EPA Ignores Science to Propose Most Expensive Regulation in History

[Penelope]

Another zero credibility blog site.

So which claims are you disputing?

Don't you fret little one, the people that pay will be the consumers, that is how "trickle down economics " works, the rich trickle it on down on the consumers. We have one earth and we have to care for it. Not sure if cap and trade is the way to do it, but something about pollution has to be done. Air, water, and land is being polluted.

 

[daws101]

Another zero credibility blog site.

So which claims are you disputing?

Every heard the term all.
Where are the proofs

So the EPA is not proposing this regulation?

Didn't say that .
So me the studies that show the regulations will do more harm than the non regulated bullshit you are defending.
If not stfu.

Read the fucking article, dumbshit.

I did not 1 credible study to be found just unfounded paranoia.

 

[daws101]

Another zero credibility blog site.

So which claims are you disputing?

Don't you fret little one, the people that pay will be the consumers, that is how "trickle down economics " works, the rich trickle it on down on the consumers. We have one earth and we have to care for it. Not sure if cap and trade is the way to do it, but something about pollution has to be done. Air, water, and land is being polluted.

The previous PSA was sponsored by Monsanto.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Another zero credibility blog site.

So which claims are you disputing?

Don't you fret little one, the people that pay will be the consumers, that is how "trickle down economics " works the rich trickle it on down, and pass it on the consumers. We have one earth and we have to care for it. Not sure if cap and trade is the way to do it, but something about pollution has to be done. Air, water, and land is being polluted.

No... Trickle Down Economics doesn't work. As Trickle Down Economics strips massive percentages of Economic production from the producers and trickles tiny, nearly imperceptible levels of coin down to the dregs, as a means to coerce their political support, thus buttressing their means to continue to reap massive quantities of wealth for themselves, playing the Intellectually Less Fortunate for economically depressed fools.

Now this in contrast to Capitalism, Sometimes called Reaganomics, OKA: Capitalism, wherein Government scope and power is starkly limited, individuals with financial means invest in enterprises which have a reasonable potential to return their investment and additional profits beyond that invested. These Enterprises provide goods and services which fill the needs wants and desires of lots of people, who exchange the value they possess for the value they recognizes in the above noted goods and services and due to the demand the enterprises hire individuals to perform services and goods in the delivering of the above noted Goods and Services and so on and so forth, wherein the enterprise benefits those operating the enterprise, those serving the enterprise and those patronizing the enterprises... .

All boats are raised through the rising tide of positive cash flow, except, of course, those who do not participate... .

 

[daws101]

The tree huggers want to punish and tax the citizens for Natures occurring events, like ozone.

Ozone in nature is balanced human activities disrupt that balance.
We can restore balance by changing the way we produce products.

In other words, Ozone occurs naturally. Attempting to reduce it to zero is a fool's errand. Any such attempt will cost astronomical amounts of money.

Does that just about get it?

Hmm so you think people are spending money trying to reduce the amount of "Ozone."

This is one of those times you look like a fool that I mentioned earlier.

What do you imagine the point of the proposed EPA regulation is? Yes, cutting down on Ozone emissions costs money, or do you imagine that complying with EPA regulations is cost free?

You pollute you pay too tough a concept for you?

 

[Obiwan]

Another zero credibility blog site.

So which claims are you disputing?

Every heard the term all.
Where are the proofs

So the EPA is not proposing this regulation?

Didn't say that .
So me the studies that show the regulations will do more harm than the non regulated bullshit you are defending.
If not stfu.

Wow, you ARE a dumbass...

Don't you remember when the EPA cracked down on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) because they were eating a hole in the ozone layer ( and by doing so, were contributing to global warming and allowing more harmful UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface)???

Don't you think it's kind of retarded to pay that much money to INCREASE the amount of Global Warming, not to mention the rate of Melanoma (the deadliest form of cancer)????

 

[daws101]

Another zero credibility blog site.

So which claims are you disputing?

Every heard the term all.
Where are the proofs

So the EPA is not proposing this regulation?

Didn't say that .
So me the studies that show the regulations will do more harm than the non regulated bullshit you are defending.
If not stfu.

Wow, you ARE a dumbass...

Don't you remember when the EPA cracked down on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) because they were eating a hole in the ozone layer ( and by doing so, were contributing to global warming and allowing more harmful UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface)???

Don't you think it's kind of retarded to pay that much money to INCREASE the amount of Global Warming, not to mention the rate of Melanoma (the deadliest form of cancer)????

links?

 

[ScienceRocks]

I think people that pollute should pay...This is why our environment doesn't looks like china or india's...

I think that is a good thing. So I don't think abolishing the epa is a good idea at all.

 

[daws101]

I think people that pollute should pay...This is why our environment doesn't looks like china or india's...

I think that is a good thing. So I don't think abolishing the epa is a good idea at all.

The people who want to abolished the EPA are ignorant fucks or greedy fucks or both.

 

[Obiwan]

So which claims are you disputing?

Every heard the term all.
Where are the proofs

So the EPA is not proposing this regulation?

Didn't say that .
So me the studies that show the regulations will do more harm than the non regulated bullshit you are defending.
If not stfu.

Wow, you ARE a dumbass...

Don't you remember when the EPA cracked down on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) because they were eating a hole in the ozone layer ( and by doing so, were contributing to global warming and allowing more harmful UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface)???

Don't you think it's kind of retarded to pay that much money to INCREASE the amount of Global Warming, not to mention the rate of Melanoma (the deadliest form of cancer)????

links?

Hole in Antarctic ozone layer may be adding to global warming - NBC News

The hole in the planet's ozone layer may be shifting wind patterns and cloud cover over Antarctica in a way that could be triggering slightly warmer global temperatures, a new study finds.

The ozone layer, depletion and uv radiation

A depletion of the ozone layer will increase the UV-radiation at ground level. Increasing doses of UV-B may cause skin cancer, eye cataracts, damage to the immune system in animals as well as human beings, and have an adverse impact on plant growth.


So, let's bankrupt the country where we can boost cancer rates and have more Global Warming??? Dumb move...

Or are you going to argue that we need to lower ozone levels to combat Global Cooling???

 

[daws101]

Every heard the term all.
Where are the proofs

So the EPA is not proposing this regulation?

Didn't say that .
So me the studies that show the regulations will do more harm than the non regulated bullshit you are defending.
If not stfu.

Wow, you ARE a dumbass...

Don't you remember when the EPA cracked down on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) because they were eating a hole in the ozone layer ( and by doing so, were contributing to global warming and allowing more harmful UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface)???

Don't you think it's kind of retarded to pay that much money to INCREASE the amount of Global Warming, not to mention the rate of Melanoma (the deadliest form of cancer)????

links?

Hole in Antarctic ozone layer may be adding to global warming - NBC News

The hole in the planet's ozone layer may be shifting wind patterns and cloud cover over Antarctica in a way that could be triggering slightly warmer global temperatures, a new study finds.

The ozone layer, depletion and uv radiation

A depletion of the ozone layer will increase the UV-radiation at ground level. Increasing doses of UV-B may cause skin cancer, eye cataracts, damage to the immune system in animals as well as human beings, and have an adverse impact on plant growth.


So, let's bankrupt the country where we can boost cancer rates and have more Global Warming??? Dumb move...

Or are you going to argue that we need to lower ozone levels to combat Global Cooling???

Wrong links but thanks for playing.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't want the pollution and river filled with shit that occurs in china or india....It is up to who governs to govern wisely of course so maybe the epa is going a little too far.

The EPA went way beyond the point of "too far" about 20 years ago.

 

[daws101]

The real question is it the chance of increased cancer and other problems that concerns you or is it the money .according to you asshats the country is already morally and financialy bankrupt.so what do we have to lose?

 

[daws101]

I don't want the pollution and river filled with shit that occurs in china or india....It is up to who governs to govern wisely of course so maybe the epa is going a little too far.

The EPA went way beyond the point of "too far" about 20 years ago.

Bullshit. The op is one of the ignorant fucks I just posted about.

 

[bripat9643]

The tree huggers want to punish and tax the citizens for Natures occurring events, like ozone.

Ozone in nature is balanced human activities disrupt that balance.
We can restore balance by changing the way we produce products.

In other words, Ozone occurs naturally. Attempting to reduce it to zero is a fool's errand. Any such attempt will cost astronomical amounts of money.

Does that just about get it?

False ! failed attempt at spin .
It's us who upset the balance and we have to fix it cost is not an issue considering the consequences if we do nothing
If it just effected raving slap dicks like you I'd be right there with a canister of ozone spraying it in your home.

The costs of doing nothing are totally imaginary. The EPA has failed to demonstrate there are any such costs.

You keep referring to "the balance" instead of admitting you want the government to limit ozone to pre-industrial levels. Only the insane would want to live in a world where industry is outlawed. Liberals claim to care about the poor, but the exhibit no qualms about imposing costs on them that would force them to live like the poor in third world countries.

 

[Obiwan]

So the EPA is not proposing this regulation?

Didn't say that .
So me the studies that show the regulations will do more harm than the non regulated bullshit you are defending.
If not stfu.

Wow, you ARE a dumbass...

Don't you remember when the EPA cracked down on chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) because they were eating a hole in the ozone layer ( and by doing so, were contributing to global warming and allowing more harmful UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface)???

Don't you think it's kind of retarded to pay that much money to INCREASE the amount of Global Warming, not to mention the rate of Melanoma (the deadliest form of cancer)????

links?

Hole in Antarctic ozone layer may be adding to global warming - NBC News

The hole in the planet's ozone layer may be shifting wind patterns and cloud cover over Antarctica in a way that could be triggering slightly warmer global temperatures, a new study finds.

The ozone layer, depletion and uv radiation

A depletion of the ozone layer will increase the UV-radiation at ground level. Increasing doses of UV-B may cause skin cancer, eye cataracts, damage to the immune system in animals as well as human beings, and have an adverse impact on plant growth.


So, let's bankrupt the country where we can boost cancer rates and have more Global Warming??? Dumb move...

Or are you going to argue that we need to lower ozone levels to combat Global Cooling???

Wrong links but thanks for playing.

They are both credible links, and demonstrate that:

1) Less ozone (creating a " hole" in the ozone layer) contributes to Global warming, and

2) Less ozone in the atmosphere will allow more UV rays (which are detrimental to plant and animal life) to reach the surface...


Gee, if you can't read the links I posted and figure that out, you might want to check your family tree...

 

[asaratis]

The tree huggers want to punish and tax the citizens for Natures occurring events, like ozone.

Ozone in nature is balanced human activities disrupt that balance.
We can restore balance by changing the way we produce products.

We might be able to restore balance if people like you would learn how to properly punctuate and separate sentences.

 

[bripat9643]

The real question is it the chance of increased cancer and other problems that concerns you or is it the money .according to you asshats the country is already morally and financialy bankrupt.so what do we have to lose?

Less wealth equates directly to poorer health and shorter lifespan. Your belief that they are separate issues is typical left-wing ignorance.

 

[daws101]

The tree huggers want to punish and tax the citizens for Natures occurring events, like ozone.

Ozone in nature is balanced human activities disrupt that balance.
We can restore balance by changing the way we produce products.

In other words, Ozone occurs naturally. Attempting to reduce it to zero is a fool's errand. Any such attempt will cost astronomical amounts of money.

Does that just about get it?

False ! failed attempt at spin .
It's us who upset the balance and we have to fix it cost is not an issue considering the consequences if we do nothing
If it just effected raving slap dicks like you I'd be right there with a canister of ozone spraying it in your home.

The costs of doing nothing are totally imaginary. The EPA has failed to demonstrate there are any such costs.

You keep referring to "the balance" instead of admitting you want the government to limit ozone to pre-industrial levels. Only the insane would want to live in a world where industry is outlawed. Liberals claim to care about the poor, but the exhibit no qualms about imposing costs on them that would force them to live like the poor in third world countries.

False . Your powers of false assumption are amazing !

 

[bripat9643]

I don't want the pollution and river filled with shit that occurs in china or india....It is up to who governs to govern wisely of course so maybe the epa is going a little too far.

The EPA went way beyond the point of "too far" about 20 years ago.

Bullshit. The op is one of the ignorant fucks I just posted about.

So far you have offered zero proof of that.