Sweet_Caroline
Gold Member
- Jun 15, 2013
- 4,174
- 824
- 155
So Sherri, you will not dispute Snouter's claim, but prefer to skirt the subject and carry on pissing on Jews. No surprise there of course. You are as predictable as they come.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't call it either.LMAO @ ignorant Billy-Boy! That story isn't a "Parable": it's a Midrash.
As detailed in this sermon from an Episcopal cleric: http://www.stjohns-hingham.org/storage/sermons/Sermon September 30 2013.pdf
What Zionist nonsense you spew, I have been in Church over 8 hours today.
I have a life and certainly do leave my house.
Right. You posted until midnight. You began posting at 4 AM your time. You will post nonstop for another 20 hours and think it's normal to post 20 hours a day 7 days a week. If you leave your house then you take your Big Lots PC with you so you can post your Jew hate 20 hours a day. BTW Good morning 1st shift Satanic Sherri.
So Sherri, you will not dispute Snouter's claim, but prefer to skirt the subject and carry on pissing on Jews. No surprise there of course. You are as predictable as they come.
I didn't call it either.LMAO @ ignorant Billy-Boy! That story isn't a "Parable": it's a Midrash.
As detailed in this sermon from an Episcopal cleric: http://www.stjohns-hingham.org/storage/sermons/Sermon September 30 2013.pdf
Nice strawman, though.
Incorrect. The Jews were his people. His ministry focused upon his own people. It was only at the end - prior to his disappearance - that Jesus tasked his surviving disciples to go out into the world and to preach his message amongst the Gentiles.You can't be anymore wrong and you have no clue as to what Christ was about. HE didn't consider jews to be "HIS" people; ALL people, were HIS people.Personal opinion:
I believe that if Jesus of Nazareth had lived in modern times, that he would have been a Zionist.
I base this upon an elementary definition of Zionism: a collective effort to re-establish a Jewish Homeland on the lands formerly occupied by the Jewish kingdoms of antiquity.
I base this upon Jesus' obvious love for his people, as witnessed by his ministry amongst them and respect for Jewish law and prophecy and tradition.
Mind you, it's entirely possible that Jesus would object strenuously to some of the tactics used by Israel, but he would probably have sided with the Zionists until blood started to flow, at which point he might have broken away from the Zionist movement.
With them in early years and early decades, apart from them later, or so it strikes me.
So, yeah, it sounds believeable that Jesus might have been an early-days Zionist, had he lived in the modern era.
With respect to what I want for the State of Israel - there is truth in what you say. Fortunately for me, I"ve never claimed to be a particularly good Christian and any judgment on my soul will be between me and my God; not according to your guidelines."...In fact, HIS message, is opposite of what you support..."
I don't know about narcissim and selfishness, but I do, indeed, support Israel's re-conquest of its spiritual homeland, and have adopted a to-the-victor-go-the-spoils mindset with respect to Israeli territorial gains."...You support narcissism, selfishness conquest and to the victor go the spoils..."
I do not presume nor pretend to know the mind of God."...What Jesus supported..."
I would not presume nor pretend to know the Mind of God... for shame.If Jesus lived as a man today, He would say the exact same things He said then now, believe I am the Son of God or stand condemned...
Had he lived in the early decades of the Zionist era, it seems reasonable to speculate that he would have supported the concept of a return to the Holy Land, although it seems equally reasonable to speculate that he not have approved of many of the methods that eventually came to be used by the Zionist movement and its successors."...He is not and never was a Zionist..."
"...Why would His gospel change?..."
"...The gospel of the Kingdom is eternal."
I would not presume nor pretend to know the Mind of God... for shame.If Jesus lived as a man today, He would say the exact same things He said then now, believe I am the Son of God or stand condemned...
Had he lived in the early decades of the Zionist era, it seems reasonable to speculate that he would have supported the concept of a return to the Holy Land, although it seems equally reasonable to speculate that he not have approved of many of the methods that eventually came to be used by the Zionist movement and its successors."...He is not and never was a Zionist..."
"...Why would His gospel change?..."
1. we would be certain that we were getting his words, not those of others
2. we would be getting his teachings without the accretions piled on top of it over the centuries
3. different times call for different approaches to life and society and even the attaining of paradise
"...The gospel of the Kingdom is eternal."
Like all Sacred Texts, the Gospels have certainly locked-out changes; after the various repeaters and translators and editors and early Church Councils and Fathers got finished with them.
It is modern-day interpretation which keeps the Gospels alive and functional.
Without an ability to apply these religious precepts to any given Age of Man, then Men would not continue to find the Gospels relevant.
The Gospels only remain relevant so long as they can be related to any given Age of Man.
And such Jesus-was-a-Zionist' speculation is just that - an attempt by partisans (of which I'm one) to speculate on whether Jesus would have approved of the concept, if not the tactics by which the goal is accomplished.
Such speculation requires personal effort and personal reflection and imagination and thinking outside the box. It is not a comfortable or efficient plane of existence for the dogmatic, nor those given-over to (a) un-thinking and robotic cut-and-paste of passages and (b) a simple, child-like and petulant insistence that her interpretation is the only valid interpretation.
It is such a mindless, dogmatic mindset that makes possible religious wars in every age.
I cannot think of any better way to keep the Gospels alive than to speculate upon what those Ancients would have thought of the modern world and its goings-on.
But that does not mean that I presume nor pretend to know the mind of God.
Jesus and His words dissolve hate.
God is love.
Jesus was a mortal man.If Jesus lived as a man today, He would say the exact same things He said then now, believe I am the Son of God or stand condemned .
He is not and never was a Zionist.
Why would His gospel change?
The gospel of the Kingdom is eternal.
Many also believe that he was a vessel containing an earthly manifestation of God.
Had the mortal man in Jesus lived in modern times, and had he been brought up to speed on 2000 years of misery for his people, and had he come into the knowledge that they had held themselves together as a people and as a belief system for 2000 years, and especially had he been informed of the scope and brutality of the Holocaust of the 20th, who knows what he might have said or felt?
I do not presume to speak for God nor to know the mind of God, as manifested either by the Father or by any earthly manifestation of the Divine Spirit.
The Gospels certainly contain what little was preserved of the words and teachings of Jesus but they are imperfect recordings, made from memory many years after the death of Jesus, by aging men, and dictated to scribes, and subject to much editing and translation and re-stranslation and consolidation and additions and deletions and shifts in chronology and focus during the early centuries that The Church existed.
The Gospels may be reliably utilized to portray those aspects of Early Christian Teachings that survived all those centuries of editing and re-translation, but they cannot be utilized by any sane person to absolutely portray just how Jesus of Nazareth would react if he were living as a modern man.
It seems safe to accord to him an early backing of the Zionist movement in modern times, but it also seems safe to accord to him a distancing of self from the Zionist movement as it became clear that blood was going to flow - given his loving, peaceful, reconciling nature.
I do not presume to know the mind of God.
And would not dare say that I know how this Son would react in modern times.
I do not presume to know the mind of God.
And think it great shame and disgrace to pretend otherwise.
I do not presume to know the mind of God.
Sherri is really screwy. She actually claims "Jesus is not a Zionist & never was." So you see folks, throughout the Gospels of the New Testament Jesus preached to move the Jews out of their Jewish homeland. Bet you Zionists didn't know that, huh?