Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do realize that greed is one of the 7 deadly sins, right?
By the way........who determines who is "deserving"? You? Cash? What?
Paying for one's needs is Greed and a sin?
As If.
It would behoove you to recall some of the other deadly sins:
ENVY
SLOTH
GLUTTONY
Are particularly apt when discussing someone who is jealous that others have more than him, insists that they are his keepers, and expects them to foot his bills.
Envy........greedy fuckers are the ones that are always keeping up with the Jones', and therefore are more envious than those who aren't greedy.
Sloth.........greedy fuckers like to have others (read "little people") do the work for them while they rake in the profits. Think Wall St. and most CEO's.
Gluttony........greedy fuckers are the ones most likely to overindulge, thus resulting in gluttony.
You really ain't that bright are ya?
You do realize that telling some anonymous poster on a message board to 'shut up' makes you look pretty damned stupid, right?
I also believe in God. And I pray that He will judge us all on our merits as individuals - and not 'collectively'. I always leave it to God to decide who should or should not burn in hell - He knows far more than I do.... but if you're arrogant enough to judge others, that's your business.
But are you serious? Shut up! Until you can start thinking for yourself and stop telling people how they should their lives (no doubt your against a women's right to choose and you're against gay marriages) then I'll stop judging you and morons like yourself! God doesn't need you; nor me, to tell people how to live or the choices they can make. He is powerful enough to do that on his own!
mrrichards whatever, you keep harping on big business but this has nothing to do with ANY business. This is an issue of how one government is interacting with another. IE, how the city government is attempting to handle county government responsibilities. So please continue to blather like an abject moron about big business, but realize your arguments are totally baseless.
A vehicle moving on the public road ways is not the same as a house on its own lot. The tax bases to support infrastructure are from different sources.
Try again.
Okay, I stand corrected.
Would you like to respond the the liability issue which was the crux of the post?
"By the way, the neighbor whose grass caught fire is the actual cause of the fire which caused his neighbors house to burn.
It seems the neighbor who allowed his land to become a fire hazard breached his duty to the community and his neighbor.
The man who lost his house and all his possessions, lost three dogs and his grandchildren's cat, has a cause of action.
The suit will be quite interesting, I suspect, and hopefully very, very expensive.
I suspect the loss of $75 will pale in comparison to what the city will pay in legal fees and settlement costs."
But are you serious? Shut up! Until you can start thinking for yourself and stop telling people how they should their lives (no doubt your against a women's right to choose and you're against gay marriages) then I'll stop judging you and morons like yourself! God doesn't need you; nor me, to tell people how to live or the choices they can make. He is powerful enough to do that on his own!
mrrichards whatever, you keep harping on big business but this has nothing to do with ANY business. This is an issue of how one government is interacting with another. IE, how the city government is attempting to handle county government responsibilities. So please continue to blather like an abject moron about big business, but realize your arguments are totally baseless.
McDowell, you think this interaction worked out well where the firefighters just stood around and watched a family's home burned down the ground while endangering lives? If you could critically think for a moment, you would realize that it didn't work well! That's why people are talking about it, that's why it's on the news, and that's why people are outraged. The neighbors are furious that they had to witness their friend's house burning down while another house almost suffered the same fate! So what does this have to with big business? This is the model and the system that the corporations want to implement for America! What's next? Have the 911 operator ask you for an account number before she can send the Police over to your house while your wife is getting raped?Screw that! I'll take Government over Walmart any day! Open your eyes you blind idiot!
Question. I'm driving through this Tennessee town in my camper, a fire starts but i've not paid my $75 dollars. What's a firefighter to do?
By the way, the neighbor whose grass caught fire is the actual cause of the fire which caused his neighbors house to burn.
It seems the neighbor who allowed his land to become a fire hazard breached his duty to the community and his neighbor.
The man whose who lost his house and all his possessions, lost three dogs and his grandchildren's cat, has a cause of action.
The suit will be quite interesting, I suspect, and hopefully very, very expensive.
I suspect the loss of $75 will pale in comparison to what the city will pay in legal fees and settlement costs.
mrrichards whatever, you keep harping on big business but this has nothing to do with ANY business. This is an issue of how one government is interacting with another. IE, how the city government is attempting to handle county government responsibilities. So please continue to blather like an abject moron about big business, but realize your arguments are totally baseless.
McDowell, you think this interaction worked out well where the firefighters just stood around and watched a family's home burned down the ground while endangering lives? If you could critically think for a moment, you would realize that it didn't work well! That's why people are talking about it, that's why it's on the news, and that's why people are outraged. The neighbors are furious that they had to witness their friend's house burning down while another house almost suffered the same fate! So what does this have to with big business? This is the model and the system that the corporations want to implement for America! What's next? Have the 911 operator ask you for an account number before she can send the Police over to your house while your wife is getting raped?Screw that! I'll take Government over Walmart any day! Open your eyes you blind idiot!
The more exclamations marks you use, the more comical the post!
Just a helpful hint as you take your baby steps into the interwebz!!
Thanks for sharing.*sigh* Dear, I'm just highlighting your intellectual laziness because you've earned it.Damn, you ARE lazy.
Read, and discover like most of the rest of us.
Or, just keep showing us your intellectual laziness.
Why continue to provide evidence you're an asshole? Need the attention that badly?
Question. I'm driving through this Tennessee town in my camper, a fire starts but i've not paid my $75 dollars. What's a firefighter to do?
By the way, the neighbor whose grass caught fire is the actual cause of the fire which caused his neighbors house to burn.
It seems the neighbor who allowed his land to become a fire hazard breached his duty to the community and his neighbor.
The man whose who lost his house and all his possessions, lost three dogs and his grandchildren's cat, has a cause of action.
The suit will be quite interesting, I suspect, and hopefully very, very expensive.
I suspect the loss of $75 will pale in comparison to what the city will pay in legal fees and settlement costs.
bullshit, the cheap assed homeowner's grandson started the fire. his neighbord should sue him for the $500 firefighters bill.
Wow. 30 pages on this thread.. Not something I expected. But anyways, I didn't make this to support this guys decision not to pay the fee.. Although it's a stupid-ass system to begin with. I made it to disagree with the decision of the REPUBLICAN leaders in that area, to just let the house burn down.
No matter how many times I say that, you righties won't get it through your thick skulls. YES, THE GUY SHOULDA PAYED THE FEE.. AND YES, THE FIRE DEPT. SHOULDA PUT THE FIRE OUT ANYWAYS.
People in the area are outraged, and for good reason. I know If I were a paying neighbour, I'd be saying, put that shit out before it spreads to my home, and I get damaged.
What ever happened to just helping people regardless of profit/cost? Or even helping, then worrying about the cost? Why not just bill the guy after putting the fire out?
Imagine with me, if it had been one of those republican leaders who hadn't payed the fine.. And their house cought fire. Gu-ran-tee they woulda put it out. He would've demanded it.
A vehicle moving on the public road ways is not the same as a house on its own lot. The tax bases to support infrastructure are from different sources.
Try again.
Okay, I stand corrected.
Would you like to respond the the liability issue which was the crux of the post?
"By the way, the neighbor whose grass caught fire is the actual cause of the fire which caused his neighbors house to burn.
It seems the neighbor who allowed his land to become a fire hazard breached his duty to the community and his neighbor.
The man who lost his house and all his possessions, lost three dogs and his grandchildren's cat, has a cause of action.
The suit will be quite interesting, I suspect, and hopefully very, very expensive.
I suspect the loss of $75 will pale in comparison to what the city will pay in legal fees and settlement costs."
except for the fact that the fire started in a barrel in the cranick's back yard, and not in the neighbor's yard, that's a very interesting story.
not a word of truth to it, but very interesting.
Okay, I stand corrected.
Would you like to respond the the liability issue which was the crux of the post?
"By the way, the neighbor whose grass caught fire is the actual cause of the fire which caused his neighbors house to burn.
It seems the neighbor who allowed his land to become a fire hazard breached his duty to the community and his neighbor.
The man who lost his house and all his possessions, lost three dogs and his grandchildren's cat, has a cause of action.
The suit will be quite interesting, I suspect, and hopefully very, very expensive.
I suspect the loss of $75 will pale in comparison to what the city will pay in legal fees and settlement costs."
except for the fact that the fire started in a barrel in the cranick's back yard, and not in the neighbor's yard, that's a very interesting story.
not a word of truth to it, but very interesting.
Link
McDowell, you think this interaction worked out well where the firefighters just stood around and watched a family's home burned down the ground while endangering lives? If you could critically think for a moment, you would realize that it didn't work well! That's why people are talking about it, that's why it's on the news, and that's why people are outraged. The neighbors are furious that they had to witness their friend's house burning down while another house almost suffered the same fate! So what does this have to with big business? This is the model and the system that the corporations want to implement for America! What's next? Have the 911 operator ask you for an account number before she can send the Police over to your house while your wife is getting raped?Screw that! I'll take Government over Walmart any day! Open your eyes you blind idiot!
The more exclamations marks you use, the more comical the post!
Just a helpful hint as you take your baby steps into the interwebz!!
Comical that no one can prove me wrong and or try to justify the privatization of social services because it's complete bullshit and you really don't want to admit that you've been sucking big business cock all this time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
But it's not too late: WAKE UP SLEEPY HEADS; YOU'VE BEEN LIVING IN A DREAM WORLD CALLED FOX NEWS!!!! And I do stress the exclamation points and CAPS
Good luck to ya!
Where I live, it's against the law to burn trash outside.
Okay, I stand corrected.
Would you like to respond the the liability issue which was the crux of the post?
"By the way, the neighbor whose grass caught fire is the actual cause of the fire which caused his neighbors house to burn.
It seems the neighbor who allowed his land to become a fire hazard breached his duty to the community and his neighbor.
The man who lost his house and all his possessions, lost three dogs and his grandchildren's cat, has a cause of action.
The suit will be quite interesting, I suspect, and hopefully very, very expensive.
I suspect the loss of $75 will pale in comparison to what the city will pay in legal fees and settlement costs."
except for the fact that the fire started in a barrel in the cranick's back yard, and not in the neighbor's yard, that's a very interesting story.
not a word of truth to it, but very interesting.
Link
except for the fact that the fire started in a barrel in the cranick's back yard, and not in the neighbor's yard, that's a very interesting story.
not a word of truth to it, but very interesting.
Link
Where is the link to your version moron?
The problem with WC's alternative universe theory is that Cranick doesn't live in the city. The city is not responsible for him except to the extent that he subscribes to particular services it provides to unincorporated areas.
He declined to subscribe.
