🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Ever wonder what's going on, and why? My hypothesis is...

...Governments need a villain for their people to fear. A fearful public will grant more power to their government to keep them safe from it and go about their disinterested apathetic lives. Germany did it with the Jews and others, communist nations did it with capitalists and intellectuals, and presently the US is doing it with Muslims.

The US invades arab countries to steal oil and resources. This naturally causes resentment but without a military to counter US forces with arabs and Muslims can only resort to asymmetric warfare aka terrorism. So they launch small-scale attacks against occupying US forces locally and abroad. THe US government says "Ah see there! They're bad and we must stop them." But were they bad before or AFTER we invaded their countries? If they'd invaded and occupied the US wouldn't we do the same thing if our military was disabled? Of course we would. So the supposed threat of Islam is really just a natural result of attacking arab bee hives. You fiddle with the hive, the bees come out and defend it. Maybe if you didn't fiddle with it in the first place they wouldn't try and sting you.

If Islam itself was really such a threat we'd be done. There's 1.5 billion of them all over the world. If the religion itself was inherently evil and out to control the world, they'd have done it by now. What's actually going on is western Christian-led nations are using it as a scapegoat like nations and empires have throughout history. Make someone or something into an enemy and your people will give you all the power over them you want to keep them safe. But when the threat is of your own making starting the conflict in the first place, how long until your people realize their leadership isn't the good guys, and their "enemy" the bad guys?

I remember coming to this realization back after getting out of the Navy. The US is not the men in white hats fighting a defensive war. We're the villains causing the problems in the first place. That was a sucky thing to realize but it's true. We're the bad guys. And while they might not be the traditional good guys, they're not the ultimate embodiment of evil either. They're simply resisting US imperialism however they can. We call it terrorism when they do it to us. They call it terrorism when we do it to them. Who's right?
Jesus, man! You need some history lessons. Attacks by Muslims, following the teachings of the rabid dog, Muhammed, started well over a 1000 years ago.

You are more full of shit than your mentor, Obama!

Read ALL of this linked article before you spurt back with some more ridiculous bullshit.
The Long Bloody History of Islamic Terrorism - Must read history doesn t lie It s us or them

Here's part of it:
These “experts” also seem to believe that this split between so-called “moderate” Muslims and the Islamic terrorists is something new. These “experts” have missed the mark by about 1300 hundred years. The present Islamic terrorists are a result of the split within Islam between Muslims who wish to live in the 21st century, secular Muslims, and the followers of “True Islam” who want the world to be ruled by Islamic Sharia law with the Quran as the new world constitution.

The recent attack in London proves the line between a “moderate” Muslim and a terrorist is very, very thin. It seems with only a small dose of “True Islam” a peaceful Muslim can become a mass murderer.

Islamic terrorism started long before there was an Israel. Sunni and Shia Muslims have been killing each other since the death of Mohammed.

Centuries ago, Islam ruled a large part of the world and Muslims had spread out of the Middle East and moved across Europe, conquering all in their path. At Islam’s pinnacle, the Ottoman Empire stretched from Egypt to the Black Sea and from the Persian Gulf to Hungary.

So what happened to the glorious Islamic empire? Today, Islam blames the Crusades, the Jews, Western culture, and Christians for its fall from power. In truth, the most destructive enemy that Islam has ever had was Islam itself.

As the world modernized around them, the Islamic leaders refused to move forward with the rest of the world. Firmly believing in Islamic superiority, the pompous ruling class of religious leaders planted the seeds of hatred towards the West as far back as the 1700s. The ruling Islamic religious leaders believed western inventions were evil things created by evil and inferior people.

Any attempt to modernize the empire was put down by the ruling Islamic body called the ulema which wanted to hold onto its power and maintain Islam in its pure state. This meant no non-Muslim influence of any kind.

It should be no surprise that the western advancements in warfare eventually overwhelmed the archaic ways of Islam. The Islamic dream of ruling the world, was over.

At the end of World War I, France and England carved up what was left of the once great Islamic Empire. All that remained was Turkey. It was the Islamic Turks who slaughtered over 1.5 million Armenian Christians. The Turks blamed the Armenian Christians for assisting in Islam’s fall from power. Islam has a long history of blaming others for its failures.
 
...Governments need a villain for their people to fear. A fearful public will grant more power to their government to keep them safe from it and go about their disinterested apathetic lives. Germany did it with the Jews and others, communist nations did it with capitalists and intellectuals, and presently the US is doing it with Muslims.

The US invades arab countries to steal oil and resources. This naturally causes resentment but without a military to counter US forces with arabs and Muslims can only resort to asymmetric warfare aka terrorism. So they launch small-scale attacks against occupying US forces locally and abroad. THe US government says "Ah see there! They're bad and we must stop them." But were they bad before or AFTER we invaded their countries? If they'd invaded and occupied the US wouldn't we do the same thing if our military was disabled? Of course we would. So the supposed threat of Islam is really just a natural result of attacking arab bee hives. You fiddle with the hive, the bees come out and defend it. Maybe if you didn't fiddle with it in the first place they wouldn't try and sting you.

If Islam itself was really such a threat we'd be done. There's 1.5 billion of them all over the world. If the religion itself was inherently evil and out to control the world, they'd have done it by now. What's actually going on is western Christian-led nations are using it as a scapegoat like nations and empires have throughout history. Make someone or something into an enemy and your people will give you all the power over them you want to keep them safe. But when the threat is of your own making starting the conflict in the first place, how long until your people realize their leadership isn't the good guys, and their "enemy" the bad guys?

I remember coming to this realization back after getting out of the Navy. The US is not the men in white hats fighting a defensive war. We're the villains causing the problems in the first place. That was a sucky thing to realize but it's true. We're the bad guys. And while they might not be the traditional good guys, they're not the ultimate embodiment of evil either. They're simply resisting US imperialism however they can. We call it terrorism when they do it to us. They call it terrorism when we do it to them. Who's right?


The US invades arab countries to steal oil and resources.

Where did we do this?
 
...Governments need a villain for their people to fear. A fearful public will grant more power to their government to keep them safe from it and go about their disinterested apathetic lives. Germany did it with the Jews and others, communist nations did it with capitalists and intellectuals, and presently the US is doing it with Muslims.

The US invades arab countries to steal oil and resources. This naturally causes resentment but without a military to counter US forces with arabs and Muslims can only resort to asymmetric warfare aka terrorism. So they launch small-scale attacks against occupying US forces locally and abroad. THe US government says "Ah see there! They're bad and we must stop them." But were they bad before or AFTER we invaded their countries? If they'd invaded and occupied the US wouldn't we do the same thing if our military was disabled? Of course we would. So the supposed threat of Islam is really just a natural result of attacking arab bee hives. You fiddle with the hive, the bees come out and defend it. Maybe if you didn't fiddle with it in the first place they wouldn't try and sting you.

If Islam itself was really such a threat we'd be done. There's 1.5 billion of them all over the world. If the religion itself was inherently evil and out to control the world, they'd have done it by now. What's actually going on is western Christian-led nations are using it as a scapegoat like nations and empires have throughout history. Make someone or something into an enemy and your people will give you all the power over them you want to keep them safe. But when the threat is of your own making starting the conflict in the first place, how long until your people realize their leadership isn't the good guys, and their "enemy" the bad guys?

I remember coming to this realization back after getting out of the Navy. The US is not the men in white hats fighting a defensive war. We're the villains causing the problems in the first place. That was a sucky thing to realize but it's true. We're the bad guys. And while they might not be the traditional good guys, they're not the ultimate embodiment of evil either. They're simply resisting US imperialism however they can. We call it terrorism when they do it to us. They call it terrorism when we do it to them. Who's right?

your president has made the villain to be white people

the enemy
 

Forum List

Back
Top