Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But you are simply making shit up about what Trump said.All comes to the purpose of this thread
Does one contrary statement negate everything else you said before that ?
And you find it believable that Trump wanted the Mob to March peacefully on the Capitol?But you are simply making shit up about what Trump said.
Your hero juror explicitly said "I don’t like his persona,” “He just seems very selfish and self-serving " “It’s just not my cup of tea.” And you find it believable when she says she can be fair and unbiased.
I have some wonderful swampland in Arizona., I can give you an excellent price. You interested?
Absolutely. No question. Only those with the most severe cases of TDS would imply that he intend the crowd to riot and storm the capitol. That riot fucked up his entire legal plan to throw the certifications back to the states.And you find it believable that Trump wanted the Mob to March peacefully on the Capitol?
It looks like he NYC Jury will be fair and impartial in judging Trump
I don’t like his persona,” she said. “I don’t like some of my coworkers, but I don’t try to sabotage their work.”
“He just seems very selfish and self-serving so I don’t really appreciate that in any public servant, so I don’t know him as a person, so I don’t know how he is in terms of his integrity,” she added. “It’s just not my cup of tea.”
In denying Trump’s challenge, Merchan said it’s not enough that she doesn’t like his persona because she said she was certain she could set that aside to be fair and impartial.
It is what he told them to do and that is a fact you fucking liar.And you find it believable that Trump wanted the Mob to March peacefully on the Capitol?
It looks like he NYC Jury will be fair and impartial in judging Trump
sure you would.....Sure I would. And I despise Trump.
And you're making dumb excuses. Who will you believe? Depends on if you need to make an excuses or not.
Yes.Trump always claimed New Yorkers loved him and would cheer and applaud when they saw him. Now he says they hate him so much till he can't get a fair trial. I don't see how both can be true. Was he lying before, or is he lying now?
For someone to not hold an opinion they'd need to be deaf, dumb, and brain dead.That she is. A jurist saying what she did should not be seated, EVER. In a normal world, this would be obvious. As a possible jurist, she would never be seated at any other trial when saying that about anyone else.
And you just prove again how dumb you are.
Most accused criminals are not likeable guys, that is the way criminals are.For someone to not hold an opinion they'd need to be deaf, dumb, and brain dead.
One does not need to "like" a person to render a fair judgement of the evidence.
I was absolutely certain OJ was guilty.
BUT, were I on the jury I would have voted to acquit BECAUSE the evidence was tainted and once that tainted evidence, tainted by the LAPD's own actions, was removed there was insufficient evidence to convict.
Everyone has bias. The question is can one separate their bias from the facts presented.
Yes, hard to believe for someone who thinks everyone and everything sucks.sure you would.....
The latest sham trial that is mocking our justice system will have a stacked jury just like the OJ jury. Anyone with common sense sees what has been going on for the last 8 years.It looks like he NYC Jury will be fair and impartial in judging Trump
I don’t like his persona,” she said. “I don’t like some of my coworkers, but I don’t try to sabotage their work.”
“He just seems very selfish and self-serving so I don’t really appreciate that in any public servant, so I don’t know him as a person, so I don’t know how he is in terms of his integrity,” she added. “It’s just not my cup of tea.”
In denying Trump’s challenge, Merchan said it’s not enough that she doesn’t like his persona because she said she was certain she could set that aside to be fair and impartial.
Other than Trump is being accused of something, what makes the trial a sham?The latest sham trial that is mocking our justice system will have a stacked jury just like the OJ jury. Anyone with common sense sees what has been going on for the last 8 years.
nope never said that....i said that about congress....see you cant tell the truth there ...so yea, you wouldnt be credible on a jury.......Yes, hard to believe for someone who thinks everyone and everything sucks.
Er, sucks equally, that is.
Nobody outside your cult agrees with that.The latest sham trial that is mocking our justice system will have a stacked jury just like the OJ jury. Anyone with common sense sees what has been going on for the last 8 years.
You don't have to explicitly say it. It can be deduced. Duh. Think, man.nope never said that....i said that about congress....see you cant tell the truth there ...so yea, you wouldnt be credible on a jury.......
yea back at ya....duh...You don't have to explicitly say it. It can be deduced. Duh. Think, man.
Right. Exactly. So I corrected you. Pay attention!yea back at ya....duh...
no i corrected you.....you need to pay attention....Right. Exactly. So I corrected you. Pay attention!
Your usual mindless boilerplate replies designed to pump up your negative reaction score.Nobody outside your cult agrees with that.
Nor could you argue any of it if your life depended on it.
