Federal Judge says arguments against Gay Marriage are bull

[Seawytch]

Federal judge: Arguments against gay marriage 'are not those of serious people' - The Week

In his ruling, District Judge John G. Heyburn II shredded the state's argument that a gay marriage ban was necessary from a biological standpoint because "traditional marriages contribute to a stable birth rate which, in turn, ensures the state's long-term economic stability." Heyburn pulled no punches in labeling that claim "disingenuous."

These arguments are not those of serious people. Though it seems almost unnecessary to explain, here are the reasons why. Even assuming the state has a legitimate interest in promoting procreation, the Court fails to see, and Defendant never explains, how the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage has any effect whatsoever on procreation among heterosexual spouses. Excluding same-sex couples from marriage does not change the number of heterosexual couples who choose to get married, the number who choose to have children, or the number of children they have. […] The state's attempts to connect the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage to its interest in economic stability and in "ensuring humanity's continued existence" are at best illogical and even bewildering.

It's very simple.

If heterosexual married people aren't allowed to file joint income tax forms and collect Social Security survivor benefits...


...they will stop fucking. The human race will die out.



If gay married people are allowed to file joint income tax forms and collect Social Security survivor benefits...


...you will feel a sudden urge to have butt sex with other men.


You see, government gifts cause sex to happen. If the government gives gifts for being straight, you have straight sex. If the government gives gifts for being gay, you have gay sex.

It's all in the manual.

Close to 50% of the population live in states with marriage equality now...is it working? Are we turning ya'll?

 

[Seawytch]

The war for benefits...that's all it is.

Actually it's for Equality Before The Law, an American Value, but you wouldn't know what that is so instead you believe nonsense.

Equal benefits...you can't argue equal outcomes...no matter how hard you imagine.

Equal access. If you took away all the cash and prizes but left civil marriage in place, we'd still want equal access to it...after all, we've been marrying in churches for decades without the goodies.