First order of Republican House business tomorrow is…..

The lefts point of view is that when an employer makes profit, he or she should share that profit with their workers. Forget about the risks they took to start the business, the hours they work keeping it open, how they manage to keep it open during slow economic times while trying not to layoff employees. That doesn't matter. Employees take risks too. They have to drive to work every morning and punch the clock.

Sure, for all those risks and creating those jobs, an employer should make more money than their employees, just not too much more. They shouldn't be allowed to get rich while their low-skilled employees are just getting by in life. It's not their fault they never learned a skill or trade to make their services more valuable. It's the obligation of the employer to make up for their laziness and bad decisions. After all, they had children they could never afford and now they have to support them.
You can't teach basic Economics to a Leftest.

They don't any more about Economics than the know about History, Biology, Climate Science, Ethics or the Constitution.
 
You can't teach basic Economics to a Leftest.

They don't any more about Economics than the know about History, Biology, Climate Science, Ethics or the Constitution.
OK Skippy

Provide a credible definition of Socialism
This “Leftist” will wait
 
.

You can shitcan that ... You got it all wrong and I have told not to even try that crap with me.
Now let me read the rest of probably more interesting things you may have to say.

.
The truth of the matter is that coyote is a far left AUTHORITARIAN and you are far more liberal than she.
 
The truth of the matter is that coyote is a far left AUTHORITARIAN and you are far more liberal than she.
.

Well ... I can see where you came to that conclusion ... And I have myself at times arrived at one similar.

However ... I did later take the opportunity to explain to her where I felt those differences best presented themselves ...
And ... To her credit ... She at least pretended to be interested ... And showed some sense of understanding.

It's still kind of hard to break an Authoritarian though ... They tend to want more than they provide for themselves ...
And find that their aspirations would be much easier to achieve if they could just make everyone else do something.

They don't really understand Liberty ... Or the limits we have to the Power we grant others or the Government ...
It's not meant to solve everything ... The People still have their own responsibilities.

.
 
.

Well ... I can see where you came to that conclusion ... And I have myself at times arrived at one similar.

However ... I did later take the opportunity to explain to her where I felt those differences best presented themselves ...
And ... To her credit ... She at least pretended to be interested ... And showed some sense of understanding.

It's still kind of hard to break an Authoritarian though ... They tend to want more than they provide for themselves ...
And find that their aspirations would be much easier to achieve if they could just make everyone else do something.

They don't really understand Liberty ... Or the limits we have to the Power we grant others or the Government ...
It's not meant to solve everything ... The People still have their own responsibilities.

.
I tend to see authoritarians as a combination of idealogue, conformist and narcissist, myself.


The demand that the world act according to their own personal dictates is based upon a deep insecurity, though.
 
I tend to see authoritarians as a combination of idealogue, conformist and narcissist, myself.


The demand that the world act according to their own personal dictates is based upon a deep insecurity, though.
.

Are you trying to call me an authoritarian ... You Bastard ... :auiqs.jpg:
Well ... No one has ever called me a conformist ... But I have been called all the other things before.

.
 
People own nothing
It is the State that owns everything

You needed to pay more attention in class

Class in order:

What Is Socialism?​


Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on collective, common, or public ownership of the means of production. Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs. In contrast to capitalism, whereby business owners control the means of production and pay wages to workers to use those means, socialism envisions shared ownership and control among the laboring class.

 
Class in order:

What Is Socialism?​


Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on collective, common, or public ownership of the means of production. Those means of production include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs. In contrast to capitalism, whereby business owners control the means of production and pay wages to workers to use those means, socialism envisions shared ownership and control among the laboring class.

You didn’t do well in school did you?
You really don’t read well

Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on collective, common, or public ownership of the means of production.

It doesn’t mean private ownership of the means of production but collective ownership otherwise known as Capitalism
 
You didn’t do well in school did you?
You really don’t read well

Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on collective, common, or public ownership of the means of production.

It doesn’t mean private ownership of the means of production but collective ownership otherwise known as Capitalism

WTF do you think means of production is? WTF do you think public ownership means?
 

Forum List

Back
Top