Finally figured out what the libs are pulling with this Russian hack business.

[TNHarley]

How many got convincted or wound up DEAD with Clinton???

Keep turning that blind eye!!!!

I'm not turning a blind eye. I'm just more objective than you. I can't stand that ****. Don't make me look like a bedwetter you ass

Oh yeah, because it's "objective" to ignore Democrat corruption. I get ya!

Lol dude I'm not ignoring shit. But you are. All I did was say I thought Reagan had a corrupt admin and the op could be true. How do you get I ignore dem corruption? I blast their bullshit every day. You are just a hack.
No shit

When you ignore the corruption of the Clinton admin to claim Reagan was more corrupt, and then claim you are objective, I call that hilarious!

Wow.

TNHarley correct me if I'm wrong: you did not vote for Hollary.

I have read many of TNHarley's posts. Dude hates HRC. A LOT. He's thinks she's corrupt and many other bad things, I'm sure. He's not a liberal.

Just because Reagan's was provably the most corrupt administration in recent and not so recent history does not mean Hillary Clinton is not corrupt also. It isn't either or. It's both. Don't get all pissy cause someone doesn't worship at the altar of Saint Reagan.

Fuckin' nutcase.

Fuck that corrupt bitch. Tp is just being an idiot

 

[teapartysamurai]

Oh yeah, because it's "objective" to ignore Democrat corruption. I get ya!

Lol dude I'm not ignoring shit. But you are. All I did was say I thought Reagan had a corrupt admin and the op could be true. How do you get I ignore dem corruption? I blast their bullshit every day. You are just a hack.
No shit

When you ignore the corruption of the Clinton admin to claim Reagan was more corrupt, and then claim you are objective, I call that hilarious!

I'm not ignoring shut you fucking idiot. I commented on the OP and you derail because you know in right. Pathetic
Next time, save some dignity.

OH, the butthurt is coming out.

How is it "derailing" to point out the Clinton admin was more corrupt when that what was on the ticket for 2016 by the Democrat party?

Stop the tantrums and get over it.

You don't even know who she would have picked you fucking idiot. The only "Clinton administration" there has ever been was by bill. And he didn't have 140 convictions. But Reagan did.
You can develop any strawman you like. You still look dumb

Excuse me, but are you a child? Born after 1990 or something?

I was around for the Clinton admin and remember Democrats calling Bill and Hill "co presidents!"

It was Hillary that ran Travelgate. It was Hillary that was over the Clinton Health Care plan.

She was extremely active in Bill's admin and everything she did turned into a scandal.

So, YES, it is very relevant. Now throw another tantrum, because I bring up facts that are inconvenient to the bubble you wish to live in.

 

[TNHarley]

Reagan would be a RINO by today's standards. But righties would take their life to defend him. He has done so much shit they bitch about every fucking day.. Its crazy
Reminds me of the Hillary supporters.

NOW who's derailing????

When you can't make the charge Reagan was corrupt (and probably guilty of the charge in the op) you try to change the subject to about whether Reagan was a Rino.

Even if he was, it has ZERO to do with the op and ZERO to do with our discussion. It's just a way to change the subject when you are losing.

Your entire fucking argument against me is a strawman that wasn't in the OP. Don't give give me your fake ass "gotcha" crap.
That needed to be said. Hopefully it brought you some self awareness

 

[teapartysamurai]

How many got convincted or wound up DEAD with Clinton???

Keep turning that blind eye!!!!

I'm not turning a blind eye. I'm just more objective than you. I can't stand that ****. Don't make me look like a bedwetter you ass

Oh yeah, because it's "objective" to ignore Democrat corruption. I get ya!

Lol dude I'm not ignoring shit. But you are. All I did was say I thought Reagan had a corrupt admin and the op could be true. How do you get I ignore dem corruption? I blast their bullshit every day. You are just a hack.
No shit

When you ignore the corruption of the Clinton admin to claim Reagan was more corrupt, and then claim you are objective, I call that hilarious!

Wow.

TNHarley correct me if I'm wrong: you did not vote for Hollary.

I have read many of TNHarley's posts. Dude hates HRC. A LOT. He's thinks she's corrupt and many other bad things, I'm sure. He's not a liberal.

Just because Reagan's was provably the most corrupt administration in recent and not so recent history does not mean Hillary Clinton is not corrupt also. It isn't either or. It's both. Don't get all pissy cause someone doesn't worship at the altar of Saint Reagan.

Fuckin' nutcase.

When you guys can bring up that evidence let us know.

All I have to do is say Whitewater, Travelgate, Rose Law firm, Hillarycare, Vince Foster, Clinton Impreachment, Bimbo-gate and on and on and on.

 

[TNHarley]

Lol dude I'm not ignoring shit. But you are. All I did was say I thought Reagan had a corrupt admin and the op could be true. How do you get I ignore dem corruption? I blast their bullshit every day. You are just a hack.
No shit

When you ignore the corruption of the Clinton admin to claim Reagan was more corrupt, and then claim you are objective, I call that hilarious!

I'm not ignoring shut you fucking idiot. I commented on the OP and you derail because you know in right. Pathetic
Next time, save some dignity.

OH, the butthurt is coming out.

How is it "derailing" to point out the Clinton admin was more corrupt when that what was on the ticket for 2016 by the Democrat party?

Stop the tantrums and get over it.

You don't even know who she would have picked you fucking idiot. The only "Clinton administration" there has ever been was by bill. And he didn't have 140 convictions. But Reagan did.
You can develop any strawman you like. You still look dumb

Excuse me, but are you a child? Born after 1990 or something?

I was around for the Clinton admin and remember Democrats calling Bill and Hill "co presidents!"

It was Hillary that ran Travelgate. It was Hillary that was over the Clinton Health Care plan.

She was extremely active in Bill's admin and everything she did turned into a scandal.

So, YES, it is very relevant. Now throw another tantrum, because I bring up facts that are inconvenient to the bubble you wish to live in.

My argument was about admin convictions. Your strawman is pathetic. What I said had nothing to do with policies. AGAIN I hate the Clinton's
Why are you acting so stupid?

 

[teapartysamurai]

Reagan would be a RINO by today's standards. But righties would take their life to defend him. He has done so much shit they bitch about every fucking day.. Its crazy
Reminds me of the Hillary supporters.

NOW who's derailing????

When you can't make the charge Reagan was corrupt (and probably guilty of the charge in the op) you try to change the subject to about whether Reagan was a Rino.

Even if he was, it has ZERO to do with the op and ZERO to do with our discussion. It's just a way to change the subject when you are losing.

Your entire fucking argument against me is a strawman that wasn't in the OP. Don't give give me your fake ass "gotcha" crap.
That needed to be said. Hopefully it brought you some self awareness

You brought up the strawman that the Reagan admin was one of the most corrupt admins in history.

You have provided no evidence and all I did was counter that the Clinton admin was far more corrupt.

How is that a strawman when I don't even argue about Reagan admin corruption, when I know a LOT of that so called "corruption" was contrived Democrat nonsense like in the op

I didn't bother, just pointed out the Reagan admin was the most corrupt is laughable in the face of the Clinton's and still you throw a tantrum.

You, just can't handle facts.

 

[teapartysamurai]

When you ignore the corruption of the Clinton admin to claim Reagan was more corrupt, and then claim you are objective, I call that hilarious!

I'm not ignoring shut you fucking idiot. I commented on the OP and you derail because you know in right. Pathetic
Next time, save some dignity.

OH, the butthurt is coming out.

How is it "derailing" to point out the Clinton admin was more corrupt when that what was on the ticket for 2016 by the Democrat party?

Stop the tantrums and get over it.

You don't even know who she would have picked you fucking idiot. The only "Clinton administration" there has ever been was by bill. And he didn't have 140 convictions. But Reagan did.
You can develop any strawman you like. You still look dumb

Excuse me, but are you a child? Born after 1990 or something?

I was around for the Clinton admin and remember Democrats calling Bill and Hill "co presidents!"

It was Hillary that ran Travelgate. It was Hillary that was over the Clinton Health Care plan.

She was extremely active in Bill's admin and everything she did turned into a scandal.

So, YES, it is very relevant. Now throw another tantrum, because I bring up facts that are inconvenient to the bubble you wish to live in.

My argument was about admin convictions. Your strawman is pathetic. What I said had nothing to do with policies. AGAIN I hate the Clinton's
Why are you acting so stupid?

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer

 

[bodecea]

I wouldn't doubt it honestly. He had one of the most corrupt administrations in history.

He did....so many of his administration convicted.

 

[bodecea]

I wouldn't doubt it honestly. He had one of the most corrupt administrations in history.

And that's why it had legs with liberals sans evidence. Because anyone that humiliates liberals as Reagan did, must be guilty of something.

That's liberal non-logic.

Idk man. I just know like 140 got convicted. Worst in history. Not to mention him supplying drugs to ameriucans and weapons to terrorists

How many got convincted or wound up DEAD with Clinton???

Keep turning that blind eye!!!!

You tell us, silly girl.....how many WERE "convincted"? And you have to prove that any death was the Clintons' fault....Your ridiculous conspiracy theories don't count.

 

[bodecea]

I'd only add a side motivation tps. The D's are in mega shit with their donors. Deep deep doo doo. They have to find a scapegoat.

Nyet, Comrade.......

 

[TNHarley]

Reagan would be a RINO by today's standards. But righties would take their life to defend him. He has done so much shit they bitch about every fucking day.. Its crazy
Reminds me of the Hillary supporters.

NOW who's derailing????

When you can't make the charge Reagan was corrupt (and probably guilty of the charge in the op) you try to change the subject to about whether Reagan was a Rino.

Even if he was, it has ZERO to do with the op and ZERO to do with our discussion. It's just a way to change the subject when you are losing.

Your entire fucking argument against me is a strawman that wasn't in the OP. Don't give give me your fake ass "gotcha" crap.
That needed to be said. Hopefully it brought you some self awareness

You brought up the strawman that the Reagan admin was one of the most corrupt admins in history.

You have provided no evidence and all I did was counter that the Clinton admin was far more corrupt.

How is that a strawman when I don't even argue about Reagan admin corruption, when I know a LOT of that so called "corruption" was contrived Democrat nonsense like in the op

I didn't bother, just pointed out the Reagan admin was the most corrupt is laughable in the face of the Clinton's and still you throw a tantrum.

You, just can't handle facts.

Lol last time I respond to you about this. It wasnt a strawman. It was the reason for my opinion. That's actually how you do this forum thing dude..talk.
Do you really need a link of the history of the guy you are defending? Do you understand how ignorant you sound? Especially about something so basic?
Yea, you "didn't bother" responding to what I actually said, you develop a strawman.
If you want to discuss corrupt policies of the Reagan and Clinton admin, I will make another thread in the bullring and we can dish it out.
Lol that actually sounds awesome. I have alot to say about both.
Are you game, or do you want to shut up now?

 

[TNHarley]

I'd only add a side motivation tps. The D's are in mega shit with their donors. Deep deep doo doo. They have to find a scapegoat.

Nyet, Comrade.......

Go Dyke a bull bode

 

[g5000]

Finally figured out what the libs are pulling with this Russian hack business

Figured it all by yourself, eh? Did your mommy give you a gold star?

 

[g5000]

The poor dumb rubes can't accept the truth that the Russians hacked the DNC. So they have to invent a delusion in which reality and truth are a fantasy.

These tards are fucking schizos.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Finally figured out what the libs are pulling with this Russian hack business

Figured it all by yourself, eh? Did your mommy give you a gold star?

Did your mommy give you this for all that butthurt after the election?

 

[Norman]

They NEVER change their playbook.

They have done this before.

In 1980, when Reagan shellacked them good (and humiliated them as much as Trump did now) the Democrats tried to retaliate.

They did by making the charge that Reagan had sent Bush (before the election) to negotiate with the Iranians to not release the hostages until AFTER election day.

There was NEVER a shred of evidence for it. But they made the charge over and over, even had hearings, and some idiot even wrote a book about it.

They are pulling the same bit with this Russian hack of the election.

It makes sense. Same story. Outside influence from a foreign government to affect our election, and a Republican "colluding" with them.

Trust me, they will try to impeach Trump as well, as they tried to pin that fiction on Reagan.

You just now figured that these people NEVER take the responsibility for ANYTHING, and always blame the neighbor instead? Despite the fact that they outright shove their ideology right down your throat...

Being around them too much has softened your neurons I am afraid...

 

[teapartysamurai]

The poor dumb rubes can't accept the truth that the Russians hacked the DNC. So they have to invent a delusion in which reality and truth are a fantasy.

These tards are fucking schizos.

Who's inventing the fantasy?

When you guys have the evidence of this "hack" do let us know.

When Obama won't release it, it's because it doesn't exist.

Obama Under "Intense Pressure" To Release Evidence Proving Russians Hacked The Election | Zero Hedge

 

[g5000]

This topic is textbook projection.

 

[g5000]

The poor dumb rubes can't accept the truth that the Russians hacked the DNC. So they have to invent a delusion in which reality and truth are a fantasy.

These tards are fucking schizos.

Who's inventing the fantasy?

All the tards who refuse to accept the Russians interfered in our elections. Tards like you who just needed that spelled out for you.

You're welcome.

 

[teapartysamurai]

This topic is textbook projection.

No, that's text book tit for tat. You don't like it, don't start it.

If you do, (and you did) don't whine when I do it better.