Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, she's sueing for emotional distress. You all seem to think the state ought to hand her a big fat check because her teacher was mean to her. I think the teacher was over the line, and deserves to lose her job, but the girl doesn't deserve a cash payout.
While I agree that litigation with the goal of monetary remuneration should be severely curtailed in this country, it is unfortunately not the case. So, why should this girl and her family not take advantage of the same system that is freely used by liberals of all stripes to line their pockets and fatten their bank accounts?
Your response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
Again, she's sueing for emotional distress. You all seem to think the state ought to hand her a big fat check because her teacher was mean to her. I think the teacher was over the line, and deserves to lose her job, but the girl doesn't deserve a cash payout.
While I agree that litigation with the goal of monetary remuneration should be severely curtailed in this country, it is unfortunately not the case. So, why should this girl and her family not take advantage of the same system that is freely used by liberals of all stripes to line their pockets and fatten their bank accounts?
Your response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
For the school to allow this, they need to shell out some bucks. But it should come out of the administrators and the teachers pockets, not the districts. They need to hurt personally, so they never allow this to happen again.
Again, your claim it was a joke is utterly stupid, this is where your bias comes shining through, so of course no one should get a dime. Flip it the other way and you'd scream for a good suing.
You think the teacher deserves jail time, but MY bias is showing?
Btw, I never said it was a joke.
That's right you claimed the teacher said it was in "jest" and you felt it important enough to convey that.
Also, I stated why I said jail time, it is a great liberal response.
While I agree that litigation with the goal of monetary remuneration should be severely curtailed in this country, it is unfortunately not the case. So, why should this girl and her family not take advantage of the same system that is freely used by liberals of all stripes to line their pockets and fatten their bank accounts?
Your response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
Good question? But why should litigation be reserved for butt-hurt liberals only? Gravy for the goose...
Again, she's sueing for emotional distress. You all seem to think the state ought to hand her a big fat check because her teacher was mean to her. I think the teacher was over the line, and deserves to lose her job, but the girl doesn't deserve a cash payout.
While I agree that litigation with the goal of monetary remuneration should be severely curtailed in this country, it is unfortunately not the case. So, why should this girl and her family not take advantage of the same system that is freely used by liberals of all stripes to line their pockets and fatten their bank accounts?
Your response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
While I agree that litigation with the goal of monetary remuneration should be severely curtailed in this country, it is unfortunately not the case. So, why should this girl and her family not take advantage of the same system that is freely used by liberals of all stripes to line their pockets and fatten their bank accounts?
Your response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
Everyone seems to be missing the point.. if you remember being a kid, its easy for one thing to be said about a kid before it spreads and leads to getting picked on. So she has a case.
You think the teacher deserves jail time, but MY bias is showing?
Btw, I never said it was a joke.
That's right you claimed the teacher said it was in "jest" and you felt it important enough to convey that.
Also, I stated why I said jail time, it is a great liberal response.
It IS important. This thread is going on the assumption that everything the student claims is 100% true, and everything the teacher claims is 100% false.
What the teacher admits happened should be enough to lose her job, but let's not forget that she has a different account than the girl.
BTW, keep pretending you didn't write that hurt feelings deserves jail time.
"Only joking".Teacher attacks teen wearing Romney T-shirt, compares it to KKK, student says* - NY Daily News
Pawlucys parents met with the teacher, who apologized and explained she was only joking.
Read more: Teacher attacks teen wearing Romney T-shirt, compares it to KKK, student says - NY Daily News
so the girl and her parents are looking for a court paycheck ?
yeah
Your response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
Good question? But why should litigation be reserved for butt-hurt liberals only? Gravy for the goose...
So, are you admitting that if a teacher was mean to a student for wearing an Obama t-shirt, you wouldnt agree they deserve 6 figures from the state for that offense?
anyone have proof the school actually admitted the inccident took place?
....Mom's "15 minutes"!!
"When Pawlucy's parents dropped off complaint forms regarding the incident at the school on Friday, they were greeted with obscenities from students.
"I want [Sam] to come back and stand up for what's right," Kristine Pawlucy said, according to United Press International, "but I'm afraid she'll be physically assaulted."
"Only joking".Teacher attacks teen wearing Romney T-shirt, compares it to KKK, student says* - NY Daily News
Pawlucys parents met with the teacher, who apologized and explained she was only joking.
Read more: Teacher attacks teen wearing Romney T-shirt, compares it to KKK, student says* - NY Daily News
so the girl and her parents are looking for a court paycheck ?
yeah
Yeah, THAT'S credible -- to morons.
You think the teacher deserves jail time, but MY bias is showing?
Btw, I never said it was a joke.
That's right you claimed the teacher said it was in "jest" and you felt it important enough to convey that.
Also, I stated why I said jail time, it is a great liberal response.
It IS important. This thread is going on the assumption that everything the student claims is 100% true, and everything the teacher claims is 100% false.
What the teacher admits happened should be enough to lose her job, but let's not forget that she has a different account than the girl.
BTW, keep pretending you didn't write that hurt feelings deserves jail time.
No, it's really not "warranted". What happened to her isn't worth a 6 figure check from the state.
That is your opinion, it may not be the opinion of a jury, falsely claiming someone is a racist or a member of a disgusting group may seem okay for you but we have seen people lose their livelihoods over less and many of those made over 6 figure incomes.
That is my opinion. The teacher said it was said in jest, the kid did not lose a 6 figure income, it's not slander. The teacher was over the line, the kid deserves an apology and the teacher deserves to be fired. However she and her family are attempting to cash in on the incident.
Again, she's sueing for emotional distress. You all seem to think the state ought to hand her a big fat check because her teacher was mean to her. I think the teacher was over the line, and deserves to lose her job, but the girl doesn't deserve a cash payout.
That's right you claimed the teacher said it was in "jest" and you felt it important enough to convey that.
Also, I stated why I said jail time, it is a great liberal response.
It IS important. This thread is going on the assumption that everything the student claims is 100% true, and everything the teacher claims is 100% false.
What the teacher admits happened should be enough to lose her job, but let's not forget that she has a different account than the girl.
BTW, keep pretending you didn't write that hurt feelings deserves jail time.
Lol, that is funny, I said slander, not hurt feelings and I have never in my life seen or heard of slander getting jail time in this country, but like I said, you proved your bias in accepting what the teacher was to have said in jest and not accepting mine. You are to easy.
That is your opinion, it may not be the opinion of a jury, falsely claiming someone is a racist or a member of a disgusting group may seem okay for you but we have seen people lose their livelihoods over less and many of those made over 6 figure incomes.
That is my opinion. The teacher said it was said in jest, the kid did not lose a 6 figure income, it's not slander. The teacher was over the line, the kid deserves an apology and the teacher deserves to be fired. However she and her family are attempting to cash in on the incident.
Good for them Teacher should pay up and then think twice about being such a fuck up.
That is my opinion. The teacher said it was said in jest, the kid did not lose a 6 figure income, it's not slander. The teacher was over the line, the kid deserves an apology and the teacher deserves to be fired. However she and her family are attempting to cash in on the incident.
Good for them Teacher should pay up and then think twice about being such a fuck up.
Except they aren't suing the teacher, she doesnt have deep pockets! They're suing the school district.
I understand, but then again.. Youre talking about a catholic school known for disciplining students and I am willing to say its safe to assume it was private as well. This is a public school. Theyre not known for that, well not anymore anyway, I remember when they stilk oaddled..not Long ago, during the 80's. I actuslly ran from the principal when he was going to paddle me and got into serious trouble when they called my mother and she found me at home! LolYour response is "people shouldn't be able to sue for every little thing, but since they can why shouldn't everyone sue for every little thing"?
Everyone seems to be missing the point.. if you remember being a kid, its easy for one thing to be said about a kid before it spreads and leads to getting picked on. So she has a case.
I remember being a kid. I had one teacher who hated my guts. The meanest nun I ever met. Made me stand up in front of the class and tore into me in front of everyone for having to leave early that day. I told my mom, after I left the class in tears, and my mom marched back into the school and bitched out that teaher in front of the class.
It never even occurred to me to sue for "emotional distress".
Not at all. But you swallowed it whole, didn't you?"Only joking".Teacher attacks teen wearing Romney T-shirt, compares it to KKK, student says* - NY Daily News
Pawlucys parents met with the teacher, who apologized and explained she was only joking.
Read more: Teacher attacks teen wearing Romney T-shirt, compares it to KKK, student says* - NY Daily News
so the girl and her parents are looking for a court paycheck ?
yeah
Yeah, THAT'S credible -- to morons.
So, it's credible to you?
It IS important. This thread is going on the assumption that everything the student claims is 100% true, and everything the teacher claims is 100% false.
What the teacher admits happened should be enough to lose her job, but let's not forget that she has a different account than the girl.
BTW, keep pretending you didn't write that hurt feelings deserves jail time.
Lol, that is funny, I said slander, not hurt feelings and I have never in my life seen or heard of slander getting jail time in this country, but like I said, you proved your bias in accepting what the teacher was to have said in jest and not accepting mine. You are to easy.
Except she's not suing for slander, she's suing for hurt feelings.
