BenNatuf
Limit Authority
meaning that obcenity is not speech. The decission was not whether a type of "free speech" was protected, it was whether obscenity was free speech at all.The SCOTUS was ruling in a case wherein they needed to determine if a particular example of "free speech" was pornography. They ruled that they could tell the difference when they saw it but they could not define it.
I know exactly what I'm talking about... it is after all me talking. And You've made your position clear for anybody who can read to know.And you aren't correcting me, you have no idea what you are talking about, and no idea what my "position" is.
restating this tripe over and over again will not make it any more true than it was the first time you spouted it.Like I said speech can take the form of insurrection, conspiracy, pornography, child abuse, slander, criminal acts, incitement to riot etc.
there are very few, but we've already covered thatAll of which are prohibited, there are MANY exceptions to free speech.
why would I want to ask that terroist aiding and abetting peice of shit anything? He's no different than tokyo rose. Nothing more than an agent handler of espionage in the spirit of the soviet spymasters. The only thing I can't figure out is why he ain't deadJust ask Julian Assange.