skills shortage or mismatch, as unemployed workers dramatically outnumber job openings in all industries.
In no industry does the number of job openings even come close to the number of people looking for work, writes Gould. This demonstrates that the main problem in the labor market is a broad-based lack of demand for workersnot, as is often claimed, available workers lacking the skills needed for the sectors with job openings.
The number of workers who voluntarily quit their job remained low in September, at 2.3 million, as did the total number of hires, at 4.5 million.
I hope not.
I don't believe she's ready. I'd prefer she continue to make waves in the Senate and see how things shape up for 2020.
She's certainly qualified. And she votes the right way. What's not to like?
I'd like to see her gain more experience before she runs for the nation's highest office.
