Explain how this is an exoneration

[Mac1958]

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

Cuz Rush 'n Sean say so.
.

 

[boedicca]

Trump is facing no charges. Pelosi and Nadler are too weak to attempt impeachment.

Why get yourself worked up any longer. Time to move on. There is nothing more to argue about here.

Moron, YOU are the one bringing up impeachment of Trump.....I don't want that......Trump has not yet finished completely destroying the GOP....now split between decent republicans and Trump cult members......

The lingering suspicions that Trump is both corrupt and wholly inept to sit in the oval office, are BETTER than making him into a "martyr" threatened by impeachment.

Learn how to play chess instead of tiddlywinks

^^^ Oh.Teh.Irony ^^^

 

[nat4900]

Mueller didn't make a recommendation to indict Trump. Nuff said.

"Nuff said" by a moron.....and THAT is GOOD......go back to bed

Here. for smarter republicans......

The only thing standing between Trump & indictment is his presidential status......Nothing more

 

[bripat9643]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

No collusion, no obstruction, no evidence.

What part of that do you not understand, shit for brains?

 

[bripat9643]

Mueller didn't make a recommendation to indict Trump. Nuff said.

"Nuff said" by a moron.....and THAT is GOOD......go back to bed

Here. for smarter republicans......

The only thing standing between Trump & indictment is his presidential status......Nothing more

Wrong. There's also the utter lack of evidence, and the lack of any crime to justify starting the investigation.

 

[nat4900]

No collusion, no obstruction, no evidence.

Here MiddleFingerMoron....tell us WHERE you got that info. to come to that "brilliant" conclusion???

Certainly NOT from the Mueller report......LMAO

 

[Uncensored2008]

What Trump cult members FAIL to understand is this simple conclusion reached by Mueller......that is:

• IF TRUMP WERE NOT PRESIDENT, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED........

• Since Trump IS president, he CANNOT be indicted (based on DOJ policy)........

• WHEN Trump is NOT president, HE WILL BE INDICTED based EXACTLY on the same conclusions reached by Mueller's investigation..

If Trump had not been president, there would have been no Inquisition. This entire farce is predicated on the REFUSAL of you fuckwad Communists to ACCEPT the 2016 election.

And fuckwad, would you bet your left nut on Trump being indicted?



You're just a petulant, spoiled child throwing a tantrum because you didn't get your way.

 

[Mike473]

Mueller didn't make a recommendation to indict Trump. Nuff said.

"Nuff said" by a moron.....and THAT is GOOD......go back to bed

Here. for smarter republicans......

The only thing standing between Trump & indictment is his presidential status......Nothing more

Whatever the case may be, he just won a total victory. An innocent man has been vindicated. We can examine your argument on presidential status in 6 years or so when he leaves office. For now, lets celebrate what Trump has been able to achieve!

Trump really is remarkable. I had high expectations when he was elected. But, he has actually surpassed all my expectations while simultaneously putting down a coup attempt. Isn't it funny how great leaders seem to arrive just as they are needed.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Mueller didn't make a recommendation to indict Trump. Nuff said.

"Nuff said" by a moron.....and THAT is GOOD......go back to bed

Here. for smarter republicans......

The only thing standing between Trump & indictment is his presidential status......Nothing more

Wrong. There's also the utter lack of evidence, and the lack of any crime to justify starting the investigation.

Key point, there is NO crime, this was an illegal fishing expedition from the start.

 

[Rambunctious]

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

He is a free man and is still president....hows that for an explanation?.....

You guys are sounding really ridiculous now....you are like a SNL parody....a walking exaggeration....a joke....an out and out freaking joke....once seemingly intelligent people have suddenly gone completely nuts.....

 

[nat4900]

Key point,[/SIZE][/B] there is NO crime, this was an illegal fishing expedition from the start.

After "emitting" that "key point" make sure you flush and wash your hands......LOL

 

[nat4900]

Isn't it funny how great leaders seem to arrive just as they are needed.

With the exception of the word "funny".......the rest of that fcuked up statement is exactly what Erwin Rommel sated about his commander in chief.........LMAO

 

[Weatherman2020]

Mueller's report explains his prosecutorial decisions in four points.

1. The DOJ's OLC has issued the opinion that a sitting President cannot be indicted, and the SC accepted that opinion for the purposes of his investigation, further recognizing that a DOJ indictment might preempt the constitutional mechanism of impeachment.
2. The investigation was nevertheless warranted because an criminal investigation is permitted under the OLC's standard, even when an indictment is not. Other individuals engaging in obstruction could be prosecuted immediately. And the President is not immune from prosecution after leaving office, regardless of whether impeachment proceedings are brought or are successful. So the investigation served the purpose of preserving evidence while witness memories were fresh.
3. The normal public mechanism for an individual accused of a crime to clear themselves is a speedy public criminal trial. If the sitting President cannot be brought to a criminal trial while in office, then it would be unfair for the SC to affirmatively accuse him of a crime that cannot be prosecuted in a criminal court of law at this time. Even a sealed indictment's secrecy could not be guaranteed to be preserved. Accordingly, a criminal accusation against a sitting President could be harmful to the country, because the accusation cannot be resolved in the normal adversarial manner of a criminal trial.
   
4. The results of the investigation do not allow the SC to conclude that the President did not commit obstruction.

So please explain how this exonerates Donald?

In America we have to prove guilt, not innocence, Comrade.

 

[Mike473]

Isn't it funny how great leaders seem to arrive just as they are needed.

With the exception of the word "funny".......the rest of that fcuked up statement is exactly what Erwin Rommel sated about his commander in chief.........LMAO

I am proud of the outstanding job Bill Barr has done as AG. Coming out of retirement to serve the country and clean up the coup attempt. Barr & Mueller have vindicated an innocent man and justice has prevailed at last. We have a lot to be thankful for as Americans today. Good has once again prevailed over evil.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Isn't it funny how great leaders seem to arrive just as they are needed.

With the exception of the word "funny".......the rest of that fcuked up statement is exactly what Erwin Rommel sated about his commander in chief.........LMAO

Rommel thought Hitler was a moron and tried to assassinate him.

If you Leftards learned a little history you’d be conservative too.

 

[nat4900]

Rommel thought Hitler was a moron and tried to assassinate him.

Asshole........Rommel turned on Hitler AFTER the Nazi fuck up in Russia......

If you weren't such an ignorant idiot you'd know that Rommel "loved" Hitler until 1941.....

Please don't be such a Trump ass kisser by flaunting your ignorance.

 

[nat4900]

In America we have to prove guilt, not innocence, Comrade.

GREAT "defense' of Hillary Clinton, also????................LMAO

 

[Weatherman2020]

In America we have to prove guilt, not innocence, Comrade.

GREAT "defense' of Hillary Clinton, also????................LMAO

Want to link to anyone claiming Hillary needed to proven not guilty?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Rommel thought Hitler was a moron and tried to assassinate him.

Asshole........Rommel turned on Hitler AFTER the Nazi fuck up in Russia......

If you weren't such an ignorant idiot you'd know that Rommel "loved" Hitler until 1941.....

Please don't be such a Trump ass kisser by flaunting your ignorance.

Don’t know much about any history I see.

 

[nat4900]

Rommel thought Hitler was a moron and tried to assassinate him.

Asshole........Rommel turned on Hitler AFTER the Nazi fuck up in Russia......

If you weren't such an ignorant idiot you'd know that Rommel "loved" Hitler until 1941.....

Please don't be such a Trump ass kisser by flaunting your ignorance.

Don’t know much about any history I see.

Not for ignorant morons like you.....you're beyond help........But for others....

(Stop diverting this thread, dimwit)

Throughout the 1930s, Rommel develops a close working relationship with Hitler, whom he initially comes to admire for progressively thwarting the Versailles Treaty and restoring Germany's strength. He is seen more and more by Hitler side.

Erwin Rommel