Faced With A BOOMING Economy To run Against, Dims Try To Argue Success / More Jobs = BAD

[Faun]

Great, what policies did Democrats pass in 2007 that “drove the economy in the ditch?” Show the forum just how ignorant you are....

Riiiiight Dem's didn't projective vomit doom and gloom for 2 straight years to improve their chances of winning in 2008 riiiiiight.

Actually, by 2006, record numbers of foreclosures were already being recorded. The weight of those foreclosures led to the collapse of New Century Financial Corp., the nation’s leading lender of subprime loans, which filed for chapter 11 in April, 2007, from years of writing toxic subprime loans. Thd damage was done by 2007, before Democrats took control of the Congress.

Thanks for obliging and demonstrating your abject ignorance.

Lib please we have been all through this. President Bush tried to address this issue multiple times and Dem's were united in opposition claiming everything was hunky dory. The Barney Frank video has been posted a dozen times proving this. I won't debate your made up revisionist propaganda the facts are well known.

You moron... Democrats were the minority party and didn’t prevent the Congress from responding to Bush’s warnings. Republicans did that. Anyone who posts the Barney Frank video proves they’re an idiot since Barney Frank, as a sole member of the minority party, was utterly helpless to block any GOP legislation. He didn’t have to since only one bill passed in the House and it was President Bush, not Barney Frank, who rejected that bill. Not to mention, Barney Frank rushed to pass GSE reform after Democrats took control in 2007, introducing H.R.1427 in March, 2007, as Bush requested from Congress.

I never read posts that start with 'you moron.'...........

LOL

As if your review was necessary for my reply to shoot that nonsense down.

Run, Forrest! Run!!!

 

[Leo123]

Modern Democrats are Marxist. They hate individual Capitalists and deny that exceptionalism and monetary reward gives people the most freedom. They do not like exceptionalism.....unless......It conforms to their stated goals. Democratic Socialism is a path to destruction. Democratic Socialists want everyone with money to be an 'oppressor' and demand power over their ability to spend their money as a free Americans. IOW Marxism is a SCAM.

Actually we are very good Americans, many of whom are very rich and want the best for the country and to pay more in taxes. You are an ignoramus Dupe of greedy asshole rich people... Thanks for the stupidest Wars ever and the world depression and a trade War now...

so pay more in taxes. in fact pay mine. you like doing that so well.

Great knee-jerk brainwashed pseudo opinion, super duper. Democrats only want the rich to pay more, super dupe. And lots of help for the rest of us...

Democrats, however, never really define who the 'rich' are and they increase taxes on the average American. If they really wanted to tax the 'rich' they'd tax the Soros foundations to the max.

Still over $250,000, super duper. Soros foundations are non-profit and nothing like you think they are... They are for democracy and transparency and he was never a Nazi LOL.
.

Soros hides behind his foundations and funds radical neo-Marxists.

 

[Papageorgio]

Frank and Dodd were in the minority party until 2007. They had no power until then, Republicans did. And in most of those instances where you show Bush asking Congress to reform the GSE’s, Republicans were in running the Congress and in charge of all the committees. And by 2007, the damage was done. By early 2007, foreclosures were through the roof and at least one major lender had filed for bankruptcy.

Despite imploring the Republican-led Congress to reform the GSE’s and getting nowhere, he still passes the laws making up his home ownership plan.

”Thank to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high!” ~ George Bush, 2004 Republican National Convention

The damage was done by 2001. From there it was downhill. I have been a Realtor here in Florida since 1974. I am intimately familiar with the events leading up to the Democrat-driven housing/mortgage/financial collapse beginning in July 2007.

Please note that there is no mention, whatsoever of the creditworthiness of the applicants denied a mortgage, only their race.

HUD TO FIGHT DISCRIMINATION, BOOST MINORITY HOMEOWNERSHIP AND WORK WITH URBAN LEAGUE TO FURTHER GOALS


WASHINGTON - The Clinton Administration is committed to fighting illegal housing discrimination and to giving more minorities opportunities to become homeowners, Housing Secretary Andrew Cuomo told the National Urban League Annual Conference today. At the same time, he signed an agreement to work with the Urban League to further those goals.


Cuomo spoke a day after banking regulators issued a report that found that conventional and government-backed home mortgages to all racial and ethnic groups rose in 1996.


However, the report found that blacks, Hispanics and American Indians were still more likely than whites and Asians to be turned down for conventional home mortgages.


The report said in 1996 lenders turned down 48.8 percent of applications for conventional home mortgages by African Americans, compared with only 24.1 percent for whites. The denial rates were 34.4 percent for Hispanics, 13.8 percent for Asians, and 50.2 percent for American Indians.


Still, the disparity in mortgage denial rates for blacks and whites has narrowed since 1990. In that year, blacks were 2.4 times as likely as whites to have their application denied. Today, blacks are 2 times as likely to have their mortgage applications denied.


"We are proud that minority homeownership is rising and that more Americans of all races are applying and qualifying for home mortgages," Cuomo said. "But more must be done to stop discrimination in its tracks. We will double the number of fair housing complaints we investigate and we will be diligent in our enforcement of laws and regulations to ensure that the American Dream of homeownership is open to all hard-working Americans."

Cuomo said a top goal of HUD will be to reduce the homeownership gap between whites and minorities. While the white homeownership rate stood at 72.1 percent in the second quarter of this year, the homeownership rate was 44.9 percent for blacks and 43.3 percent for Hispanics.


To advance HUD's efforts, Cuomo said the Department of Housing and Urban Development will provide technical assistance valued at up to $1 million to the National Urban League and its 114 affiliates over two years.


The HUD assistance will help the group increase minority homeownership, create more affordable housing, combat housing discrimination, create jobs and take other actions to revitalize inner city neighborhoods, Cuomo said.


Cuomo signed a memorandum of understanding with Urban League President Hugh Price to provide the technical assistance.


Under the agreement, HUD will work with local Urban League affiliates to identify ways to wipe out housing discrimination. All cases of housing discrimination discovered by Urban League affiliates will be referred to the Department for immediate investigation.


Cuomo said the assistance will help the National Urban League and its affiliates better utilize available HUD resources and programs, such as the Department's Community Development Block Grant Program.

"The Urban League is a powerful force for good, and has an extraordinary record of achievement," Cuomo said. "By working in partnership with this group, HUD can create new housing opportunities and new jobs, and bring new life to urban neighborhoods."


"We're extremely excited about the creation of this partnership with HUD," Price said. "This agreement will enable us to do even more to serve the needs of communities that are undergoing tremendous change and becoming ever more diverse."


Despite the disappointing news about the high mortgage denial rate for minorities, the data revealed a number of encouraging trends, Cuomo said. For example: In 1996, the number of blacks owning their own homes exceeded 5 million for the first time.


There has been substantial growth in total mortgage lending activity since 1993. The fastest growth in mortgage lending has occurred for minorities: 56 percent for Hispanics, 53 percent for blacks, 27 percent for Native Americans, 15 percent for Asians and 14 percent for whites.


While the number of conventional loans to blacks decreased by 1.5 percent between 1995 and 1996, this decline was more than offset by an increase in government-backed loans.


Today the overall homeownership rate in the United States is 65.7 percent -- the highest overall quarterly homeownership rate in 17 years. There are more than 5 million more homeowners since the start of 1993.


Under the agreement between HUD and the Urban League, Neighborhood Network Centers will be established in Baltimore, Washington, and Kansas City, MO. The Neighborhoods Network program, created in September 1995, is a HUD initiative that uses computer technology to help residents of HUD-insured and assisted housing developments get training to qualify for jobs. Currently there are more than 220 Neighborhood Networks centers operating.


Another goal of HUD's assistance to the Urban League will be to help people move from welfare to work. Activities that could be assisted include job training, child care and transportation to jobs.


The agreement also calls for HUD to help Urban League affiliates fully engage in the JOBS Plus Demonstration Program, an effort that uses existing local structures to strengthen the ability of communities to support and promote activities leading to the creation of new jobs.


In addition, the agreement calls for HUD to assist Urban League affiliates in working with local housing authorities to develop job training courses for low-income residents and contracting opportunities for businesses that are owned by or employ public housing residents.


Content Archived: January 20, 2009

HUD Archives: Cuomo agrees w/Nat'l Urban League -- to Fight Housing Discrimination

The damage was not done by 2001. Had it been, the economy would have collapsed years before it did. There were some factors which contributed negligibly, but they were not the cause. It wasn’t necessary for you to demonstrate again that you don’t know what you’re talking about; but thanks just the same.

The damage didn’t even begin until interest rates dropped to below 2% and then the explosion of securitized subprime loans, as MBS’s and CDO’s, went through the roof. That was between 2002-2006...

”Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high!” ~ George Bush, 2004 Republican National Convention

Tons of people to blame, not just one party but a system wide failure.
The 2008 Meltdown And Where The Blame Falls

Who to blame for the Great Recession? So many big names are in the frame

Only partisan nuts are blaming one party.

 

[jc456]

Modern Democrats are Marxist. They hate individual Capitalists and deny that exceptionalism and monetary reward gives people the most freedom. They do not like exceptionalism.....unless......It conforms to their stated goals. Democratic Socialism is a path to destruction. Democratic Socialists want everyone with money to be an 'oppressor' and demand power over their ability to spend their money as a free Americans. IOW Marxism is a SCAM.

Actually we are very good Americans, many of whom are very rich and want the best for the country and to pay more in taxes. You are an ignoramus Dupe of greedy asshole rich people... Thanks for the stupidest Wars ever and the world depression and a trade War now...

so pay more in taxes. in fact pay mine. you like doing that so well.

Great knee-jerk brainwashed pseudo opinion, super duper. Democrats only want the rich to pay more, super dupe. And lots of help for the rest of us...

No no, you all want to.

Guess how much Trumps daughter will pay with all her made in china clothing with daddy's tariff crap?? YES you got it JC ,,,,,,, NOTHING ,,,,,,And she's NEVER had anything made in America Doubt the orange AH has either

Cause you think you know! HAHA

 

[jc456]

Frank and Dodd were in the minority party until 2007. They had no power until then, Republicans did. And in most of those instances where you show Bush asking Congress to reform the GSE’s, Republicans were in running the Congress and in charge of all the committees. And by 2007, the damage was done. By early 2007, foreclosures were through the roof and at least one major lender had filed for bankruptcy.

Despite imploring the Republican-led Congress to reform the GSE’s and getting nowhere, he still passes the laws making up his home ownership plan.

”Thank to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high!” ~ George Bush, 2004 Republican National Convention

The damage was done by 2001. From there it was downhill. I have been a Realtor here in Florida since 1974. I am intimately familiar with the events leading up to the Democrat-driven housing/mortgage/financial collapse beginning in July 2007.

Please note that there is no mention, whatsoever of the creditworthiness of the applicants denied a mortgage, only their race.

HUD TO FIGHT DISCRIMINATION, BOOST MINORITY HOMEOWNERSHIP AND WORK WITH URBAN LEAGUE TO FURTHER GOALS


WASHINGTON - The Clinton Administration is committed to fighting illegal housing discrimination and to giving more minorities opportunities to become homeowners, Housing Secretary Andrew Cuomo told the National Urban League Annual Conference today. At the same time, he signed an agreement to work with the Urban League to further those goals.


Cuomo spoke a day after banking regulators issued a report that found that conventional and government-backed home mortgages to all racial and ethnic groups rose in 1996.


However, the report found that blacks, Hispanics and American Indians were still more likely than whites and Asians to be turned down for conventional home mortgages.


The report said in 1996 lenders turned down 48.8 percent of applications for conventional home mortgages by African Americans, compared with only 24.1 percent for whites. The denial rates were 34.4 percent for Hispanics, 13.8 percent for Asians, and 50.2 percent for American Indians.


Still, the disparity in mortgage denial rates for blacks and whites has narrowed since 1990. In that year, blacks were 2.4 times as likely as whites to have their application denied. Today, blacks are 2 times as likely to have their mortgage applications denied.


"We are proud that minority homeownership is rising and that more Americans of all races are applying and qualifying for home mortgages," Cuomo said. "But more must be done to stop discrimination in its tracks. We will double the number of fair housing complaints we investigate and we will be diligent in our enforcement of laws and regulations to ensure that the American Dream of homeownership is open to all hard-working Americans."

Cuomo said a top goal of HUD will be to reduce the homeownership gap between whites and minorities. While the white homeownership rate stood at 72.1 percent in the second quarter of this year, the homeownership rate was 44.9 percent for blacks and 43.3 percent for Hispanics.


To advance HUD's efforts, Cuomo said the Department of Housing and Urban Development will provide technical assistance valued at up to $1 million to the National Urban League and its 114 affiliates over two years.


The HUD assistance will help the group increase minority homeownership, create more affordable housing, combat housing discrimination, create jobs and take other actions to revitalize inner city neighborhoods, Cuomo said.


Cuomo signed a memorandum of understanding with Urban League President Hugh Price to provide the technical assistance.


Under the agreement, HUD will work with local Urban League affiliates to identify ways to wipe out housing discrimination. All cases of housing discrimination discovered by Urban League affiliates will be referred to the Department for immediate investigation.


Cuomo said the assistance will help the National Urban League and its affiliates better utilize available HUD resources and programs, such as the Department's Community Development Block Grant Program.

"The Urban League is a powerful force for good, and has an extraordinary record of achievement," Cuomo said. "By working in partnership with this group, HUD can create new housing opportunities and new jobs, and bring new life to urban neighborhoods."


"We're extremely excited about the creation of this partnership with HUD," Price said. "This agreement will enable us to do even more to serve the needs of communities that are undergoing tremendous change and becoming ever more diverse."


Despite the disappointing news about the high mortgage denial rate for minorities, the data revealed a number of encouraging trends, Cuomo said. For example: In 1996, the number of blacks owning their own homes exceeded 5 million for the first time.


There has been substantial growth in total mortgage lending activity since 1993. The fastest growth in mortgage lending has occurred for minorities: 56 percent for Hispanics, 53 percent for blacks, 27 percent for Native Americans, 15 percent for Asians and 14 percent for whites.


While the number of conventional loans to blacks decreased by 1.5 percent between 1995 and 1996, this decline was more than offset by an increase in government-backed loans.


Today the overall homeownership rate in the United States is 65.7 percent -- the highest overall quarterly homeownership rate in 17 years. There are more than 5 million more homeowners since the start of 1993.


Under the agreement between HUD and the Urban League, Neighborhood Network Centers will be established in Baltimore, Washington, and Kansas City, MO. The Neighborhoods Network program, created in September 1995, is a HUD initiative that uses computer technology to help residents of HUD-insured and assisted housing developments get training to qualify for jobs. Currently there are more than 220 Neighborhood Networks centers operating.


Another goal of HUD's assistance to the Urban League will be to help people move from welfare to work. Activities that could be assisted include job training, child care and transportation to jobs.


The agreement also calls for HUD to help Urban League affiliates fully engage in the JOBS Plus Demonstration Program, an effort that uses existing local structures to strengthen the ability of communities to support and promote activities leading to the creation of new jobs.


In addition, the agreement calls for HUD to assist Urban League affiliates in working with local housing authorities to develop job training courses for low-income residents and contracting opportunities for businesses that are owned by or employ public housing residents.


Content Archived: January 20, 2009

HUD Archives: Cuomo agrees w/Nat'l Urban League -- to Fight Housing Discrimination

The damage was not done by 2001. Had it been, the economy would have collapsed years before it did. There were some factors which contributed negligibly, but they were not the cause. It wasn’t necessary for you to demonstrate again that you don’t know what you’re talking about; but thanks just the same.

The damage didn’t even begin until interest rates dropped to below 2% and then the explosion of securitized subprime loans, as MBS’s and CDO’s, went through the roof. That was between 2002-2006...

”Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all-time high!” ~ George Bush, 2004 Republican National Convention

Tons of people to blame, not just one party but a system wide failure.
The 2008 Meltdown And Where The Blame Falls

Who to blame for the Great Recession? So many big names are in the frame

Only partisan nuts are blaming one party.

It’s only o remind the other party they to hold responsiblility!

 

[edward37]

Actually we are very good Americans, many of whom are very rich and want the best for the country and to pay more in taxes. You are an ignoramus Dupe of greedy asshole rich people... Thanks for the stupidest Wars ever and the world depression and a trade War now...

so pay more in taxes. in fact pay mine. you like doing that so well.

Great knee-jerk brainwashed pseudo opinion, super duper. Democrats only want the rich to pay more, super dupe. And lots of help for the rest of us...

No no, you all want to.

Guess how much Trumps daughter will pay with all her made in china clothing with daddy's tariff crap?? YES you got it JC ,,,,,,, NOTHING ,,,,,,And she's NEVER had anything made in America Doubt the orange AH has either

Cause you think you know! HAHA

I do

 

[francoHFW]

Actually we are very good Americans, many of whom are very rich and want the best for the country and to pay more in taxes. You are an ignoramus Dupe of greedy asshole rich people... Thanks for the stupidest Wars ever and the world depression and a trade War now...

so pay more in taxes. in fact pay mine. you like doing that so well.

Great knee-jerk brainwashed pseudo opinion, super duper. Democrats only want the rich to pay more, super dupe. And lots of help for the rest of us...

Democrats, however, never really define who the 'rich' are and they increase taxes on the average American. If they really wanted to tax the 'rich' they'd tax the Soros foundations to the max.

Still over $250,000, super duper. Soros foundations are non-profit and nothing like you think they are... They are for democracy and transparency and he was never a Nazi LOL.
.

Soros hides behind his foundations and funds radical neo-Marxists.

Too bad you have no evidence for that either, super duper.

 

[Leo123]

so pay more in taxes. in fact pay mine. you like doing that so well.

Great knee-jerk brainwashed pseudo opinion, super duper. Democrats only want the rich to pay more, super dupe. And lots of help for the rest of us...

Democrats, however, never really define who the 'rich' are and they increase taxes on the average American. If they really wanted to tax the 'rich' they'd tax the Soros foundations to the max.

Still over $250,000, super duper. Soros foundations are non-profit and nothing like you think they are... They are for democracy and transparency and he was never a Nazi LOL.
.

Soros hides behind his foundations and funds radical neo-Marxists.

Too bad you have no evidence for that either, super duper.

Too bad you don't do your research skippy.

 

[francoHFW]

Great knee-jerk brainwashed pseudo opinion, super duper. Democrats only want the rich to pay more, super dupe. And lots of help for the rest of us...

Democrats, however, never really define who the 'rich' are and they increase taxes on the average American. If they really wanted to tax the 'rich' they'd tax the Soros foundations to the max.

Still over $250,000, super duper. Soros foundations are non-profit and nothing like you think they are... They are for democracy and transparency and he was never a Nazi LOL.
.

Soros hides behind his foundations and funds radical neo-Marxists.

Too bad you have no evidence for that either, super duper.

Too bad you don't do your research skippy.

There is no evidence, just loudmouth GOP BS propaganda repeated endlessly... Super Super.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Why do you hate seeing Americans succeed?

This is the same economy that your propaganda machine called a disaster for 7 years, brainwashed functional moron.

LOL...do realize how desperate that sounds in light of all the good news regarding the economy and jobs?

Same thing as Obama's last seven years, super duper, and things are going wrong now trade War Etc... We'll see what happens..
Korea is a joke...

Hate to break it to ya super duper but things are coming up roses right now.
If they turn south you have a right ta bitch....until then STFU.

After 8 years of you bad-mouthing and obstructing the Obama recovery, F*** you and the horse you rode in on, brainwashed functional moron hater dupe... I said we'll see what happens... Breaking: trade Wars suck, so do 35 years of giveaway to the rich and garbage character assassination propaganda. Everything you know is garbage. GOP can't say economy without booming LOL. Under Obama it was disastrous. Same economy, dupe.

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

 

[edward37]

This is the same economy that your propaganda machine called a disaster for 7 years, brainwashed functional moron.

LOL...do realize how desperate that sounds in light of all the good news regarding the economy and jobs?

Same thing as Obama's last seven years, super duper, and things are going wrong now trade War Etc... We'll see what happens..
Korea is a joke...

Hate to break it to ya super duper but things are coming up roses right now.
If they turn south you have a right ta bitch....until then STFU.

After 8 years of you bad-mouthing and obstructing the Obama recovery, F*** you and the horse you rode in on, brainwashed functional moron hater dupe... I said we'll see what happens... Breaking: trade Wars suck, so do 35 years of giveaway to the rich and garbage character assassination propaganda. Everything you know is garbage. GOP can't say economy without booming LOL. Under Obama it was disastrous. Same economy, dupe.

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

 

[PoliticalChic]

LOL...do realize how desperate that sounds in light of all the good news regarding the economy and jobs?

Same thing as Obama's last seven years, super duper, and things are going wrong now trade War Etc... We'll see what happens..
Korea is a joke...

Hate to break it to ya super duper but things are coming up roses right now.
If they turn south you have a right ta bitch....until then STFU.

After 8 years of you bad-mouthing and obstructing the Obama recovery, F*** you and the horse you rode in on, brainwashed functional moron hater dupe... I said we'll see what happens... Breaking: trade Wars suck, so do 35 years of giveaway to the rich and garbage character assassination propaganda. Everything you know is garbage. GOP can't say economy without booming LOL. Under Obama it was disastrous. Same economy, dupe.

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

Obama was an abject failure at everything he tried....domestic and foreign policy.

Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?


And....perhaps you'd deign to answer this query:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....





Oh...and you need a bit of brushing up on your math.....

"Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president"

You forgot the decimal point in front of the digits.

 

[edward37]

Same thing as Obama's last seven years, super duper, and things are going wrong now trade War Etc... We'll see what happens..
Korea is a joke...

Hate to break it to ya super duper but things are coming up roses right now.
If they turn south you have a right ta bitch....until then STFU.

After 8 years of you bad-mouthing and obstructing the Obama recovery, F*** you and the horse you rode in on, brainwashed functional moron hater dupe... I said we'll see what happens... Breaking: trade Wars suck, so do 35 years of giveaway to the rich and garbage character assassination propaganda. Everything you know is garbage. GOP can't say economy without booming LOL. Under Obama it was disastrous. Same economy, dupe.

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

Obama was an abject failure at everything he tried....domestic and foreign policy.

Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?


And....perhaps you'd deign to answer this query:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....





Oh...and you need a bit of brushing up on your math.....

"Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president"

You forgot the decimal point in front of the digits.

How has dump prevented Iran from going nuclear?? I missed that Also NK laughed at your orange moron And now he's talking to his last friend in the world the murderer Putin ? Shame on you

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hate to break it to ya super duper but things are coming up roses right now.
If they turn south you have a right ta bitch....until then STFU.

After 8 years of you bad-mouthing and obstructing the Obama recovery, F*** you and the horse you rode in on, brainwashed functional moron hater dupe... I said we'll see what happens... Breaking: trade Wars suck, so do 35 years of giveaway to the rich and garbage character assassination propaganda. Everything you know is garbage. GOP can't say economy without booming LOL. Under Obama it was disastrous. Same economy, dupe.

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

Obama was an abject failure at everything he tried....domestic and foreign policy.

Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?


And....perhaps you'd deign to answer this query:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....





Oh...and you need a bit of brushing up on your math.....

"Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president"

You forgot the decimal point in front of the digits.

How has dump prevented Iran from going nuclear?? I missed that Also NK laughed at your orange moron And now he's talking to his last friend in the world the murderer Putin ? Shame on you

1. Why won't any of you Leftist robots answer the question???
Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?

Sooo.....you've admitted that Trump is a success....Hussein a failure.

Good.


2. "How has [President Trump] prevented Iran from going nuclear??"

From CNN:

"With one signature, President Donald Trump has dealt a major blow to Iran's already struggling economy.
Trump's decision to walk away from the nuclear deal is likely to cost Iran billions in foreign investment, slash growth, deter tourists and deprive its citizens of business opportunities."
US sanctions deal body blow to Iran's economy

"This is a setback on many levels," said Hassan Hakimian, director of the London Middle East Institute at SOAS. "It is bound to be disappointing in terms of the impact on the economic prospects for Iran, and particularly the youth."



3. Remember Pinocchio's lies?


June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...bc1fce-071d-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_print.html


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon - The Atlantic




His hatred of Jews was behind awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages.
You know that, don't you?

 

[edward37]

After 8 years of you bad-mouthing and obstructing the Obama recovery, F*** you and the horse you rode in on, brainwashed functional moron hater dupe... I said we'll see what happens... Breaking: trade Wars suck, so do 35 years of giveaway to the rich and garbage character assassination propaganda. Everything you know is garbage. GOP can't say economy without booming LOL. Under Obama it was disastrous. Same economy, dupe.

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

Obama was an abject failure at everything he tried....domestic and foreign policy.

Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?


And....perhaps you'd deign to answer this query:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....





Oh...and you need a bit of brushing up on your math.....

"Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president"

You forgot the decimal point in front of the digits.

How has dump prevented Iran from going nuclear?? I missed that Also NK laughed at your orange moron And now he's talking to his last friend in the world the murderer Putin ? Shame on you

1. Why won't any of you Leftist robots answer the question???
Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?

Sooo.....you've admitted that Trump is a success....Hussein a failure.

Good.


2. "How has [President Trump] prevented Iran from going nuclear??"

From CNN:

"With one signature, President Donald Trump has dealt a major blow to Iran's already struggling economy.
Trump's decision to walk away from the nuclear deal is likely to cost Iran billions in foreign investment, slash growth, deter tourists and deprive its citizens of business opportunities."
US sanctions deal body blow to Iran's economy

"This is a setback on many levels," said Hassan Hakimian, director of the London Middle East Institute at SOAS. "It is bound to be disappointing in terms of the impact on the economic prospects for Iran, and particularly the youth."



3. Remember Pinocchio's lies?


June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon - The Atlantic




His hatred of Jews was behind awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages.
You know that, don't you?

Obama hated Jews?? Now you've gone too far Have fun re selling that bridge

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was no "Obama recovery"

He took a recession, and managed to make it worse.


1. There was no great mess that Hussein inherited.....just the normal sort of downturn that any competent leader could have handled...

Who says so?

Left-leaning Reuters:

"The unemployment rate announced three days after his [Obama's] election was 6.5%....not particularly terrible. But it was the only economic news, and had Obama insisting we were suffering "the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression."
Obama: U.S. in worst crisis since Depression



2. Obama made it worse....in fact, worse AFTER the recession ended.

"Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession



3. Then, the Obamunists lied, and claimed that's just the way economies are...

“Team Obama: Sorry, America, the ‘new normal’ may be here to stay

The good times may be over for good. In a speech to the Economic Club of New York yesterday, US Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said the US GDP growth rate, adjusted for inflation, is now projected to run a little above 2% a year.”
Team Obama: Sorry, America, the 'new normal' may be here to stay - AEI




4. Then, along came Trump….

“U.S. households are back to their free spending ways, with the strength of May’s retail sales figures implying that second-quarter real consumption growth (and GDP growth for that matter) will now be more than 4% annualized.

With the benefit of the tax cuts, strong employment growth and a slow acceleration in hourly wage growth, consumption growth should remain strong going into the second half of this year,” Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics told MarketWatch.” US economy on track for 4% GDP growth?




5. Now.....whose record on the economy would you rather have....Trump's or Obama's??????

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

Obama was an abject failure at everything he tried....domestic and foreign policy.

Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?


And....perhaps you'd deign to answer this query:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....





Oh...and you need a bit of brushing up on your math.....

"Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president"

You forgot the decimal point in front of the digits.

How has dump prevented Iran from going nuclear?? I missed that Also NK laughed at your orange moron And now he's talking to his last friend in the world the murderer Putin ? Shame on you

1. Why won't any of you Leftist robots answer the question???
Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?

Sooo.....you've admitted that Trump is a success....Hussein a failure.

Good.


2. "How has [President Trump] prevented Iran from going nuclear??"

From CNN:

"With one signature, President Donald Trump has dealt a major blow to Iran's already struggling economy.
Trump's decision to walk away from the nuclear deal is likely to cost Iran billions in foreign investment, slash growth, deter tourists and deprive its citizens of business opportunities."
US sanctions deal body blow to Iran's economy

"This is a setback on many levels," said Hassan Hakimian, director of the London Middle East Institute at SOAS. "It is bound to be disappointing in terms of the impact on the economic prospects for Iran, and particularly the youth."



3. Remember Pinocchio's lies?


June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon - The Atlantic




His hatred of Jews was behind awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages.
You know that, don't you?

Obama hated Jews?? Now you've gone too far Have fun re selling that bridge

You know I'm never wrong, eddie.....


“Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite

• At least seven House Democrats are known to have direct ties to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
• Farrakhan is a notorious anti-Semite and racist
• A photo shows Barack Obama smiling with Farrakhan at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting in 2005

…Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite and racist who has called Jews “satanic” and said white people “deserve to die.”

California Reps. Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee, Illinois Rep. Danny Davis, Indiana Rep. Andre Carson, Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, New York Rep. Gregory Meeks and Texas Rep. Al Green have all attended meetings with Farrakhan while in Congress, according to photos, videos and witness accounts of the meetings reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Ellison, the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), repeatedly attended meetings with Farrakhan while in Congress, according to photos and videos reviewed by TheDCNF and Farrakhan’s own statements.

Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite [VIDEO]

If one is a Democrat and claims to subscribe to Judaism......something is wrong.


What sort of self-respect can a Jewish person have if they vote Democrat???

 

[Maxdeath]

You really have to feel sorry for them. When the stock market shot up after Trump was elected. They all yelled that it was 44's economy until the end of the fiscal year. When companies began to make commitments to move back to the U.S. they claimed it had been in the works for years. When companies gave out bonuses it was crumbs. When unemployment keeps going down it is still 44. When The stock market goes down it is all Trump. When it is pointed out that it is still up over when 44 left office that is because it was headed that way under 44.
In short they will attempt to give 44 and a relatively stagnet economy a standing ovation. But when Trump energizes the economy they will try anything to to keep from even giving it a slight nod. Then you get the staunch Trump haters that may go on a killing spree before long because they have become so irrational.

 

[Maxdeath]

You really have to feel sorry for the rabid Trump haters always yelling about the North Korea denuclearization. You can tell that they have never been in any negotiations or even read about them. It took how many years of talks for salt to finally be signed? How many years was the Iran deal, which should be called a joke, being negotiated? They all seem to think that one meeting and everything is signed, sealed, delivered.
They never mention the fact that their Messiah 44 never really did anything about North Korea. That Clinton actually helped by giving nuclear reactors for just a promise of denuclearization all while North Korea admitted to our ambassador that they were continuing to work toward nuclear weapons.

 

[edward37]

Since you're from Brooklyn I bet they sold you the Brooklyn bridge too,,,Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president this swine in the WH is

Obama was an abject failure at everything he tried....domestic and foreign policy.

Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?


And....perhaps you'd deign to answer this query:

What benefit did America, or the world, accrue by awarding nuclear weapons to the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism?

" Iran President Hassan Rouhani endorsed the agreement in a nationally broadcast speech Sunday, saying the accord recognizes Iran's "nuclear rights" even if that precise language was kept from the final document because of Western resistance.

"No matter what interpretations are given, Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized," said Rouhani,...."
US, Iran nuclear deal spurs bipartisan concern in Congress





Iran's right to enrichment has been recognized,


By whom?


Oh.....by Obama.....





Oh...and you need a bit of brushing up on your math.....

"Obama was 5x the man 10 x the president"

You forgot the decimal point in front of the digits.

How has dump prevented Iran from going nuclear?? I missed that Also NK laughed at your orange moron And now he's talking to his last friend in the world the murderer Putin ? Shame on you

1. Why won't any of you Leftist robots answer the question???
Whose domestic achievements would you.....or Obama....have, his or Trumps'?

Sooo.....you've admitted that Trump is a success....Hussein a failure.

Good.


2. "How has [President Trump] prevented Iran from going nuclear??"

From CNN:

"With one signature, President Donald Trump has dealt a major blow to Iran's already struggling economy.
Trump's decision to walk away from the nuclear deal is likely to cost Iran billions in foreign investment, slash growth, deter tourists and deprive its citizens of business opportunities."
US sanctions deal body blow to Iran's economy

"This is a setback on many levels," said Hassan Hakimian, director of the London Middle East Institute at SOAS. "It is bound to be disappointing in terms of the impact on the economic prospects for Iran, and particularly the youth."



3. Remember Pinocchio's lies?


June 5, 2008, in Cairo: "I will continue to be clear on the fact that an Iranian nuclear weapon would be profoundly destabilizing for the entire region.It is strongly in America's interest to prevent such a scenario."


June 8, 2008, to AIPAC: "The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.... Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally Israel."


October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"


November 7, 2008, press conference: "Iran's development of a nuclear weapon, I believe, is unacceptable. And we have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening."


February 27, 2009, speech at Camp Lejeune: "(W)e are focusing on al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan; developing a strategy to use all elements of American power to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon; and actively seeking a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world."


January 27, 2010, State of the Union address: "And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: They, too, will face growing consequences. That is a promise."


July 1, /2010, at the signing of the Iran Sanctions Act: "There should be no doubt -- the United States and the international community are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


May 19, 2011, speech on the Middle East: "Now, our opposition to Iran's intolerance and Iran's repressive measures, as well as its illicit nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known."


May 22, 2011, in an address to AIPAC: "You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.... So let me be absolutely clear -- we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons."


October 13,2011, press conference after meeting with South Korean president:"Now, we don't take any options off the table in terms of how we operate with Iran."


November 14, 2011, press conference: "So what I did was to speak with President Medvedev, as well as President Hu, and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that Iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. That's in the interests of all of us... I have said repeatedly and I will say it today, we are not taking any options off the table, because it's my firm belief that an Iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat not only to the region but also to the United States."


December 8, 2011, press conference: (In response to question about pressuring Iran): "No options off the table means I'm considering all options."


December 16, 2011, speech to the General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism: "Another grave concern -- and a threat to the security of Israel, the United States and the world -- is Iran's nuclear program. And that's why our policy has been absolutely clear: We are determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons...and that's why, rest assured, we will take no options off the table. We have been clear."


January 24, 2012, State of the Union address: "Let there be no doubt: America is determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and I will take no options off the table to achieve that goal."


March 2, 2012, interview with Goldblog: "I... don't, as a matter of sound policy, go around advertising exactly what our intentions are. But I think both the Iranian and the Israeli governments recognize that when the United States says it is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, we mean what we say."


March 4, 2012, speech to AIPAC: "I have said that when it comes to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, I will take no options off the table, and I mean what I say That includes all elements of American power: A political effort aimed at isolating Iran; a diplomatic effort to sustain our coalition and ensure that the Iranian program is monitored; an economic effort that imposes crippling sanctions; and, yes, a military effort to be prepared for any contingency."


March 5, 2012, remarks after meeting with Benjamin Netanyahu: "... I reserve all options, and my policy here is not going to be one of containment. My policy is prevention of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. And as I indicated yesterday in my speech, when I say all options are at the table, I mean it."


March 6, 2012, press conference: "And what I have said is, is that we will not countenance Iran getting a nuclear weapon. My policy is not containment; my policy is to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon -- because if they get a nuclear weapon that could trigger an arms race in the region, it would undermine our non-proliferation goals, it could potentially fall into the hands of terrorists.


March 14, 2012, remarks after meeting with David Cameron: "...And as I said in a speech just a couple of weeks ago, I am determined not simply to contain Iran that is in possession of a nuclear weapon; I am determined to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon -- in part for the reasons that David mentioned... We will do everything we can to resolve this diplomatically, but ultimately, we've got to have somebody on the other side of the table who's taking this seriously."


September 25, 2012, speech to the United Nations General Assembly: "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained...the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon."

Obama's Crystal-Clear Promise to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Weapon - The Atlantic




His hatred of Jews was behind awarding nuclear weapons to the 7th century savages.
You know that, don't you?

Obama hated Jews?? Now you've gone too far Have fun re selling that bridge

You know I'm never wrong, eddie.....


“Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite

• At least seven House Democrats are known to have direct ties to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
• Farrakhan is a notorious anti-Semite and racist
• A photo shows Barack Obama smiling with Farrakhan at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting in 2005

…Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite and racist who has called Jews “satanic” and said white people “deserve to die.”

California Reps. Maxine Waters and Barbara Lee, Illinois Rep. Danny Davis, Indiana Rep. Andre Carson, Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, New York Rep. Gregory Meeks and Texas Rep. Al Green have all attended meetings with Farrakhan while in Congress, according to photos, videos and witness accounts of the meetings reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Ellison, the deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), repeatedly attended meetings with Farrakhan while in Congress, according to photos and videos reviewed by TheDCNF and Farrakhan’s own statements.

Seven House Democrats Have Direct Ties To Notorious Anti-Semite [VIDEO]

If one is a Democrat and claims to subscribe to Judaism......something is wrong.


What sort of self-respect can a Jewish person have if they vote Democrat???

Last time I was wrong was back in 2000 when I voted for GWB And forgive me for not caring much for Israeli murderers

 

[edward37]

You really have to feel sorry for the rabid Trump haters always yelling about the North Korea denuclearization. You can tell that they have never been in any negotiations or even read about them. It took how many years of talks for salt to finally be signed? How many years was the Iran deal, which should be called a joke, being negotiated? They all seem to think that one meeting and everything is signed, sealed, delivered.
They never mention the fact that their Messiah 44 never really did anything about North Korea. That Clinton actually helped by giving nuclear reactors for just a promise of denuclearization all while North Korea admitted to our ambassador that they were continuing to work toward nuclear weapons.

NK and Iran laugh at the moron in our WH and the rest of the world hates his butt too all but his pal Putin