FEMA Deceives Nation About Twin Towers Core

[Rat in the Hat]

And no one believes him. Or ever will.

 

[Christophera]

Look at how little credibility agents have attempting their nonsense "false social group" psyops.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2756738-post7774.html

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

#1 Attempted debunking will show an overly complex set of pages working to misrepresent photos with various alignments. It's conclusion is completely unsupported by any single image showing what is claimed.

#2 The assertion that the engineer of record provided info that was reported erroneously is not accompanied by a correction of the Globally published magazine. It has no logic presented for this shortcoming when 3,000 people are killed in 20 seconds.

#3 No alternative image of a horizontally complete core of columns is provided and the only such image of the core of a Twin tower is not reasonably explained

#4 Images used in attempts to show steel core columns do not show steel columns clearly in the core area and needed interconnecting braces for a steel core are never seen.

#5 With no diagonal braces and no gusset plates and no reasonable explanation for the one image of a horizontally intact, complete core, and no statement from engineers stating that steel columns 1,350 feet tall may be assembled into one column by connecting with butt plates is provided. Lifting eyes are not on the top of column sections, they are on the side. The top is needed clear so joining can be done.

#6 No image of the diagonal bracing not on the same plane as the interior box columns which surrounded the core is ever seen. Joints between diagonals and beams must have gusset plates. If diagonals seen are not seen on 9-11 they were not apart of the structure.

#7 Anyone without plans from official sources who fails to recognize that the info needed to clarify this issue of the core was stolen from public offices depriving the public of true knowledge of the towers structure, arguing for a structure they cannot show, counter to independently verified evidence, is effectively an agent.

 

[Christophera]

Look at how little credibility agents have attempting their nonsense "false social group" psyops.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2756738-post7774.html

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

#1 Attempted debunking will show an overly complex set of pages working to misrepresent photos with various alignments. It's conclusion is completely unsupported by any single image showing what is claimed.

#2 The assertion that the engineer of record provided info that was reported erroneously is not accompanied by a correction of the Globally published magazine. It has no logic presented for this shortcoming when 3,000 people are killed in 20 seconds.

#3 No alternative image of a horizontally complete core of columns is provided and the only such image of the core of a Twin tower is not reasonably explained

#4 Images used in attempts to show steel core columns do not show steel columns clearly in the core area and needed interconnecting braces for a steel core are never seen.

#5 With no diagonal braces and no gusset plates and no reasonable explanation for the one image of a horizontally intact, complete core, and no statement from engineers stating that steel columns 1,350 feet tall may be assembled into one column by connecting with butt plates is provided. Lifting eyes are not on the top of column sections, they are on the side. The top is needed clear so joining can be done.

#6 No image of the diagonal bracing not on the same plane as the interior box columns which surrounded the core is ever seen. Joints between diagonals and beams must have gusset plates. If diagonals seen are not seen on 9-11 they were not apart of the structure.

#7 Anyone without plans from official sources who fails to recognize that the info needed to clarify this issue of the core was stolen from public offices depriving the public of true knowledge of the towers structure, arguing for a structure they cannot show, counter to independently verified evidence, is effectively an agent.

 

[DiveCon]

more total bullshit from goof-o-phera

 

[stannrodd]

#1.2.3.4.5.6.7.

Have been so debunked that Chris must be shi**ing in his own mind and calling it concrete..

Sadd case

Are you ever going to engage in discussion Chris or are you forever going to preach your imbecile lies..

Sorry I know the answer .. going to keep preaching lies .. right.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Look at how little credibility agents have attempting their nonsense "false social group" psyops.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2756738-post7774.html

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

#1 Attempted debunking will show an overly complex set of pages working to misrepresent photos with various alignments. It's conclusion is completely unsupported by any single image showing what is claimed.

#2 The assertion that the engineer of record provided info that was reported erroneously is not accompanied by a correction of the Globally published magazine. It has no logic presented for this shortcoming when 3,000 people are killed in 20 seconds.

#3 No alternative image of a horizontally complete core of columns is provided and the only such image of the core of a Twin tower is not reasonably explained

#4 Images used in attempts to show steel core columns do not show steel columns clearly in the core area and needed interconnecting braces for a steel core are never seen.

#5 With no diagonal braces and no gusset plates and no reasonable explanation for the one image of a horizontally intact, complete core, and no statement from engineers stating that steel columns 1,350 feet tall may be assembled into one column by connecting with butt plates is provided. Lifting eyes are not on the top of column sections, they are on the side. The top is needed clear so joining can be done.

#6 No image of the diagonal bracing not on the same plane as the interior box columns which surrounded the core is ever seen. Joints between diagonals and beams must have gusset plates. If diagonals seen are not seen on 9-11 they were not apart of the structure.

#7 Anyone without plans from official sources who fails to recognize that the info needed to clarify this issue of the core was stolen from public offices depriving the public of true knowledge of the towers structure, arguing for a structure they cannot show, counter to independently verified evidence, is effectively an agent.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITeuaqcpckc&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

 

[Rat in the Hat]

#1.2.3.4.5.6.7.

Have been so debunked that Chris must be shi**ing in his own mind and calling it concrete..

Sadd case

Are you ever going to engage in discussion Chris or are you forever going to preach your imbecile lies..

Sorry I know the answer .. going to keep preaching lies .. right.

All he has are his lies and delusions.

 

[Christophera]

Only evidence will work. Your false social group is a failure, only exposing itself agent.

 

[DiveCon]

Only evidence will work. Your false social group is a failure, only exposing itself agent.

and your paranoid delusions are NOT, nor will they ever be, evidence

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Only evidence will work.....

Then post some, like the intact concrete core from when the towers were occupied.

It's your theory, so prove it.

 

[Christophera]

Only evidence will work.....

Then post some, like the intact concrete core from when the towers were occupied.

It's your theory, so prove it.

agent rattie, the core was not visible at all when completed. I would have 6,000 photo files of construction with some showing the concrete core during construction IF guliani had not taken them in violation of law.

http://web.archive.org/web/20020224015919/http://www.nyclu.org/g_archive020602.html

If the steel core columns existed then you could post an image of them standing in the core on 9-11. Because the steel core columns did not exist, no agent can post an image of them in the core area on 9-11.

That is why gumjob photoshopped a lobby photo of WTC 2 and shopped in WTC 1 exterior visuals, but the footbridge window frames bleed through the perimeter columns of the tower.

agent busted faking evidence.

The proof is in Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992. identifying the concrete core the proof is in images from 9-11 showing the concrete core.

 

[elvis]

Only evidence will work.....

Then post some, like the intact concrete core from when the towers were occupied.

It's your theory, so prove it.

agent rattie, the core was not visible at all when completed. I would have 6,000 photo files of construction with some showing the concrete core during construction IF guliani had not taken them in violation of law.



If the steel core columns existed then you could post an image of them standing in the core on 9-11. Because the steel core columns did not exist, no agent can post an image of them in the core area on 9-11.

That is why gumjob photoshopped a lobby photo of WTC 2 and shopped in WTC 1 exterior visuals, but the footbridge window frames bleed through the perimeter columns of the tower.



agent busted faking evidence.

The proof is in Oxford encyclopedia of Technology and Innovation, published in 1992. identifying the concrete core the proof is in images from 9-11 showing the concrete core.

speaking of rattle, why don't you suck on this.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3S7VMx0nOqo[/ame]

 

[Christophera]

Hmmmmm, typical agent leaving out the violations of law by officials depriving the public of the building plans.

If this is not true post the agency which has them

 

[stannrodd]

Chri$$y Poos must be getting sick of not getting blood money clicks .. so he has started posting again at David Ickes forums again..

You could post your plans which show the CCC ..

Click here to his latest Colgate Clock, and usual, bullshit ...

He is truly a MORON.

 

[DiveCon]

Hmmmmm, typical agent leaving out the violations of law by officials depriving the public of the building plans.

If this is not true post the agency which has them

the city of NY
dumbass

 

[Christophera]

And they have people lying saying they have them but I know they do not. They will not release them, they said "those are very sensitive buildings".

I just called. Completely unreasonable, the buildings no longer exist.

We will have to use photos of the concrete core from 9-11 to know what stood. Our government has been infiltrated . . . but you know that, agent.

 

[DiveCon]

that discredited photo has already been proven to NOT show concrete

 

[Christophera]

You can only discredit yourself from being considered an American by stating that AND not producing evidence.

You have been discredited an an America over and over.

DI-asserts that steel has been pointed out on wtc 2 core pic.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2592230-post7403.html

D-posted 9-11 steel core before
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2563236-post7320.html

D-deny and lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2558644-post3137.html

D+Scanner anomalie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2554711-post7294.html

D-You post steel columns(?)
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2547786-post7282.html

NO PLANS
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959274-post145.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959289-post146.html

NO PLAN LINK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959580-post147.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959351-post3626.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1959578-post3627.html

D-rebar
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2529236-post3044.html

D-lie/posted 9-11 steel core before
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2525612-post3033.html
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2568662-post3179.html

D
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068183-post334.html

D-agent
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104806-post4606.html

D-rebar & plan links
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2331142-post6209.html

F+D exposed
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104963-post4610.html

D-SPIRE
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2476643-post7012.html

D+obvious difference
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2616159-post3308.html


Any assertion that I've posted evidence of steel core columns is nonsense. The only full length columns surrounded the core.

agents misrepresent "elevator guide rail support steel as "core columns".

 

[DiveCon]

no concrete in ANY of those photos

 

[Christophera]

I did not say I was posting images of concrete. I was shwoing how there are no steel core columns. agents most often misrepresent . . . everything.

Here is the concrete wall of the east side of the WTC 1 concrete core.