Even Conservatives have had enough of the Geller bitch

BTW, Geller is not anti-Muslim.

She's anti-people-who-murder-others-for-drawing-pictures-on-paper.

And she's absolutely right.

The liberals who blame the people drawing pictures on paper, and don't blame the people firing guns at them, are the "bitches that even conservatives have had enough of".

When can we expect the OP to change the title of this thread, to point out reality?
 
o'reily supports 'stop and search' in NYC . He has also called the AR and AK heavy weapons . o'reily may be conservative on some issues but I'd label him as a statist before I call him conservative '2 A guy' !! Greta , I use to think she was a sharp thinker but lately I think she is going silly and she has a Constitutional background as a lawyer I think . Napolitano is still good so far in my opinion . Blondie Kelly surprised me with her clear thinking !! Judge Jeanine still makes sense . Boy oh boy , the above is the state of telly news in the USA .
 
Pam Geller is not an opponent of radical Muslims. She is an opponent of all Islam and only a fool would delude themselves otherwise.
Do you have any particular evidence to back up this nonsense? Or did you just make it up as you have made up so much else?
 
7 Conservatives Who Surprisingly Have Refused To Stand Behind Pam Geller


Only 7 -- that's sad. Hopefully more will realize they need to throw the loud mouth bitch under the bus. The women is a joke who is mocked and ridiculed by her community.

Of all the Fox hosts, Van Susteren came down on Geller the hardest, accusing her of luring police into danger by casting aside "good judgment."

"Yes, of course, there is a First Amendment right and of course it’s very important. But the exercise of that right includes using good judgement," Van Susteren said on Tuesday evening.

Van Susteren said that "everyone" knew the event would become violent, and that Geller went ahead and put police in jeopardy anyway.

"Was it fair to the police, to knowingly put them at risk by this unnecessary provocation?" she asked. "I say no."
But when an art museum in NYC displayed an image of Jesus with feces all over it, and the religious right claimed foul (without killing anyone, violent protesting, or threats) the left claimed..."freedom of speech"....and now those same people are saying "Geller is a bitch".

Cool.

Asshole.
Youre arguing the difference between art and pornography.

Both are covered by the first amendment, but pornography isn't art.

Geller is a pornographer.
 
Of all the Fox hosts, Van Susteren came down on Geller the hardest, accusing her of luring police into danger by casting aside "good judgment."

"Yes, of course, there is a First Amendment right and of course it’s very important. But the exercise of that right includes using good judgement," Van Susteren said on Tuesday evening.
Liberals always blame the people who do harmless, ordinary things, while carefully avoiding blaming the people who were actually causing the problems. Here one of them does exactly that. Where is any mention of the "judgment" exercised by the people who brought out guns, pointed them at others who had done nothing wrong, and pulled the triggers? Instead Van Susteren complains only about people who drew pictures on paper, and who encouraged others in that completely harmless activity.

"Was it fair to the police, to knowingly put them at risk by this unnecessary provocation?" she asked. "I say no."
Again the mysterious accusation of people using only pencils and paper, "putting police at risk". It's complete nonsense, as is obvious to any normal people (i.e. anyone other than liberals).

People who point guns at others and pull the triggers, are the ones "putting police at risk", not people drawing pictures on paper.

If the people with the guns want to blame the people drawing pictures on paper, they are simply wrong. And if they want to commit crimes on that basis, they are extremely wrong and mentally sick, and we must stop them by any and all means at hand.

Flushing out the sick murderers and luring them to a place where armed and trained police are ready to handle them (as these police did), is one way to do that, and a pretty effective one. Kudoes to the police who volunteered for that duty. They are heroes, and saved the lives, not only of people drawing pictures on paper that day, but the lives of the next people those sick murderers would have killed next month or next year. Two down, xxx to go.

And the liberals who agree with the gunmen and try to blame the people drawing pictures on paper, are just as wrong AND just as mentally sick. They aren't actually killing people (yet), but they are making it a lot easier for the gunmen to do it.
 
I think she is great, I like the way she has exposed how fucked up muslims are
She exposed how fucked up she is, the attendees are, and two muslims were.
There a lot more than two Muslims condemning people for drawing pictures on paper.

And that's the problem we need to deal with.

The people drawing pictures on paper, are not a problem of any kind.

Except to sick, fanatical murderers... and some of the liberals on this thread.
 
Sure are a lot of free speech haters in this thread.
It would be bad enough if all they were doing was hating free speech.

But they are encouraging murderers. And blaming the people who did nothing but speak (and draw) freely, for the murderers' attempts to kill them.

Sort of like blaming a tree for the forest fire that destroys it.

These people are sick.
 

Forum List

Back
Top