The Rush To Try Trump Before The Election

[Billiejeens]

You need to read up on it. Go fetch your own.

So no way.
Okay.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Lost what?

How so?

You appear to be the only whining, comical bitch here today Skippy.

.. why bother .. you’re hopeless, clueless and lost in the wasteland, enjoy.

 

[MagicMike]

.. why bother .. you’re hopeless, clueless and lost in the wasteland, enjoy.

In other words you just pulled those statements outta your ass right?

 

[Lumpy 1]

In other words you just pulled those statements outta your ass right?

I posted my opinion.. you’re the one being a desperate and emotional ass.

 

[BluesLegend]

I don't think that's actually true.

I read the opinion of two of the SCOTUS justices that made precisely this point. They went out of their way to do so.

 

[IM2]

Each of us would have been put in prison 2 years ago. Trump claims he's being done wrong but wants to string out the cases until after the election. I don't know about you guys, but if I was being done wrong by all this "lawfare", I'd want to take that to court as quickly as possible in order to prove it.

 

[Rogue AI]

In what way?

Liberals don't like it. No logic, no thought is necessary for them to scream UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Which is odd, as it is the Supreme Court that determines Constitutionality in the first place. I guess they really can't see how stupid they look.

 

[IM2]

Biden has raised over $30 million since the debate.

 

[IM2]

Liberals don't like it. No logic, no thought is necessary for them to scream UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! Which is odd, as it is the Supreme Court that determines Constitutionality in the first place. I guess they really can't see how stupid they look.

Given thatthe constitution created checks on the president and this removes them, yes, it is unconstitutional.

 

[Rogue AI]

Given thatthe constitution created checks on the president and this removes them, yes, it is unconstitutional.

The check in the Constitution is High Crimes and Misdemeanors in terms of conduct. That would mean only impeachment and removal could be used. This was a half baked compromise and you folks still whine. Pathetic.

 

[Care4all]

In what way?

In every way. The constitution does not give presidential immunity presumption, to a President. The constitution does not support the Supreme court decision.

 

[IM2]

The check in the Constitution is High Crimes and Misdemeanors in terms of conduct. That would mean only impeachment and removal could be used. This was a half baked compromise and you folks still whine. Pathetic.

Trump broke the law. No one is immune from the law.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Trump broke the law. No one is immune from the law.

Trump is .. Biden is .. Obama was, lucky for him.. !

 

[Mac1958]

Because the people deserve to know if they’re electing a criminal or not.

I'm not exactly sure the people care at this point.

If they really did, we wouldn't be on the precipice of an American Pinochet right now. We wouldn't be anywhere NEAR it.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I'm not exactly sure the people care at this point.

If they really did, we wouldn't be on the precipice of an American Pinochet right now. We wouldn't be anywhere NEAR it.

Oh .. turn that frown upside down .. Mac ..

Four more years of Trump melodrama with fictional horrors , you’ll love it, a dream come true..

Pinochet ..

 

[Lumpy 1]

In every way. The constitution does not give presidential immunity presumption, to a President. The constitution does not support the Supreme court decision.

Mmm ..

 

[Mac1958]

The whole presidential immunity, changes my mind on the upcoming sentencing. Yes, he needs jail time.

Well, let's look at the bright side.

If he wins in November, we'll find out how many felons can fit in the White House!

 

[Meathead]

July 11th. The day trump gets sentenced. Big day is not far away. trump and his lawyers want the case gone. The 34 felonies a jury of his peers nailed him on. So the crooked shit show guy you call dear leader is shitting his pants and it doesn't look good.

Give it up. It didn't work.

 

[kyzr]

Each of us would have been put in prison 2 years ago. Trump claims he's being done wrong but wants to string out the cases until after the election. I don't know about you guys, but if I was being done wrong by all this "lawfare", I'd want to take that to court as quickly as possible in order to prove it.

Actually Trump needs time for the appeals to work thru to overturn those 34 felonies.
The other cases just hit a wall because of immunity.

 

[sparky]

I don't know about you guys, but if I was being done wrong by all this "lawfare", I'd want to take that to court as quickly as possible in order to prove it.

Via partisan DOJ IM2?

~S~