Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is what the salary was for that position. Now what does that have to do with the evidence that indicted trump and 19 other people? This is not about election bias against trump. This is about trump trying to interfere in an election to change the results.The question is not whether or not Trump is guilty, but if there is money being used to bribe people into selective and illegal prosecution intended to bias an election.
The payment of $650,000 is 10 times too high not to be a bribe.
You've got it wrong, Kunta!That is what the salary was for that position. Now what does that have to do with the evidence that indicted trump and 19 other people? This is not about election bias against trump. This is about trump trying to interfere in an election to change the results.
There is no immunity from trying to intimidate state officials into changing election results.Actually the charges are less than a year old, not 3 1/2 years.
Candidacy IS supposed to effectively give diplomatic immunity.
The voters are supposed to decide for themselves.
When you have 91 charges all at once, some from activities 30 years ago, it clearly is "piling on" and it deliberate election abuse.
Brainwashed functional moron ignoramus seditionist Russian tool pos conspiracy nut job etç lol......Dude you should stop projecting
Says the trump Russian collusion conspriscy theorist nut bagBrainwashed functional moron ignoramus seditionist Russian tool pos conspiracy nut job etç lol......
If the Biden campaign had 140 plus meetings with Russia, I'm sure you'd be telling us how he's a Russian asset.Says the trump Russian collusion conspriscy theorist nut bag
Stupid all new aminastrations before they take control meet with Russia and other countriesIf the Biden campaign had 140 plus meetings with Russia, I'm sure you'd be telling us how he's a Russian asset.
Makes no difference before or after.
The obvious fact is $650,000 for one case is about 10 times too high.
Obvious corruption.
It is not the relationship that is illegal, but a relationship makes it suspicious.
And it does not matter if they were already close or the money made them close.
In fact, if the relationship started after the contract, that is likely worse, as a quid pro quo.
The Clintons obviously were guilty with Whitewater.
Whitewater was deliberately made to go bankrupts through ridiculous land deals, so that they could double dip and get the land and get bailed out by the fed.
It was just not possible to prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt.
Except none of the indictments are for behavior 30 years ago.Actually the charges are less than a year old, not 3 1/2 years.
Candidacy IS supposed to effectively give diplomatic immunity.
The voters are supposed to decide for themselves.
When you have 91 charges all at once, some from activities 30 years ago, it clearly is "piling on" and it deliberate election abuse.
You've got it wrong, Kunta!
They’re always hiringare they hiring?.....~S~
That would explain much, like his poor understanding of English Grammar.Does anyone here not yet realize that Rigby is on the Kremlin payroll?
спасибо, товарищThey’re always hiring
By now, even the lefty The Atlantic called for her to step down.Could a tattoo, inscribed at Belize, decide whether the district attorney of Georgia’s Fulton County, Fani Willis, and her special prosecutor and boyfriend, Nathan Wade, should be disqualified from the sprawling racketeering case that they have brought against President Trump and 18 others?
The possibility that a tale told in ink and skin could shape one of the most anticipated prosecutions in American history became legible after Judge Scott McAfee rebuffed the request by Ms. Willis and Mr. Wade to cancel an evidentiary hearing set for Thursday. The two prosecutors have confessed to a “personal relationship,” but deny that it predates Mr. Wade’s hiring.
The lawyer leading the push to disqualify the amorous pair, Ashleigh Merchant, represents one of Mr. Trump’s co-defendants, Michael Roman. She claims that the romance predates Ms. Willis picking Mr. Wade — Ms. Merchant claims he is unqualified — and that the two were motivated by joint pecuniary interest. Judge McAfee allows that it is “possible that the facts alleged by the defendant could result in disqualification.”
My understanding is the tattoo was created in 2021 when both Fani and her boyfriend went to Belize and got a $70 tattoo but they denied they were in a relationship But witnesses say they started going on romantic trips long before 2022. Fani has lied and the judge wants to see the tattoo and get some information from the tattoo artist.
Really? Link to thatBy now, even the lefty The Atlantic called for her to step down.
Really? Link to that
By the way… was the tattoo mentioned in Court?
www.theatlantic.com
You seem to be tapdancing around that Letitia James alleged "fraud" thing.Except that $650,000 is not excessive for a multi-year contract that was approved by the County Board.
Sorry, grown adults are allowed to date coworkers.
Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars trying to prove the Clintons were guilty of something, anything and came up empty. The Clintons LOST money on their Whitewater investment, just like everyone else did.
Except none of the indictments are for behavior 30 years ago.
The Documents case is for behavior in 2021 and 2022.
The J6 Cases are for behavior in 2020 and 2021
The Stormy Daniels case is for conduct in 2016.
That isn't one of the 91 FELONY indictments.You seem to be tapdancing around that Letitia James alleged "fraud" thing.
Now did it just slip you mind that it was 30 years ago, or are you being intentionally obtuse to beguile, or are you just that fucking ignorant?
Gee. How did the court miss that?That isn't one of the 91 FELONY indictments.
In fact the reason why Trump wasn't charged criminally was because the fraud started so long ago.
