Explain to me the legislative purpose

[RetiredGySgt]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

 

[candycorn]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

Really? Cite the statute.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

Really? Cite the statute.

Court has so ruled sorry but already cited numerous times and you know it.

 

[candycorn]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

Really? Cite the statute.

Court has so ruled sorry but already cited numerous times and you know it.

Put another way; you can't cite the statute you pretend exists.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

Really? Cite the statute.

Court has so ruled sorry but already cited numerous times and you know it.

Put another way; you can't cite the statute you pretend exists.

Stated another way quit trolling when you already have your answer.

 

[Dekster]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

I could come up with one in theory but in reality the dems are going fishing

 

[kyzr]

They got old tax returns for Trump from the 1980s, he had write-offs of over a $billion. The dems are saying that Trump "lost" over a $billion. You can't write-off more than you spent, so that's probably why Trump doesn't want his returns publicized. You build it, you write it off.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

They got old tax returns for Trump from the 1980s, he had write-offs of over a $billion. The dems are saying that Trump "lost" over a $billion. You can't write-off more than you spent, so that's probably why Trump doesn't want his returns publicized. You build it, you write it off.

So you think the IRS was incompetent when it came to Trump and would not catch that? What fantasy world do you live in?

 

[Pogo]

They got old tax returns for Trump from the 1980s, he had write-offs of over a $billion. The dems are saying that Trump "lost" over a $billion. You can't write-off more than you spent, so that's probably why Trump doesn't want his returns publicized. You build it, you write it off.

So you think the IRS was incompetent when it came to Trump and would not catch that? What fantasy world do you live in?

Who suggested IRS didn't catch it?

 

[Moonglow]

They want to see if there is any conflict of interest with the emoluments.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

They got old tax returns for Trump from the 1980s, he had write-offs of over a $billion. The dems are saying that Trump "lost" over a $billion. You can't write-off more than you spent, so that's probably why Trump doesn't want his returns publicized. You build it, you write it off.

So you think the IRS was incompetent when it came to Trump and would not catch that? What fantasy world do you live in?

Who suggested IRS didn't catch it?

Then there would have been charges you loon ot=r are you saying Obama went soft on Trump?

 

[kyzr]

They got old tax returns for Trump from the 1980s, he had write-offs of over a $billion. The dems are saying that Trump "lost" over a $billion. You can't write-off more than you spent, so that's probably why Trump doesn't want his returns publicized. You build it, you write it off.

So you think the IRS was incompetent when it came to Trump and would not catch that? What fantasy world do you live in?

On your side, just saying that the MSM spins tax returns any way they want. In this case, Trump is a loser, he lost biillions. He must have gotten money from the Russians, and now they own him.

 

[Lewdog]

They want to see if there is any conflict of interest with the emoluments.

And if he told the truth on his financial disclosure forms...

 

[candycorn]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

Really? Cite the statute.

Court has so ruled sorry but already cited numerous times and you know it.

Put another way; you can't cite the statute you pretend exists.

Stated another way quit trolling when you already have your answer.

Its okay. Just admit you're making stuff up. You're a Trump supporter....such behavior is expected.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Exactly WHAT legislative purpose does Trumps Tax info come under? You all understand that in order to request them the Congress must provide a legislative purpose and that ONLY in PRIVATE Executive meeting can they be viewed?

Really? Cite the statute.

Court has so ruled sorry but already cited numerous times and you know it.

Put another way; you can't cite the statute you pretend exists.

Stated another way quit trolling when you already have your answer.

Its okay. Just admit you're making stuff up. You're a Trump supporter....such behavior is expected.

It's ok just admit you are trolling and your question has been answered dozens of times on other threads.

 

[beautress]

Why is it that for regular citizens, you cannot sue them for information that is 7 years old, but for Presidents, there is no cut off, not ever? Aren't they citizens with the same rights as everyone else?

I think it's wrong for the Congress to ignore all its duties in order to get rid of a President who was elected under the laws of the United States of America.

School children don't understand it either, and after seeing some of the news broadcasts of condemnation against people who run the government, so they get the impression they can get away with stuff, too, and go on killing sprees with guns in schools.

The adults just blame each other for these aberrations from normal behaviors. I'm sorry for this nation, because it looks like there's a rift that can only be resolved by means of war. Immature people are not afraid of war, and the upset in schools may be because of the failure of Congress to obey its own laws, protocols, and tradition. What's it gonna be? The Democrat Party has designated itself as the only way to nirvana.

I say it is not up to the government to create nirvana. It's the job of the government to unite together for the benefit of the American people. All else is dross.