Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Chinese have already voted against N Korea and have announced that they will not interfere if the N Koreans are the ones who violate another country's sovernty, which N. Korea is doing all the time with Japan and the South.Youre not only stupid youre dangerously naive if you think the Chinese are going to let anyone invade N.Korea. Good thing no one is stupid enough to let you be a decision maker.Don't be stupid. The US will not be invading N. Korea if there is a war. You don't know what the Chinese will or won't do.They will go to war with the US if they attempt to invade or attack N.Korea. We know because the US continues to talk big but do nothing. Everyone with a 3rd grade education understands the consequences of the US invading N.Korea with China next door.He is a much bigger threat to Japan, S Korea and other countries that are doing big business with China. The UN has voted unanimously, including China, against the N. Korean regime. So no, China will not go to war with with the world over N. Korea. Push comes to shove they will throw him under the bus.Actually it is about the US only dumbass. China doesnt have to go to war with the entire world. No one is going to back the US if they invade N.Korea. The Chinese will not allow the US to occupy or attack N.Korea.This isn't about the US only dumbass. China will not go to war with the entire world both economically and militarily for an out of control, spoiled brat fat punk.
Why do assume that the US will be using nukes?No we cannot. The Chinese will not go against the entire world body. Their two concerns are a US occupation once the regime is destroyed, and N Korean refugees that may pour into China. The US can reach an agreement with China that they will not occupy as long as China does not interfere.I think we can safely say they will pour hundreds of thousands of troops into North Korea, if anyone attempts to occupy it. Just like last time.Don't be stupid. The US will not be invading N. Korea if there is a war. You don't know what the Chinese will or won't do.They will go to war with the US if they attempt to invade or attack N.Korea. We know because the US continues to talk big but do nothing. Everyone with a 3rd grade education understands the consequences of the US invading N.Korea with China next door.He is a much bigger threat to Japan, S Korea and other countries that are doing big business with China. The UN has voted unanimously, including China, against the N. Korean regime. So no, China will not go to war with with the world over N. Korea. Push comes to shove they will throw him under the bus.
How will Japan feel about being downwind of the nuclear fallout?
Meanwhile we remain in Syria. And I do not accept hopes when a madman has nukes; all the time and money spent on Saddam could have been spent to impair THIS regime.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
There's also a possibility that one of these rockets goes wrong and it actually hits Japan or S. Korea. At that point the shit will surely hit the fan.
All he's really proved is that he can hit the Pacific Ocean, not anything in particular. The Chinese had misfiring rockets for years after they had nukes because their guidance gyros didn't work. Then along came Scum Willy and let Loral give them what they needed for campaign funds. And he's still walking around today a free man. Can Dung Un hit Guam? Would his warhead survive reentry into the atmosphere? And there's always the possibility a rocket with a nuke could explode on launch and he'd nuke himself.
"Their two concerns are a US occupation once the regime is destroyed"No we cannot. The Chinese will not go against the entire world body. Their two concerns are a US occupation once the regime is destroyed, and N Korean refugees that may pour into China. The US can reach an agreement with China that they will not occupy as long as China does not interfere.I think we can safely say they will pour hundreds of thousands of troops into North Korea, if anyone attempts to occupy it. Just like last time.Don't be stupid. The US will not be invading N. Korea if there is a war. You don't know what the Chinese will or won't do.They will go to war with the US if they attempt to invade or attack N.Korea. We know because the US continues to talk big but do nothing. Everyone with a 3rd grade education understands the consequences of the US invading N.Korea with China next door.He is a much bigger threat to Japan, S Korea and other countries that are doing big business with China. The UN has voted unanimously, including China, against the N. Korean regime. So no, China will not go to war with with the world over N. Korea. Push comes to shove they will throw him under the bus.Actually it is about the US only dumbass. China doesnt have to go to war with the entire world. No one is going to back the US if they invade N.Korea. The Chinese will not allow the US to occupy or attack N.Korea.
Why do assume that the US will be using nukes?No we cannot. The Chinese will not go against the entire world body. Their two concerns are a US occupation once the regime is destroyed, and N Korean refugees that may pour into China. The US can reach an agreement with China that they will not occupy as long as China does not interfere.I think we can safely say they will pour hundreds of thousands of troops into North Korea, if anyone attempts to occupy it. Just like last time.Don't be stupid. The US will not be invading N. Korea if there is a war. You don't know what the Chinese will or won't do.They will go to war with the US if they attempt to invade or attack N.Korea. We know because the US continues to talk big but do nothing. Everyone with a 3rd grade education understands the consequences of the US invading N.Korea with China next door.
How will Japan feel about being downwind of the nuclear fallout?
Talking to you is like talking to a retarded chimp. You cant be dumb enough to honestly believe China is going to let anyone invade N. Korea.The Chinese have already voted against N Korea and have announced that they will not interfere if the N Koreans are the ones who violate another country's sovernty, which N. Korea is doing all the time with Japan and the South.Youre not only stupid youre dangerously naive if you think the Chinese are going to let anyone invade N.Korea. Good thing no one is stupid enough to let you be a decision maker.Don't be stupid. The US will not be invading N. Korea if there is a war. You don't know what the Chinese will or won't do.They will go to war with the US if they attempt to invade or attack N.Korea. We know because the US continues to talk big but do nothing. Everyone with a 3rd grade education understands the consequences of the US invading N.Korea with China next door.He is a much bigger threat to Japan, S Korea and other countries that are doing big business with China. The UN has voted unanimously, including China, against the N. Korean regime. So no, China will not go to war with with the world over N. Korea. Push comes to shove they will throw him under the bus.Actually it is about the US only dumbass. China doesnt have to go to war with the entire world. No one is going to back the US if they invade N.Korea. The Chinese will not allow the US to occupy or attack N.Korea.
Meanwhile we remain in Syria. And I do not accept hopes when a madman has nukes; all the time and money spent on Saddam could have been spent to impair THIS regime.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
What did that have to do with point Peach was making?Meanwhile we remain in Syria. And I do not accept hopes when a madman has nukes; all the time and money spent on Saddam could have been spent to impair THIS regime.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
Meanwhile we remain in Syria. And I do not accept hopes when a madman has nukes; all the time and money spent on Saddam could have been spent to impair THIS regime.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
There's also a possibility that one of these rockets goes wrong and it actually hits Japan or S. Korea. At that point the shit will surely hit the fan.
All he's really proved is that he can hit the Pacific Ocean, not anything in particular. The Chinese had misfiring rockets for years after they had nukes because their guidance gyros didn't work. Then along came Scum Willy and let Loral give them what they needed for campaign funds. And he's still walking around today a free man. Can Dung Un hit Guam? Would his warhead survive reentry into the atmosphere? And there's always the possibility a rocket with a nuke could explode on launch and he'd nuke himself.
Meanwhile we remain in Syria. And I do not accept hopes when a madman has nukes; all the time and money spent on Saddam could have been spent to impair THIS regime.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
As are US military personnel, those of other countries, and support personnel. They are the ones I mourn.
Meanwhile we remain in Syria. And I do not accept hopes when a madman has nukes; all the time and money spent on Saddam could have been spent to impair THIS regime.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
As are US military personnel, those of other countries, and support personnel. They are the ones I mourn.
I'm sorry. You are trying hard but not making sense trying to connect two completely unrelated topics.
How is that?
We haven't done shit in Syria compared to what we could have done.
I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
As are US military personnel, those of other countries, and support personnel. They are the ones I mourn.
I'm sorry. You are trying hard but not making sense trying to connect two completely unrelated topics.
We spent over a trillion on the Iraq disaster and Iraq had no WMDs and no hopes of developing any in the near future; North Korea has had, and used the wasted time on Iraq to keep on producing nukes.
Hindsight is never 20-20, events skew the visual. Espionage to inflitrate the circle, bribe enough to kill Dear Leader, he is not popular nor was DL 1.I referenced Saddam and the Iraq disaster.
Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
As are US military personnel, those of other countries, and support personnel. They are the ones I mourn.
I'm sorry. You are trying hard but not making sense trying to connect two completely unrelated topics.
We spent over a trillion on the Iraq disaster and Iraq had no WMDs and no hopes of developing any in the near future; North Korea has had, and used the wasted time on Iraq to keep on producing nukes.
Hyperbole is all you have? A trillion? I suggest a good education on the topic.
Short of invading NK, what should we have better used that money for?
Come on, you are a Monday morning quarterback with 20/20 hindsight! Give it your best shot!
Trump is not a raging alcoholic like Kim and Clinton.A man with nukes who threatens to use them.
It is not looking good.
Meh, I'm more worried about Trump having nukes than the little potbellied dictator...
I don't think that's how the Japanese view it everytime the punk violates their airspace and shoots another one over their heads. We either allow them to arm themselves and take care of themselves, or we have to do it for them, as our agreement says. Considering their history, it's better not to allow Japan to have an offensive military.There's also a possibility that one of these rockets goes wrong and it actually hits Japan or S. Korea. At that point the shit will surely hit the fan.
All he's really proved is that he can hit the Pacific Ocean, not anything in particular. The Chinese had misfiring rockets for years after they had nukes because their guidance gyros didn't work. Then along came Scum Willy and let Loral give them what they needed for campaign funds. And he's still walking around today a free man. Can Dung Un hit Guam? Would his warhead survive reentry into the atmosphere? And there's always the possibility a rocket with a nuke could explode on launch and he'd nuke himself.
Unless that rocket is loaded with a nuclear warhead, it will be the equivalent of nothing more than a small plane crash.
Hindsight is never 20-20, events skew the visual. Espionage to inflitrate the circle, bribe enough to kill Dear Leader, he is not popular nor was DL 1.Saddam was a LONG time ago! He's been dead well over a decade!
As are US military personnel, those of other countries, and support personnel. They are the ones I mourn.
I'm sorry. You are trying hard but not making sense trying to connect two completely unrelated topics.
We spent over a trillion on the Iraq disaster and Iraq had no WMDs and no hopes of developing any in the near future; North Korea has had, and used the wasted time on Iraq to keep on producing nukes.
Hyperbole is all you have? A trillion? I suggest a good education on the topic.
Short of invading NK, what should we have better used that money for?
Come on, you are a Monday morning quarterback with 20/20 hindsight! Give it your best shot!
Depends what the meaning of is, is.Trump is not a raging alcoholic like Kim and Clinton.A man with nukes who threatens to use them.
It is not looking good.
Meh, I'm more worried about Trump having nukes than the little potbellied dictator...
Hindsight is never 20-20, events skew the visual. Espionage to inflitrate the circle, bribe enough to kill Dear Leader, he is not popular nor was DL 1.As are US military personnel, those of other countries, and support personnel. They are the ones I mourn.
I'm sorry. You are trying hard but not making sense trying to connect two completely unrelated topics.
We spent over a trillion on the Iraq disaster and Iraq had no WMDs and no hopes of developing any in the near future; North Korea has had, and used the wasted time on Iraq to keep on producing nukes.
Hyperbole is all you have? A trillion? I suggest a good education on the topic.
Short of invading NK, what should we have better used that money for?
Come on, you are a Monday morning quarterback with 20/20 hindsight! Give it your best shot!
Infiltrate? ROFLMAO!
The people around Kim has probably been there since his birth. Those of you who speak in such terms have obviously never thought it through or you would not make such ridiculous statements.
