🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Facebook yanks page of 12-year-old conservative who said Obama doesn't love U.S

This is scary that facebook silences freedom of speech. I know that fascist in the democratic party certainly don't want anyone speaking up against them.


Knee jerk reaction.

How did they "silence freedom of speech"?

Next thing you know Facebook will refuse to allow gay wedding photos!

Then you Leftists will scream and holler they don't have the "RIGHT" to do that.

They might not.

You will. You can't help yourselves, the same assholes that sue people for not providing artistic talent for your homo weddings.
 
One reason why Black Conservatism continues to grow is because of Obama & friends and their failure to prove that Black Liberalism is a better option.

Plus, the WISER blacks are understanding that the democrats pander to them and patronize them for their votes.

They fully understand they are nothing but pawns to the democrats. Liberals, (marxist/socialists that we call liberals) are nothing but patronzing racist hacks. All of them. No exceptions.

Liberals are actually more racist than any other political group because they assume that blacks can't take care of themselves and think for themselves. Instead of encouraging blacks to prosper, seek higher education, and produce they've decided that it's better to remove any and all self-motivation by giving them free handouts in trade for votes. Wise blacks see through this smokescreen.

Whoa! I've never heard it put that way before. I'm going to rethink my entire political philosophy. All this time....it's the GOP that has worked hard on behalf of minorities! Gee whiz!

Republicans had more to do with freeing the slaves that Democrat KKKers. Right? And why is it that prosperous blacks tend to be conservative while poverty-stricken blacks lean Democrat?

Everything, and I mean everything the republicans (the conservatives) have accomplished the left wingers (marxist/socialists who we call liberals) claims it was actually them.

They think Eisenhower (who desegregated the schools) was somehow a liberal. They think Reagan was a liberal who signed MLK Day as an official holiday?

This also goes for environment. Yes, they claim Teddy Roosevelt as one of their own, even though he believed in a strong military and if was president today, the middle east would not exist. Roosevelt did more for conservation than any liberal would dream of in 10 lifetimes.

They sure as shit do not know a thing about GW Bush and his contributions to the environment. Bush’s signature on wilderness legislation added nearly 2.5 million acres to the National Wilderness Preservation System.

Bush’s action was the most sweeping use of the Antiquities Act since this somewhat obscure but highly effective conservation law was enacted in 1906.

Combined with the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument, which Bush designated in 2006, his marine preserves are equal in size to the combined extent of all national parks, national wildlife refuges, and the National Landscape Conservation System, plus 9 million acres in change.

Every acre is a wonderful legacy. More importantly, Bush’s actions have given impetus to the emerging recognition that special places at sea deserve the highest levels of protection, akin to national parks and wilderness areas on land.

That only goes to show the hypocrisy of the liberal (marxist/socialists who we call liberals) in how they do not care one bit about the environment. Could not possibly care less. Not only do they not know about that contribution, they could not care less if they tried.

Instead, this is your classic fucking marxist moron.



^^^Look at that. Just look at that.

Say what? What bill did Eisenhower sign into law, or what executive order did he sign, to desegregate schools? It was the Judicial branch which desegregated schools, with landmark cases like Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka. To Eisenhower's credit, he enforced the law when the state's governor would not.
 
The article calls him a 12 year old conservative?

lol, that's a rarity. Most of the conservatives on USMB are about 8 years old.
Funny you should say that, most of the liberals on USMB are in there 40s and act like 6 year olds
in a vain attempt to out do nycarbineer in pointing out immaturity in others, bear513 resorts to 'I know you are but what am I?'

:lmao:
 
Wait, I thought the left was the champion of tolerance and free speech?

Are you admitting the Right isn't? That is so funny. You people should learn to think before you post.

Are you still drunk from last night?

Do you believe a baker has to make a cake for a gay couple?

No! A baker should be able to serve - legally, morally and spiritually - who he/she is willing to serve.

I suspect you would be less righteous if the question was: Should a Syrian/Lebanese/Arabic/Iraqi restaurant be forced to prepare and serve pork, against their religious beliefs as you demand that decent people should - by force of law - serve the demands of people who they disagree with.

When the country sides with the ideas of Johnny-come-lately misconstrued and degenerate, 7th century pedophiliac, rapist, misogynist and Satanist, kill crazy, slavery-promoting so-called "religion" you know that the country is in trouble.
 
This young lad must have hit a nerve. Facebook is as communist as they come



On Friday, C.J. Pearson, a 12-year-old conservative from Georgia who posted a viral video supporting Rudy Giuliani, discovered that his personal Facebook page was locked. In an exclusive interview with Examiner.com on Saturday, Pearson said he received a message from someone about 6 a.m. Friday. That's when he learned his account and page had been locked for "suspicious activity."

He jumped through all of Facebook's hoops, but wasn't able to recover his account. So he created a new profile to take its place. His public page was not affected, he said, however, he can no longer administer the page. Fortunately, he said, a friend is helping post links to that page.

Facebook yanks page of 12-year-old conservative who said Obama doesn t love U.S. - National Policy Issues Examiner.com
Well the FCC does have full control over the internet now.
 
Remember no Progressive leader ever campaigned on slavery and mass murder. They start off talking about the 1% and how they will make things better once they collect all your weapons
 
Facebook is part of the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media.

It's often where our dimocrap scum get their GOTV directions from -- From one cell to another.

Facebook is a pushole and I don't participate, join, play or whatever you call it.

Fuck them
Yeah! Damn librul Facebook. :lol:
 
I do agree government control of the internet is a horrible thing and dangerous for a free internet this has NOTHING to do with that

How do we know the FCC didn't already use its regulatory powers to issue a letter/e-mail to Facebook instructing him to close the account because he was "underage."
 
Wait, I thought the left was the champion of tolerance and free speech?

Are you admitting the Right isn't? That is so funny. You people should learn to think before you post.

Are you still drunk from last night?

Do you believe a baker has to make a cake for a gay couple?

No! A baker should be able to serve - legally, morally and spiritually - who he/she is willing to serve.

I suspect you would be less righteous if the question was: Should a Syrian/Lebanese/Arabic/Iraqi restaurant be forced to prepare and serve pork, against their religious beliefs as you demand that decent people should - by force of law - serve the demands of people who they disagree with.

When the country sides with the ideas of Johnny-come-lately misconstrued and degenerate, 7th century pedophiliac, rapist, misogynist and Satanist, kill crazy, slavery-promoting so-called "religion" you know that the country is in trouble.

Public accommodation laws have nothing to do with forcing business to stock certain items. I can't go into Office Depot, demand Osso Buco, and claim they violated PA laws b/c they refused to serve me. If they did offer that dish and refused to serve to you on the basis of race, religion, etc you than you would have a case. I do not know many times this has to be dispelled before people actually understand the law.
 
Last edited:
Wait, I thought the left was the champion of tolerance and free speech?

Are you admitting the Right isn't? That is so funny. You people should learn to think before you post.

Are you still drunk from last night?

Do you believe a baker has to make a cake for a gay couple?

No! A baker should be able to serve - legally, morally and spiritually - who he/she is willing to serve.

I suspect you would be less righteous if the question was: Should a Syrian/Lebanese/Arabic/Iraqi restaurant be forced to prepare and serve pork, against their religious beliefs as you demand that decent people should - by force of law - serve the demands of people who they disagree with.

When the country sides with the ideas of Johnny-come-lately misconstrued and degenerate, 7th century pedophiliac, rapist, misogynist and Satanist, kill crazy, slavery-promoting so-called "religion" you know that the country is in trouble.

Public accommodation laws have nothing to do with forcing business to stock certain items. I can't go into Office Depot, demand Osso Buco, and claim they violated PA laws b/c they refused to serve me. If they did offer that dish and refused to serve to you on the basis of race, religion, etc you than you would have a case. I do not know many times this has to be dispelled before people actually understand the law.

OK, so if I go to an Arabic/Muslim/Islamic restaurant that serves FOOD should I not be able to demand pork, you know, to serve my demands, similar to those who demanded flower from a florist and cake from a baker who had their own beliefs but were crucified for them.

Decent people don't go for accommodation to places where - based on their own beliefs and the beliefs of the business - know that they would meet resistance. Only the obstinate, obnoxious, idiotic, obtuse, objectionable, stupid and politically correct and trouble-rousing scum with an axe to grind would do something like that.
 
This young lad must have hit a nerve. Facebook is as communist as they come



On Friday, C.J. Pearson, a 12-year-old conservative from Georgia who posted a viral video supporting Rudy Giuliani, discovered that his personal Facebook page was locked. In an exclusive interview with Examiner.com on Saturday, Pearson said he received a message from someone about 6 a.m. Friday. That's when he learned his account and page had been locked for "suspicious activity."

He jumped through all of Facebook's hoops, but wasn't able to recover his account. So he created a new profile to take its place. His public page was not affected, he said, however, he can no longer administer the page. Fortunately, he said, a friend is helping post links to that page.

Facebook yanks page of 12-year-old conservative who said Obama doesn t love U.S. - National Policy Issues Examiner.com


you have to be 13 to have a fb account

I'm 58 and I posted it, let's see what happens ;)
What happens is you're just as ridiculous as the 12 year old, and just as wrong as every other rightwing nitwit who propagates the same lie.

I don't know if it was a lie or not,my page however is still there.

As for being wrong, you have me confuzzled with you.

You are wrong about pretty much everything.
 
Wait, I thought the left was the champion of tolerance and free speech?

Are you admitting the Right isn't? That is so funny. You people should learn to think before you post.

Are you still drunk from last night?

Do you believe a baker has to make a cake for a gay couple?

Depends, are they a low life scum militant gay couple just trying to stir up trouble?
 
Are you admitting the Right isn't? That is so funny. You people should learn to think before you post.

Are you still drunk from last night?

Do you believe a baker has to make a cake for a gay couple?

No! A baker should be able to serve - legally, morally and spiritually - who he/she is willing to serve.

I suspect you would be less righteous if the question was: Should a Syrian/Lebanese/Arabic/Iraqi restaurant be forced to prepare and serve pork, against their religious beliefs as you demand that decent people should - by force of law - serve the demands of people who they disagree with.

When the country sides with the ideas of Johnny-come-lately misconstrued and degenerate, 7th century pedophiliac, rapist, misogynist and Satanist, kill crazy, slavery-promoting so-called "religion" you know that the country is in trouble.

Public accommodation laws have nothing to do with forcing business to stock certain items. I can't go into Office Depot, demand Osso Buco, and claim they violated PA laws b/c they refused to serve me. If they did offer that dish and refused to serve to you on the basis of race, religion, etc you than you would have a case. I do not know many times this has to be dispelled before people actually understand the law.

OK, so if I go to an Arabic/Muslim/Islamic restaurant that serves FOOD should I not be able to demand pork, you know, to serve my demands, similar to those who demanded flower from a florist and cake from a baker who had their own beliefs but were crucified for them.

Decent people don't go for accommodation to places where - based on their own beliefs and the beliefs of the business - know that they would meet resistance. Only the obstinate, obnoxious, idiotic, obtuse, objectionable, stupid and politically correct and trouble-rousing scum with an axe to grind would do something like that.

Tell ya what, go into an Muslism owned restaurant, demand a pork chop, if they don't carry the dish storm out and file a complaint with the state claiming they violated PA laws. After the uproarious laughter subsides you'll be promptly shown the door.

You are free to remain as ignorant as wish concerning how the law actually works in regards to public accommodation. You have that right but do not expect the rest of us to follow suit.
 
Last edited:
Are you admitting the Right isn't? That is so funny. You people should learn to think before you post.

Are you still drunk from last night?

Do you believe a baker has to make a cake for a gay couple?

No! A baker should be able to serve - legally, morally and spiritually - who he/she is willing to serve.

I suspect you would be less righteous if the question was: Should a Syrian/Lebanese/Arabic/Iraqi restaurant be forced to prepare and serve pork, against their religious beliefs as you demand that decent people should - by force of law - serve the demands of people who they disagree with.

When the country sides with the ideas of Johnny-come-lately misconstrued and degenerate, 7th century pedophiliac, rapist, misogynist and Satanist, kill crazy, slavery-promoting so-called "religion" you know that the country is in trouble.

Public accommodation laws have nothing to do with forcing business to stock certain items. I can't go into Office Depot, demand Osso Buco, and claim they violated PA laws b/c they refused to serve me. If they did offer that dish and refused to serve to you on the basis of race, religion, etc you than you would have a case. I do not know many times this has to be dispelled before people actually understand the law.

OK, so if I go to an Arabic/Muslim/Islamic restaurant that serves FOOD should I not be able to demand pork, you know, to serve my demands, similar to those who demanded flower from a florist and cake from a baker who had their own beliefs but were crucified for them.

Decent people don't go for accommodation to places where - based on their own beliefs and the beliefs of the business - know that they would meet resistance. Only the obstinate, obnoxious, idiotic, obtuse, objectionable, stupid and politically correct and trouble-rousing scum with an axe to grind would do something like that.

Exactly, decent people don't demand that a Jewish establishment prepare a Christmas dinner or decorate a batch of Easter eggs, out of respect. These militant gays however have no class.
 
So...to sum it all up, FB yanked the kid's page because he was underage. It had nothing whatsoever to do with what he said.

Major thread fail.

funny-pictures-fail-cat-paw.jpg
That's not what the article said. And since FB isn't forthcoming about their reasons you have no justification for that assumption.

Facebooks policy: How do I report a child under the age of 13 Facebook Help Center Facebook
 

Forum List

Back
Top