So are tbe pictures of Trump and Ivanka. Do you find that creepy?
I find that you find a still photo creepy, another vivid demonstration of your desperation. It seems to me, you need to concern yourself with your weak, confused candidate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So are tbe pictures of Trump and Ivanka. Do you find that creepy?
They're addressing it same way Stalin would, trying to scrub it from existence.Biden is going to have to address this, one way or the other. Democrats aren't as tribal as Republicans, and the DNC knows it and knows this could keep people home in November.
This thread has NOTHING to do with Trump. FOCUSThanks for confirming my statement: guilty until proven innocent.Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.
Now I know you are a lying hypocrite.
Hilary Clinton
Barak Obama
Joe Biden
Both sides have been guilty of it. But can’t even admit it.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, she admitted to destroying the emails. Nothing happened. Proven to be guilty yet innocent was her case. Just like with the Donald Trump spying case.
She was PROVEN guilty, yet treated like innocent. Dealing with these idiots gets more and more tedious.
Guilty of breaking a rule no reasonable prosecuter would prosecute. Then there is Trump whom Mueller could not exhonerste of obstruction Because the DoJ made a new rule that you can not indict a sitting president.
This thread has NOTHING to do with Trump. FOCUSThanks for confirming my statement: guilty until proven innocent.Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.
Now I know you are a lying hypocrite.
Hilary Clinton
Barak Obama
Joe Biden
Both sides have been guilty of it. But can’t even admit it.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, she admitted to destroying the emails. Nothing happened. Proven to be guilty yet innocent was her case. Just like with the Donald Trump spying case.
She was PROVEN guilty, yet treated like innocent. Dealing with these idiots gets more and more tedious.
Guilty of breaking a rule no reasonable prosecuter would prosecute. Then there is Trump whom Mueller could not exhonerste of obstruction Because the DoJ made a new rule that you can not indict a sitting president.
You have to presuppose innocence. It is the way our justice system works: innocent until proven guilty. Not all countries are like that. I think it is a very important distinction.The idea that “all women must be believed” removes it from that, and presupposes guilt and innocence.
And you are presupposing innocence before any evidence is laid to bear. I myself don't think one phone call to Larry King is enough evidence, and the rightists on this board are presupposing guilt. Both you and they are doing the exact same thing and for the same reason. Presupposition spits in the face of actual justice.
None of you are blameless. None. Of. You.
And I disagree it spits in the face of justice. Justice is taking the evidence and determining guilt or innocence through a jury system.
But you have to start from a base, either one is innocent and must prove guilt or one is guilty and must prove innocence.
What other base is there?
This thread has NOTHING to do with Trump. FOCUSThanks for confirming my statement: guilty until proven innocent.Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.
Now I know you are a lying hypocrite.
Hilary Clinton
Barak Obama
Joe Biden
Both sides have been guilty of it. But can’t even admit it.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, she admitted to destroying the emails. Nothing happened. Proven to be guilty yet innocent was her case. Just like with the Donald Trump spying case.
She was PROVEN guilty, yet treated like innocent. Dealing with these idiots gets more and more tedious.
Guilty of breaking a rule no reasonable prosecuter would prosecute. Then there is Trump whom Mueller could not exhonerste of obstruction Because the DoJ made a new rule that you can not indict a sitting president.
No you freak, that's the opposite of true....Biden is going to have to address this, one way or the other. Democrats aren't as tribal as Republicans, and the DNC knows it and knows this could keep people home in November.
Malarkey.
Blips, such as this, rape, assault, drugs, murder, fraud, corruption, as you well know, are great resume enhancements for Democrats.
That's not the middle. That's the extreme right.What other base is there?
The base in the middle. Neutrality. Where one does not presume guilt or innocence until the facts and evidence proving one or the other have been laid out.
You mean like with Kavanaugh and Trump?You have to presuppose innocence. It is the way our justice system works: innocent until proven guilty. Not all countries are like that. I think it is a very important distinction.The idea that “all women must be believed” removes it from that, and presupposes guilt and innocence.
And you are presupposing innocence before any evidence is laid to bear. I myself don't think one phone call to Larry King is enough evidence, and the rightists on this board are presupposing guilt. Both you and they are doing the exact same thing and for the same reason. Presupposition spits in the face of actual justice.
None of you are blameless. None. Of. You.
And I disagree it spits in the face of justice. Justice is taking the evidence and determining guilt or innocence through a jury system.
But you have to start from a base, either one is innocent and must prove guilt or one is guilty and must prove innocence.
What other base is there?
No one has the right to be believed.Perhaps I missed it but I have been looking for Sec. of State Hillary Clinton making this sort of a statement now that VP Joe Biden is in the crosshairs.
Hillary to Sexual Assault Victims: "You Have The Right To Be Heard, You Have The Right To Be Believed"
Posted on September 14, 2015
![]()
Hillary Clinton: Women Should Be Believed When They Claim Rape; "Have To Increase Prevention"
At a press conference held Monday in Cedar Falls, Iowa, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton addressed sexual assault on campus and how women should to respond to an attack. "There is a big divide between survivors who do not want to seek the criminal justice system for different...www.realclearpolitics.com
How about blasey Ford? Was her story believable? Even the people she named as witnesses didn't believe it.You have to presuppose innocence. It is the way our justice system works: innocent until proven guilty. Not all countries are like that. I think it is a very important distinction.The idea that “all women must be believed” removes it from that, and presupposes guilt and innocence.
And you are presupposing innocence before any evidence is laid to bear. I myself don't think one phone call to Larry King is enough evidence, and the rightists on this board are presupposing guilt. Both you and they are doing the exact same thing and for the same reason. Presupposition spits in the face of actual justice.
None of you are blameless. None. Of. You.
And I disagree it spits in the face of justice. Justice is taking the evidence and determining guilt or innocence through a jury system.
But you have to start from a base, either one is innocent and must prove guilt or one is guilty and must prove innocence.
What other base is there?
I think you should start with the story the victim is telling. Is it believeable, and I'm having a hard time believing this one.
Only because it shows the utter hypocrisy of TDS morons like you.This thread has NOTHING to do with Trump. FOCUSThanks for confirming my statement: guilty until proven innocent.Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.
Now I know you are a lying hypocrite.
Hilary Clinton
Barak Obama
Joe Biden
Both sides have been guilty of it. But can’t even admit it.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, she admitted to destroying the emails. Nothing happened. Proven to be guilty yet innocent was her case. Just like with the Donald Trump spying case.
She was PROVEN guilty, yet treated like innocent. Dealing with these idiots gets more and more tedious.
Guilty of breaking a rule no reasonable prosecuter would prosecute. Then there is Trump whom Mueller could not exhonerste of obstruction Because the DoJ made a new rule that you can not indict a sitting president.
This thread has EVERYTHING to do with Trump.
So are tbe pictures of Trump and Ivanka. Do you find that creepy?
I find that you find a still photo creepy, another vivid demonstration of your desperation. It seems to me, you need to concern yourself with your weak, confused candidate.
You have to presuppose innocence. It is the way our justice system works: innocent until proven guilty. Not all countries are like that. I think it is a very important distinction.The idea that “all women must be believed” removes it from that, and presupposes guilt and innocence.
And you are presupposing innocence before any evidence is laid to bear. I myself don't think one phone call to Larry King is enough evidence, and the rightists on this board are presupposing guilt. Both you and they are doing the exact same thing and for the same reason. Presupposition spits in the face of actual justice.
None of you are blameless. None. Of. You.
And I disagree it spits in the face of justice. Justice is taking the evidence and determining guilt or innocence through a jury system.
But you have to start from a base, either one is innocent and must prove guilt or one is guilty and must prove innocence.
What other base is there?
I think you should start with the story the victim is telling. Is it believeable, and I'm having a hard time believing this one.
Coyote has a one track mind.This thread has NOTHING to do with Trump. FOCUSThanks for confirming my statement: guilty until proven innocent.Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.
Now I know you are a lying hypocrite.
Hilary Clinton
Barak Obama
Joe Biden
Both sides have been guilty of it. But can’t even admit it.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, she admitted to destroying the emails. Nothing happened. Proven to be guilty yet innocent was her case. Just like with the Donald Trump spying case.
She was PROVEN guilty, yet treated like innocent. Dealing with these idiots gets more and more tedious.
Guilty of breaking a rule no reasonable prosecuter would prosecute. Then there is Trump whom Mueller could not exhonerste of obstruction Because the DoJ made a new rule that you can not indict a sitting president.
Nope. More lies by you.This thread has NOTHING to do with Trump. FOCUSThanks for confirming my statement: guilty until proven innocent.Guilty until proven innocent is the leftwing standard.
Now I know you are a lying hypocrite.
Hilary Clinton
Barak Obama
Joe Biden
Both sides have been guilty of it. But can’t even admit it.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, she admitted to destroying the emails. Nothing happened. Proven to be guilty yet innocent was her case. Just like with the Donald Trump spying case.
She was PROVEN guilty, yet treated like innocent. Dealing with these idiots gets more and more tedious.
Guilty of breaking a rule no reasonable prosecuter would prosecute. Then there is Trump whom Mueller could not exhonerste of obstruction Because the DoJ made a new rule that you can not indict a sitting president.
This thread has EVERYTHING to do with Trump.
And Bill Clinton and JFKAnd if he wins, he will be following the Republican rapist in office.Hopeful Biden, the first rapist presidential candidate of the democrat party.
You mean like with Kavanaugh and Trump?You have to presuppose innocence. It is the way our justice system works: innocent until proven guilty. Not all countries are like that. I think it is a very important distinction.The idea that “all women must be believed” removes it from that, and presupposes guilt and innocence.
And you are presupposing innocence before any evidence is laid to bear. I myself don't think one phone call to Larry King is enough evidence, and the rightists on this board are presupposing guilt. Both you and they are doing the exact same thing and for the same reason. Presupposition spits in the face of actual justice.
None of you are blameless. None. Of. You.
And I disagree it spits in the face of justice. Justice is taking the evidence and determining guilt or innocence through a jury system.
But you have to start from a base, either one is innocent and must prove guilt or one is guilty and must prove innocence.
What other base is there?
How can you post this shit?
In our system of justice, you are innocent until proven guilty. The fact that you don't understand that shows why you should be ridiculed and laughed at.
You have to presuppose innocence. It is the way our justice system works: innocent until proven guilty. Not all countries are like that. I think it is a very important distinction.The idea that “all women must be believed” removes it from that, and presupposes guilt and innocence.
And you are presupposing innocence before any evidence is laid to bear. I myself don't think one phone call to Larry King is enough evidence, and the rightists on this board are presupposing guilt. Both you and they are doing the exact same thing and for the same reason. Presupposition spits in the face of actual justice.
None of you are blameless. None. Of. You.
And I disagree it spits in the face of justice. Justice is taking the evidence and determining guilt or innocence through a jury system.
But you have to start from a base, either one is innocent and must prove guilt or one is guilty and must prove innocence.
What other base is there?
I think you should start with the story the victim is telling. Is it believeable, and I'm having a hard time believing this one.
I don't think you can attach a presumption of guilt with just a story. You need some evidence. Otherwise - both parties are equally deserving of belief.