‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says

[iceberg]

They had nothing, in other words. Only a brain dead moron would accept that kind of evidence. The FBI had the authority to subpoena the server. Why didn't it?

Why didn't they just do a pre-dawn raid and go get it? Like fly an Apache over there, and some tanks....

do you not know how to read?

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2018/07/Muellerindictment.pdf

He knows how to read. He's trolling

simply provide the fbi report of them examining said hack.

However, in March 2017, former FBI Director James Comey told Congress that the FBI got an “appropriate substitute” from CrowdStrike, and Mueller’s indictment makes clear that the FBI has lots of information about the hack from both within the DNC and from other sources.
CNN.com - Transcripts

The long answer is that there is no "server"—there are many different servers and pieces of internet infrastructure in question, and the United States intelligence community and independent security researchers have examined much of it and have all reached the same conclusion: Russia hacked the DNC.

...CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC to respond to the hack, gave an identical image of some of the servers to the FBI, which experts I’ve spoken to say would be more useful than giving the FBI a physical server itself. I say “widely believed,” because we don’t know exactly what CrowdStrike gave to the FBI. However, in March 2017, former FBI Director James Comey told Congress that the FBI got an “appropriate substitute” from CrowdStrike, and Mueller’s indictment makes clear that the FBI has lots of information about the hack from both within the DNC and from other sources. CrowdStrike declined a request for comment from Motherboard.


I called up Thomas Rid, professor of strategic studies at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies to help explain the technical details behind this type of forensic investigation. Rid, who wrote a detailed explanation about why Russia was likely behind the DNC hack for Motherboard in July 2016, told me that “from a forensic point of view, the question of a server at this stage doesn’t make any sense.”


“To really investigate a high profile intrusion like the DNC hack, you have to look beyond the victim network,” Rid said. “You have to look at the infrastructure—the command and control sites that were used to get in that are not going to be on any server ... looking at one server is just one isolated piece of infrastructure.”

"For decades, it has been industry-standard forensic and digital evidence handling practice to conduct analysis on forensic images instead of original evidence"


Even so, what CrowdStrike gave the FBI is likely better than if it had seized and analyzed a physical box.


“To keep it simple, let’s say there’s only one server. CrowdStrike goes in, makes a complete image including a memory dump of everything that was in the memory of the server at the time, including traffic and connections at the time,” Rid said. “You have that image from the machine live in the network including its memory content, versus a server that someone physically carries into the FBI headquarters. It’s unplugged, so there’s no memory content because it’s powered down. That physical piece of hardware is less valuable for an investigation than the onsite image and data extraction from a machine that is up and running. The idea a physical server would add any value doesn’t make any sense.”


What Rid means is that after a hack, some of the evidence of who did it and how they did it may be fleeting. It could be in the server’s memory, the RAM, and not stored on its hard drive. (Hackers use “fileless” malware precisely for this reason.) To preserve evidence in cases like these, incident responders need to make an image—essentially a copy of the server in that exact same state at that exact same time—so they can look at it afterwards. Think about this like when investigators take pictures of the crime scene or victim.

Lesley Carhart, principal threat hunter at the cybersecurity firm Dragos, told Motherboard that physical servers are rarely seized in forensics investigations.

"For decades, it has been industry-standard forensic and digital evidence handling practice to conduct analysis on forensic images instead of original evidence," she said. "This decreases the risk of corruption or accidental modification of that evidence."


MUCH MORE TO READ ON IT HERE:

Trump's Stupid ‘Where Is the DNC Server?’ Conspiracy Theory, Explained

and as you like to say to others but never do yourself - READ MY LINK - IT'S ALL THERE!!!

Credibility of Cyber Firm that Claimed Russia Hacked the DNC Comes Under Serious Question

Here’s the Public Evidence Russia Hacked the DNC — It’s Not Enough
"Is Yandex — the Russian equivalent of Google — some sort of giveaway? Anyone who claimed a hacker must be a CIA agent because they used a Gmail account would be laughed off the internet. We must also acknowledge that just because Guccifer 2.0 pretended to be Romanian, we can’t conclude he works for the Russian government — it just makes him a liar."

but you won't be open to these possibilities cause that would be open to being wrong.

 

[Lesh]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

 

[iceberg]

Dmitri Alperovitch - Wikipedia

wow. the co-founder of crowdstrike is -

russian.

Alperovitch was born in Moscow in 1980. In 1990, his parents moved to Maryland for a nuclear safety training program, but he stayed behind in the USSR — by law — to make sure his parents did not defect. In 1994, the whole family moved to Chattanooga. Alperovitch earned a B.S. in computer science in 2001, and a M.S. in information security in 2003, both from Georgia Institute of Technology.

something tells me i'm about to see a hell of downplay on the "russia" connection now.

keep in mind i'm not saying anything bad about the man. i honestly don't know enough of his background TO say. but funny as hell anything RUSSIA related has been twisted to be some jacked up russian-connection of foul play, yet the one server that we HEAR was hacked by russian was only analyzed by a company founded by a russian.

 

[MisterBeale]

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

No it doesn't. But the fact that the hacks were done by Guccifer 2.0 which has been identified as Russian GRU...and the contacts between Stone, Assange, and GRU is damning

Assange's association with Snowden (now currently hiding in Moscow) doesn't help him either

The entire story of the "HACK" is a lie. It wasn't a hack, it was a leak. I don't know how many times you folks need to be told this.

That whole article in motherboard is disinformation.
This is a smoke screen.



The MSM is feeding everyone a lie. Motherboard Vice is part of the CFR, MSM. If real tech professionals were called before a trial, the case would dissolve.

Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence
Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence

"In a memo to President Trump, a group of former U.S. intelligence officers, including NSA specialists, cite new forensic studies to challenge the claim of the key Jan. 6 “assessment” that Russia “hacked” Democratic emails last year.


MEMORANDUM FOR: The President

FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

SUBJECT: Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job?

Executive Summary

Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computer. After examining metadata from the “Guccifer 2.0” July 5, 2016 intrusion into the DNC server, independent cyber investigators have concluded that an insider copied DNC data onto an external storage device.



Then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (right) talks with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, with John Brennan and other national security aides present. (Photo credit: Office of Director of National Intelligence)


Key among the findings of the independent forensic investigations is the conclusion that the DNC data was copied onto a storage device at a speed that far exceeds an Internet capability for a remote hack. Of equal importance, the forensics show that the copying was performed on the East coast of the U.S. Thus far, mainstream media have ignored the findings of these independent studies [see here and here].


Independent analyst Skip Folden, who retired after 25 years as the IBM Program Manager for Information Technology, US, who examined the recent forensic findings, is a co-author of this Memorandum. He has drafted a more detailed technical report titled “Cyber-Forensic Investigation of ‘Russian Hack’ and Missing Intelligence Community Disclaimers,” and sent it to the offices of the Special Counsel and the Attorney General. VIPS member William Binney, a former Technical Director at the National Security Agency, and other senior NSA “alumni” in VIPS attest to the professionalism of the independent forensic findings.


The recent forensic studies fill in a critical gap. Why the FBI neglected to perform any independent forensics on the original “Guccifer 2.0” material remains a mystery – as does the lack of any sign that the “hand-picked analysts” from the FBI, CIA, and NSA, who wrote the “Intelligence Community Assessment” dated January 6, 2017, gave any attention to forensics.


NOTE: There has been so much conflation of charges about hacking that we wish to make very clear the primary focus of this Memorandum. We focus specifically on the July 5, 2016 alleged Guccifer 2.0 “hack” of the DNC server. In earlier VIPS memoranda we addressed the lack of any evidence connecting the Guccifer 2.0 alleged hacks and WikiLeaks, and we asked President Obama specifically to disclose any evidence that WikiLeaks received DNC data from the Russians [see here and here].

Addressing this point at his last press conference (January 18), he described “the conclusions of the intelligence community” as “not conclusive,” even though the Intelligence Community Assessment of January 6 expressed “high confidence” that Russian intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the DNC … to WikiLeaks.”

Obama’s admission came as no surprise to us. It has long been clear to us that the reason the U.S. government lacks conclusive evidence of a transfer of a “Russian hack” to WikiLeaks is because there was no such transfer. Based mostly on the cumulatively unique technical experience of our ex-NSA colleagues, we have been saying for almost a year that the DNC data reached WikiLeaks via a copy/leak by a DNC insider (but almost certainly not the same person who copied DNC data on July 5, 2016).

From the information available, we conclude that the same inside-DNC, copy/leak process was used at two different times, by two different entities, for two distinctly different purposes:

-(1) an inside leak to WikiLeaks before Julian Assange announced on June 12, 2016, that he had DNC documents and planned to publish them (which he did on July 22) – the presumed objective being to expose strong DNC bias toward the Clinton candidacy; and

-(2) a separate leak on July 5, 2016, to pre-emptively taint anything WikiLeaks might later publish by “showing” it came from a “Russian hack.”


Mr. President:


This is our first VIPS Memorandum for you, but we have a history of letting U.S. Presidents know when we think our former intelligence colleagues have gotten something important wrong, and why. For example, our first such memorandum, a same-day commentary for President George W. Bush on Colin Powell’s U.N. speech on February 5, 2003, warned that the “unintended consequences were likely to be catastrophic,” should the U.S. attack Iraq and “justify” the war on intelligence that we retired intelligence officers could readily see as fraudulent and driven by a war agenda.


The January 6 “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand-picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda-driven category. It is largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” hacked the DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks. . . . . (con't)"


You will notice. . . this journalism HAS LINKS, backing up what they are saying, unlike that Motherboard propaganda.

 

[Lesh]

Mueller's people have indicted GRU AGENTS based on metadata.

It's beyond question that Guccifer 2.0 (the hacker) was a fake name used by Russian hackers...Russian INTEL Agents

 

[Lesh]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

 

[iceberg]

Mueller's people have indicted GRU AGENTS based on metadata.

It's beyond question that Guccifer 2.0 (the hacker) was a fake name used by Russian hackers...Russian INTEL Agents

oh hell dude. the left didn't know what meta-data was until it backfired on them the last 2 big events, busting their own side in the process.

suddenly it's a key term to be used at all opportunities.

 

[Lesh]

Mueller's people have indicted GRU AGENTS based on metadata.

It's beyond question that Guccifer 2.0 (the hacker) was a fake name used by Russian hackers...Russian INTEL Agents

oh hell dude. the left didn't know what meta-data was until it backfired on them the last 2 big events, busting their own side in the process.

suddenly it's a key term to be used at all opportunities.

Thanks for saying nothing.

trolls be trollin

 

[MisterBeale]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

 

[iceberg]

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Ignore.

Deny.

Whatever it takes.

 

[Lesh]

Schiff is correct.
Stone knew of Podesta being hacked 6 weeks before the hacked e-mails were made public.
There is only one explanation for that; he was in concert with the hackers.

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

 

[iceberg]

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

 

[MisterBeale]

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Ignore.

Deny.

Whatever it takes.

Sort of like Covington Catholic High School kids and that Jussie Smollett story. Quick to condemn, equally quick to ignore and deny poor behavior in service to a political agenda.


smh . . .

 

[Lesh]

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

 

[iceberg]

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

 

[MisterBeale]

You need to expand your information sources. I think you are getting some biased information. This is being tried in the court of public opinion. He hasn't been found guilty.

It is just as likely he guessed.

A couple things are well known.

1) Hillary was hacked.

2) Assange has operated, for quite some time, a limited hang-out, and a whistle blower site.

3) There are very few people on the planet that loath Hillary more than Assange.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put the pieces together. If anyone had those emails, and was going to release damaging information at the most opportune time, it would be good 'ol Julian.

Hell, I'd had guessed it back then, everyone that loathed Hillary was hoping, he just had a national platform to make the prediction. THAT DOESN'T MAKE HIM A RUSSIAN AGENT.

It just makes him wise. He could have said, hey, maybe Cryptome has them too, but that would have been dicey, as most folks would have picked Assange first.

Roger Stone, Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta's email would be hacked
Roger Stone, Donald Trump confidant: I did not know John Podesta’s email would be hacked

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

 

[MisterBeale]

Stone a Russian agent?

 

[The Original Tree]

Mueller’s team said that Corsi was in communication with Stone, an adviser to President Trump, during the 2016 campaign and that Stone asked Corsi to contact WikiLeaks about the dissemination of the hacked emails, according to documents obtained by The Washington Post.

“Word is friend in embassy plans 2 more dumps. One shortly after I’m back. 2nd in Oct,” Corsi wrote in an email to Stone on Aug. 2, 2016. “Impact planned to be very damaging.”

The email was sent 10 weeks before WikiLeaks began to publish emails hacked from Clinton aide John Podesta.

According to the documents, Stone encouraged Corsi to contact WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and obtain information about the email leaks.

“Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [WikiLeaks] emails,” Stone wrote to Corsi on July 25, 2016.

Corsi then forwarded that email to Assange.

The Washington Post cannot be trusted to tell the truth, they are COINTELPRO.

Why the Washington Post 's New Ties to the CIA Are So Ominous | HuffPost

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

That's awesome!

 

[Lesh]

Dude...stay away from the brown acid

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

It didn't "blow up" shit.

And I know very well what it means.

It means that digital finger prints are left behind when you hack into a system. And those digital fingerprints were traced to the fucking Kremlin

 

[Lesh]

Stone a Russian agent?

He's working at their behest...

Traitors always think they are working for their own interests. They are fooling themselves