cereal_killer
Platinum Member
- Apr 9, 2012
- 6,858
- 3,127
Breitbart shut down their coverage of the Redstate Gathering. Nothing going in or out of there
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both Hillary and Biden have more experience than all the Republicans combined
Nonsense.This is a whole other ballgame brother. Trump will not pander to donors or lobbyist and that makes him VERY "dangerous" (as those who have paid attention to him have seen) Like Trump or not he only answers to us, the American people, so he's a wild card and that can sway many votes. His message should resonate with a lot of indie's when the smoke clears and they can no longer drown out his policies.There's a whole year ahead yet. If Trump can weather the storm and stay on message he'll do just fine with independent's. He's doing just fine with this indieAgain, and I hate to burst your bubble, Trump is doing well with circa (maximum) 30% of the GOP electorate. But among Indies he's already cooked to a crisp, stick a fork in him.I likeIf Trump was smart, he would buy tv time at the same time the Red State affair is going on and have half an hour of nothing but his views without the caustic questions that are going to be levelled against him in another Establishment venue.![]()
Notice nobody picked up on his brilliant policy on healthcare, nor bothered to get his opinion on the Iran deal during the debate? Pundits are more focused on bullshit rather than substance and yes Trump has put forth a lot of substance. If people really bothered to listen to him speak rather than forming their opinions on soundbites the msm plays they'd learn something about him. There's a reason Trump is killing in the polls and it's not because of his boorish behavior.
Hell, Clinton even beats Trump in the rural vote.
When was the last time you saw a Democrat winning by +20 in National polling?
Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk
Worse case scenario (depending who's looking at it) he goes independent and the RW nutters are left with their pants around their ankles and a Clinton Presidency. I'm good either way. Doesn't matter if Bush or Clinton is in office, it's just more of the same. Puppets....the whole lot.
Well, ok, if you think so.
But I will repeat: I have never seen a presidential candidate come from 20 behind in the year before to win a GE in the year following - EVER. And ever since polling started with Gallup, it's never happened.
Heck if you paid attention to him, you'd see that his ideas/policies are not at all radical. They're pretty straightforward. No political slant. I do believe a lot of independents will see and support that. The more they are exposed to the "clown car" the more they will see that Trump just may be their guy.
It's going to be an entertaining year for sure. It's fantastic watching the establishment make asses of themselves in front of the American people. I'll enjoy their loss at the polls if they don't wise up.
What a weak responseVery trueYup, there isn't a Republican in the field with 18 years as First Lady like Hillary.
Nor have they set records for air miles.
But then, she nor Biden have ever run a state, has they?
Had to worry about the budget, etc, that governors have the final say on.
But, on the bright side...
even the least experienced Republican running has as much experience as Obama did when he became president.
Can't WAIT for that to be brought up in campaign ads.
Outside of Jeb, none have set foot in the White House. None have any hands on experience in the executive branch, none have any foreign policy experience.
Both Hillary and Biden know international leaders on a first name basis, they understand international dynamics, they understand how Washington functions and who the power players are.
NONE of the Republicans have that kind of experience. None have impressive political resumes
and neither did Obama when you put him in the WH.
he didn't have nearly the experience that McCain had.
and he wasn't much better when he ran against Romney.
Why does experience matter now, when it didn't in the last 2 presidential elections?
And We the People elected Obama. We determined that he was preferable to the best available Republican candidate
Your problem is that you do not have an Obama in your clown car. Obama was the most dynamic political phenomenon in a generation
So all you have is an inexperienced clown car who is currently getting their collective asses kicked by a reality TV star with zero experience
Your problem is that you do not have an Obama in your clown car.
(Thank Goodness)
Obama was the most dynamic political phenomenon in a generation
(Cue laugh track)
So all you have is an inexperienced clown car
and you have a short bus.
a former First Lady that got elected on her husbands name, with a consolation prize of SoS, for which she is under investigation.
a Socialist.
2 other non entities.
and POSSIBLY, a sitting VP, who is already a 2 time loser in presidential runs.
I'll take it as a concession of failure on your part
As if we are suppose to know or give a shit about this guy on Red State
the only reason this was posted by the op was so they could stir up shit. they could care less about any republican, Fox news, etc. they are in the BAG FOR Hillary. what a joke
what a joke
As if we are suppose to know or give a shit about this guy on Red State
the only reason this was posted by the op was so they could stir up shit. they could care less about any republican, Fox news, etc. they are in the BAG FOR Hillary. what a joke
As if we are suppose to know or give a shit about this guy on Red State
the only reason this was posted by the op was so they could stir up shit. they could care less about any republican, Fox news, etc. they are in the BAG FOR Hillary. what a joke
The libs on this board are truly bizarre people. They put up threads mocking R's on a continual basis but notice how they can't come up with good threads on their own primary candidates?
Means they are really floundering. They are stuck with Hillary and they know it. That's why the progressives are so pissy these days.
As if we are suppose to know or give a shit about this guy on Red State
the only reason this was posted by the op was so they could stir up shit. they could care less about any republican, Fox news, etc. they are in the BAG FOR Hillary. what a joke
The libs on this board are truly bizarre people. They put up threads mocking R's on a continual basis but notice how they can't come up with good threads on their own primary candidates?
Means they are really floundering. They are stuck with Hillary and they know it. That's why the progressives are so pissy these days.
Why is this thread so funny?
Because when all is said and done none of this dust up will hurt Trump. Only help him.
Eric's a bloody fool to jump on the PC train. And a mega fool to have cancelled Trump's invitation.
Eric is also a fucking hypocrite.
Anyone remember when he called Supreme Court Justice David Souter a GOAT FUCKING CHILD MOLESTER?
of course they can't. they HAVE no good candidates and THEY know it
The libs on this board are truly bizarre people. They put up threads mocking R's on a continual basis but notice how they can't come up with good threads on their own primary candidates?
The 'establishment' being the few sane republicans left interested in responsible governance.I was not impressed with Trump's performance during the debate, but the one thing he has managed to do is show that FAUX News, Megyn Kelly and Erik Erikson are nothing more than mouthpieces for the establishment RINO wing.
The one thing Trump has been masterful at is exposing who is part of the establishment, and for that Trump deserves a standing, whistling ovation.