‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says

[Oddball]

Schiff is a kook.

But in this case he is 100% correct.

No, it's not....He's a delusional kook, just like you.

 

[MisterBeale]

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

It didn't "blow up" shit.

And I know very well what it means.

It means that digital finger prints are left behind when you hack into a system. And those digital fingerprints were traced to the fucking Kremlin

Wow, you really don't have a clue what it means!

 

[Oddball]

Stone a Russian agent?

He's working at their behest...

Traitors always think they are working for their own interests. They are fooling themselves

 

[iceberg]

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

It didn't "blow up" shit.

And I know very well what it means.

It means that digital finger prints are left behind when you hack into a system. And those digital fingerprints were traced to the fucking Kremlin

Wow, you really don't have a clue what it means!

god damn - that has nothing to do with it does it?

lesh - i'd shut up at this point. meta-data is even in a simple mp3 file. has nothing to do with hacking a system really.

 

[iceberg]

Let's say all of this IS true.


WaPo for me, is behind a paywall, and I would prefer not to use it.

However, the NYPOST concluded with this;

"The emails from Podesta were stolen by Russian intelligence agencies, the CIA has concluded.

Mueller’s special counsel probe is attempting to determine whether the Trump campaign colluded with a foreign power who was meddling in the election."


Which, I can assume is the establishment and Deep State's POV, yes? This is what you would like everyone to believe?

However, if you go back and address what I wrote in post #284, you will find no court will ever convict, as the experts will all tell you, the emails were LEAKED, NOT HACKED. IOW, the entire premise is wrong.

There can be no collusion if the entire operation was domestic to begin with. If the source of the information, and the theft was always domestic from the very beginning. THE CIA's CONCLUSION IS WRONG!


Some will tell you it was Seth Rich, I don't know. There is no definitive proof. However, the forensic analysis is saying it was leaked, but you are ignoring this.

Seth Rich your ass.

That's what PUTIN is claiming

Our intell...AMERICAN intel experts...FBI...have found meta data indicating that GRU agents executed the hacks and gave the fruits of that to Assange.

Stop spouting the Kremlin lies

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

It didn't "blow up" shit.

And I know very well what it means.

It means that digital finger prints are left behind when you hack into a system. And those digital fingerprints were traced to the fucking Kremlin

so you just proved you're a fucking idiot.

no more use for this one, your honor.

 

[Lesh]

stop using words you don't understand, meta-man.

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

It didn't "blow up" shit.

And I know very well what it means.

It means that digital finger prints are left behind when you hack into a system. And those digital fingerprints were traced to the fucking Kremlin

Wow, you really don't have a clue what it means!

god damn - that has nothing to do with it does it?

lesh - i'd shut up at this point. meta-data is even in a simple mp3 file. has nothing to do with hacking a system really.

I didn't say it ONLY had to do with hacking liar. I said that hacking leaves meta data fingerprints

You deny that?

 

[Oddball]

I didn't say it ONLY had to do with hacking liar. I said that hacking leaves meta data fingerprints

You deny that?

Those can easily be faked, idiota.

 

[iceberg]

Your lack of knowledge is not mine.

Educate yourself

metadata definition - Google Search

But hey...if all you can do is troll...carry on

you finding it on google doesn't mean you knew jack shit about it til it blew up on the left twice this last week or 2. exposed some people for being the liars they've always been known to be. now suddenly you fling this new term around as if it's a defense vs. what killed your entire stance.

i'll end it with saying "you keep using that word...i do not think it means what you think it means"

carry on being a dumbass mad at the world.

It didn't "blow up" shit.

And I know very well what it means.

It means that digital finger prints are left behind when you hack into a system. And those digital fingerprints were traced to the fucking Kremlin

Wow, you really don't have a clue what it means!

god damn - that has nothing to do with it does it?

lesh - i'd shut up at this point. meta-data is even in a simple mp3 file. has nothing to do with hacking a system really.

I didn't say it ONLY had to do with hacking liar. I said that hacking leaves meta data fingerprints

You deny that?

fucking idiot.

 

[Lesh]

From wired

Sometimes, a malicious actor is only definitively identified because they make a mistake. Guccifer 2.0, the now-notorious Russian hacker persona, was reportedly unmasked in part because they forgot to turn on their VPN, revealing their Moscow-based IP address. Absent such slip-ups, the so-called “attribution problem” makes connecting cybercrimes to specific individuals a daunting task.

The GRU was either very sloppy or intentionally pointing out their capabilities

Update, 7/13/2018: Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office identified Guccifer 2.0 as a Russian intelligence officer and indicted him along with 11 other officers for crimes related to the alleged hacking of Democrats in 2016.

Guccifer 2.0, the “lone hacker” who took credit for providing WikiLeaks with stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, was in fact an officer of Russia’s military intelligence directorate (GRU), The Daily Beast has learned. It’s an attribution that resulted from a fleeting but critical slip-up in GRU tradecraft.

 

[Crepitus]

Schiff is a kook.

But in this case he is 100% correct.

No, it's not....He's a delusional kook, just like you.

I'm sorry, that is incorrect. Would you like to try again?

 

[Lesh]

I didn't say it ONLY had to do with hacking liar. I said that hacking leaves meta data fingerprints

You deny that?

Those can easily be faked, idiota.

You idiots are gonna have to synch up your bullshit talking points.

First you say that meta data doesn't leave finger prints and then you say they can be faked.

One of those (actually both in different ways) is bullshit

 

[Oddball]

Schiff is a kook.

But in this case he is 100% correct.

No, it's not....He's a delusional kook, just like you.

I'm sorry, that is incorrect. Would you like to try again?

All of you RUSSIA! kooks are fucking kooks....Period...Full stop.

 

[MisterBeale]

Lesh is a perfect example of this. . . .

Stone a Russian agent?

He's working at their behest...

Traitors always think they are working for their own interests. They are fooling themselves

I see. So the only thing that matters is their party identification?

If they are a Democrat? And they don't intend any harm?

Well then? All good.

Comey Sticks to His Claim That Hillary Lacked Criminal Intent
James Comey: Hillary Clinton Lacked Criminal Intent, He Reiterates | National Review

. . . but, if they are a Republicans and lack criminal intent?

well, boo fucking hoo eh?

Too GD bad, right?


. . . . time to whip out those process crimes, eh?


We've turned into a banana republic where the judiciary is now being used to advance a political agenda. It's shameful.


Do you honestly think the moderates and independents in the middle don't see what is going on? Seriously?

 

[Oddball]

From wired

Sometimes, a malicious actor is only definitively identified because they make a mistake. Guccifer 2.0, the now-notorious Russian hacker persona, was reportedly unmasked in part because they forgot to turn on their VPN, revealing their Moscow-based IP address. Absent such slip-ups, the so-called “attribution problem” makes connecting cybercrimes to specific individuals a daunting task.

The GRU was either very sloppy or intentionally pointing out their capabilities

Update, 7/13/2018: Special counsel Robert Mueller’s office identified Guccifer 2.0 as a Russian intelligence officer and indicted him along with 11 other officers for crimes related to the alleged hacking of Democrats in 2016.

Guccifer 2.0, the “lone hacker” who took credit for providing WikiLeaks with stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee, was in fact an officer of Russia’s military intelligence directorate (GRU), The Daily Beast has learned. It’s an attribution that resulted from a fleeting but critical slip-up in GRU tradecraft.

 

[Crepitus]

Schiff is a kook.

But in this case he is 100% correct.

No, it's not....He's a delusional kook, just like you.

I'm sorry, that is incorrect. Would you like to try again?

All of you RUSSIA! kooks are fucking kooks....Period...Full stop.

That's two tries, and still wrong.

One more time?

 

[iceberg]

I didn't say it ONLY had to do with hacking liar. I said that hacking leaves meta data fingerprints

You deny that?

Those can easily be faked, idiota.

You idiots are gonna have to synch up your bullshit talking points.

First you say that meta data doesn't leave finger prints and then you say they can be faked.

One of those (actually both in different ways) is bullshit

information that gets put into the meta-data of e-mail can be faked before it goes into the e-mail.

but people who know what meta-data is know this.

 

[ColonelAngus]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Who paid Christopher Steele - Fusion GPS paid Christopher Steele. The Clinton Campaign has no ties to the Dossier or its production, because neither Steele nor Fusion ever had contact with the Campaign. In order to have "collusion" you need meetings, phone calls, emails - communication with whoever you're colluding with. The Clinton Campaign had no contact with Fusion, except through arm's length third parties.

That is how "opposition research" is done. Clinton asked the lawyers to get her some opposition research and they did. She didn't know from who, or from where.

The rest of your Russian troll bullshit is ignored.

We know we know. Trump colluded with Putn to rig the 2016 election. They stole the election from HIllary.

 

[Dragonlady]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Who paid Christopher Steele - Fusion GPS paid Christopher Steele. The Clinton Campaign has no ties to the Dossier or its production, because neither Steele nor Fusion ever had contact with the Campaign. In order to have "collusion" you need meetings, phone calls, emails - communication with whoever you're colluding with. The Clinton Campaign had no contact with Fusion, except through arm's length third parties.

That is how "opposition research" is done. Clinton asked the lawyers to get her some opposition research and they did. She didn't know from who, or from where.

The rest of your Russian troll bullshit is ignored.

We know we know. Trump colluded with Putn to rig the 2016 election. They stole the election from HIllary.

They didn't "steal the election from Hillary". They stole the election from the American people, in order to install a President who was in the thrall and beholding to Vladimir Putin, and who would help Putin achieve his aims of destroying the western alliances and trading deals.

 

[Oddball]

They didn't "steal the election from Hillary". They stole the election from the American people, in order to install a President who was in the thrall and beholding to Vladimir Putin, and who would help Putin achieve his aims of destroying the western alliances and trading deals.

 

[ColonelAngus]

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says​

‘Evidence in plain sight’ of Trump collusion with Russia, Schiff says - POLITICO
By PATRICK TEMPLE-WEST ~~ House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Sunday that there is ample evidence Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Russia. In an interview on CNN, Schiff rejected Senate Intelligence Chairman Richard Burr’s statements from earlier this month, in which Burr said evidence shows no collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia.
“Chairman Burr must have a different word for it,” Schiff told host Dana Bash on “State of the Union,” pointing to communications between Russia and Donald Trump Jr. and former Trump aides George Papadopoulos and Michael Flynn.
“You can see evidence in plain sight on the issue of collusion, pretty compelling evidence,” Schiff said, adding, “There is a difference between seeing evidence of collusion and being able to prove a criminal conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”




~~~~~~
Who paid a foreign agent named Christopher Steele to collect information, distribute it to US Media and ultimately US Law Enforcement? Evidence of collusion in plain sight? Someone better have a straight jacket handy when this goofball finally pops. It's close. There’s lots of plain-sight evidence of Hillary, Comey, Mueller, etc. Russia collusion, but we don’t care because shut up.
I wonder if this man understands that he will be in the history books, his legacy will be the head of the snake in the Progressive Marxist Socialist Dem Party in Congress that tried and FAILED a coup d'état. His spawn will want to change their names from two F's to two T's to avoid being associated with him in the future.
I only wish he could be publicly hanged in the streets for sedition with Comey, McCabe, Strzok and Hillary.
The fact remains that this idiot is still out there spewing these lies means that our FAKE NEWS media have learned nothing. They are too complicit in this treason, too involved to let it go now that the truth is coming out and CNN will not last ONE year once Trump is no longer in office. They are an embarrassment.
The cowardly Captain Queeg of the Caine Mutiny made more sense that Schiff.

Who paid Christopher Steele - Fusion GPS paid Christopher Steele. The Clinton Campaign has no ties to the Dossier or its production, because neither Steele nor Fusion ever had contact with the Campaign. In order to have "collusion" you need meetings, phone calls, emails - communication with whoever you're colluding with. The Clinton Campaign had no contact with Fusion, except through arm's length third parties.

That is how "opposition research" is done. Clinton asked the lawyers to get her some opposition research and they did. She didn't know from who, or from where.

The rest of your Russian troll bullshit is ignored.

We know we know. Trump colluded with Putn to rig the 2016 election. They stole the election from HIllary.

They didn't "steal the election from Hillary". They stole the election from the American people, in order to install a President who was in the thrall and beholding to Vladimir Putin, and who would help Putin achieve his aims of destroying the western alliances and trading deals.

They stole the election just like illegal immigrants are more law abiding than American citizens.

You are funny, if I didn’t know better, I would swear you are a troll. You have the very odd capacity to not take new evid nice into consideration on any issue. Once you make up your mind, that’s it.

Do you think the world is flat and the center of the universe?