Fizz
Rookie
- Nov 20, 2009
- 4,391
- 346
- 0
- Banned
- #2,581
its not logical. it is paranoid. there are no pictures of a concrete core BECAUSE THERE WAS NO CONCRETE CORE. nobody stole all the pictures that ever existed. that would be an impossible task to begin with. yo uare paranoid and delusional.If I say the perpetrators took the images of the concrete at construction before 9-11, that is reasonable, because I allege they new they were going to conduct this deception. This is logical in order to evade/obstruct justice and detection.
so your claim is that even though the building collapsed the core should be standing? you think the core was designed to stand even though a building was collapsing all around it and crushing it not only from the top but from the sides as it collapsed? its completely illogical.If I say that the towers you say exist must have had a very strong core and withstood 3, 110 mph winds, then historically it shows to be very strong.
If it was very strong and in the center of the building, it would be standing after the outside of the building fell.
you've been shown the pictures many, many times. your apparent mental illness is causing you to deny what your eyes are seeing.No image from 9-11 show the supposed steel core columns.
or maybe you are hypnotized by the blinking and breathing man to not see them.
anyway, everybody else can see them. the entire world. your wacko denials arent going to convince anyone that steel core they see with their own eyes is concrete. so do you think you are right or the 6 billion other people in the world?
so why do you continue to say Robertson said it when you are admitting here that it is the publisher saying it? Robertson has NEVER said the core was concrete. not once. prove he did. you got nothing. give it up.The publisher of a magazine, or anyone one writing something is obviously the one making the statement. You've said nothing that is not common knowledge.
newsweek makes mistakes just like everybody else.I say Newsweek is going to be very accurate with their information to the public when it is information vital to documenting fact for the public in a case of 3,000 deaths.
manipulation? who am i manipulating? i am entitled to my opinion and am free to express it. actually i feel it is YOU that is mocking the 3000 americans killed by terrorist by spreading your paranoid, delusional rantings that are in complete contrast to every piece of hard evidence.You have totally failed to address the question and clearly are supporting secret methods of mass murder with you manipulation.
and you are mocking him by posting his picture with your LIES.[/quote]This man is thinking about how many friends he has lost. Men he worked with, counted on and cared for, protected. He felt they were like brothers.
prove it.He was gagged by an administrative order from talking about his experience.
END Police-Firefighter 911 Gag Order: New Yorkers For The Common Good