Federal Agents search Jeffrey Clark's home


The heat is being turned up....
If Stasi were the name of a pasta instead of an oppressive regime in East Germany circa 1950, then "turn up the heat" might apply here.

As it stands, this is state sanctioned intimidation.
 
My bet is both Clark and Eastman are indicted....trump....not sure about him...although he incited the entire insurrection effort.
people from all over the country claimed to have witnessed election fraud ... whether there was fraud or not Trump wasnt the only person saying there was massive amounts of fraud during the election .

 
How many "nothing burgers" are you willing to kneel and shove down your throat for the fat slug?
Most of the repubs have had the a*ses turned up in the air for trump for years. And he has taken full advantage of their position.
 
If Stasi were the name of a pasta instead of an oppressive regime in East Germany circa 1950, then "turn up the heat" might apply here.

As it stands, this is state sanctioned intimidation.


1656016378170.png





Well.......we tried.
 
I don't think we tried hard enough. If we keep putting party over country, we will continue getting people like John Cornyn and Liz Cheney.


I live in the People's Republic of New York.
People can't go out, the subway is too dangerous even for cops.....

But the polls say the Democrats will be reelected.

We're just circling the drain.
 
It is over for trump. Clark may have pleaded the 5th over 100 times with the J6 committee...but it won't do him any good now.

This search would not have happened if a judge had not signed off on probable cause of a crime.

trump will throw Eastman and Clark under the bus. That is what Mafia Bosses for.

They why haven't the DOJ indicted him?

Meanwhile the Joke 6 Committee has NO Cross Examinations of witnesses allowed because the committee is stacked on one side.
 
I live in the People's Republic of New York.
People can't go out, the subway is too dangerous even for cops.....

But the polls say the Democrats will be reelected.

We're just circling the drain.

It is called being sheep's who have been trained to be followers of government.
 
Are you watching the hearing? trump is a sleazy man. He wanted Clark to do what he wanted Zylenky in Ukraine to do. He wanted him to send a letter to Georgia stating that they needed to investigate fraud.

trump wanted to place doubt in the public's mind. Just like he tried to get an investigation announced in Hunter Biden.

These are Mafia tactics....
 
I live in the People's Republic of New York.
People can't go out, the subway is too dangerous even for cops.....

But the polls say the Democrats will be reelected.

We're just circling the drain.
The subways are gonna be a lot more dangerous with lots more guns after the USSC decisions.
 
Are you watching the hearing? trump is a sleazy man. He wanted Clark to do what he wanted Zylenky in Ukraine to do. He wanted him to send a letter to Georgia stating that they needed to investigate fraud.

trump wanted to place doubt in the public's mind. Just like he tried to get an investigation announced in Hunter Biden.

These are Mafia tactics....

You forget that this Stalinist Commission DOES NOT ALLOW REBUTTAL OR REFUTATION!

You must either be a fascist, Stalinist, or Nazi!!
As you are not an American.
True Americans support fair play.

I hope you choke yourself into a coma on a Hot Dog on July 4th!
 
Are you watching the hearing? trump is a sleazy man. He wanted Clark to do what he wanted Zylenky in Ukraine to do. He wanted him to send a letter to Georgia stating that they needed to investigate fraud.

trump wanted to place doubt in the public's mind. Just like he tried to get an investigation announced in Hunter Biden.

These are Mafia tactics....
Why do you suppose the ‘Jan6 Committee’ wouldn’t allow any pro-Trump members to sit in?

Doesn’t that mean that everything they are claiming is easily refuted???

Could there be any other reason?




Dershowitz to Newsmax: 'Never Believe Anyone Who Is Not Cross-Examined

Retired constitutional law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax on Tuesday that to be credible, witnesses must always be cross-examined, and that none of the Jan. 6 committee hearing witnesses has been.
''As a professor of criminal law for many years, and as one of the most experienced litigators, never believe anyone who is not cross-examined,'' Dershowitz said on ''The Chris Salcedo Show.''
''And none of these [Jan. 6 committee] witnesses are cross-examined.''





Stop being a Nazi.....be an American.
 
Can't wait to see the list of Trump's congressional goons who requested pardons over "the stolen election!


You don't know the election was stolen???

Wanna see me prove it????



Just because a series of corrupt courts.....including the 'supreme' one.....wouldn't hear the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't clear and dispositive evidence.



I can provide it.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.

The Constitution as Supreme Law

http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.



Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”


McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law
 

Forum List

Back
Top