Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #101
doi you realise their taxes are about as loiw as they have ever been?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
doi you realise their taxes are about as loiw as they have ever been?
The other end of the olive branch is on fire so it will and should be rejected.
so now he's using tax cuts for us to hit people over the head to get his WAY...
WHAT A thoughful dude
1. Do you believe that Americans need to make sacrifices to fix our fiscal problems?
if your answer is 'yes'
2. Do you believe that the sacrifice should be shared?
if your answer is 'yes'
3. What should be the sacrifice of America's wealthy/high income earners, as their share?
Be specific.
False choice. The wealthy already pay more than their fair share, as illustrated above.
Okay, that's one vote for the wealthy being exempted from the national sacrifice that needs to be made.
Question to you specifically:
What are you willing to sacrifice, since you accepted the premise that we need shared sacrifice (even though you exempt the Rich) as your share?
you would still get the entitlement whiners...
they dont have a job... so no pay check.. but still want to be in for the prize.
Good God....Does NO ONE want to think out of the box? OK....That'll be a MOTIVATION for people to go out and get a fucking job, right? If you're REALLY that worried about it....write it into the bylaws that people on Welfare aren't eligible.
But what if those on welfare had a job and the welfare is recent? Say they were already in on the lottery. Do you excuse them now because they don't fit your criteria? Do we exclude only some types of welfare and not others? Did you think this through at all or are you leaving all of the heavy thinking to others?
so now he's using tax cuts for us to hit people over the head to get his way...
What a thoughful dude
go ahead and pay more in taxes than you need to, you seem to think it's a good thing.
the two biggest reasons why the economy crashed under w was #1, the insane military spending and #2 the tax cuts to the rich.
are you saying our federal tax receipts crashed just before the credit crisis, then?
Getting rid of you sacred socialistic welfare state does not automatically translate to the sainted pooooooooor starving in the gutter.Good thing you're not envious or covetous, or anything like that.
Fuck you too. If you don't have a problem with the poor starving and homeless....fuck....that's on you. Not me.
But thanks for the meltdown to try and distract from your shameless avarice and greed.
If you taxed the rich at 100% for 5 years it wouldn't even make a dent.
Getting rid of you sacred socialistic welfare state does not automatically translate to the sainted pooooooooor starving in the gutter.Fuck you too. If you don't have a problem with the poor starving and homeless....fuck....that's on you. Not me.
But thanks for the meltdown to try and distract from your shameless avarice and greed.
It doesn't? You have a hell of a lot more faith in your "sainted riiiiich" than I do. Your people are the "let them eat cake" people of our generation.
Good God....Does NO ONE want to think out of the box? OK....That'll be a MOTIVATION for people to go out and get a fucking job, right? If you're REALLY that worried about it....write it into the bylaws that people on Welfare aren't eligible.
But what if those on welfare had a job and the welfare is recent? Say they were already in on the lottery. Do you excuse them now because they don't fit your criteria? Do we exclude only some types of welfare and not others? Did you think this through at all or are you leaving all of the heavy thinking to others?
Oh....so I am a lawmaker now? I'd say anyone who is working and drawing a paycheck would be eligible...yes....even if they get food stamps to make ends meet.
I give the fuck up. You people are so fucking hateful and miserable nothing will slake your thirst for blood unless all of the poor, elderly and afflicted are on their own and wealthy Corporations pay nothing in taxation.....you want the burden to fall directly on working people to pay for the Conglomerate muscle known as the military.
What you want is a return to the Feudal system. The wealthy control everything, the poor and sick die in the streets and everyone else is taxed to death and work their asses off for the benefit of the ruling class alone.
I'll tell you what...if one of your fellow Republicans proposed the lottery thing....you'd be masturbating on your computer chair....in fact, I got the idea from......wait for it......Rush Limbaugh......in the 90's, when Clinton was in office and I was GOP.
Getting rid of you sacred socialistic welfare state does not automatically translate to the sainted pooooooooor starving in the gutter.
But thanks for the meltdown to try and distract from your shameless avarice and greed.
It doesn't? You have a hell of a lot more faith in your "sainted riiiiich" than I do. Your people are the "let them eat cake" people of our generation.
tax those mother fuckers right outta the country then what ya gonna do? what will you replace the evil rich and corporations with? huh?
False choice. The wealthy already pay more than their fair share, as illustrated above.
Okay, that's one vote for the wealthy being exempted from the national sacrifice that needs to be made.
Question to you specifically:
What are you willing to sacrifice, since you accepted the premise that we need shared sacrifice (even though you exempt the Rich) as your share?
LOL
Look up 'false choice', tard.
The two biggest reasons why the economy crashed under W was #1, the insane military spending and #2 the tax cuts to the rich.
Both of these need huge cuts but the GOP is being a bunch of babies that doesn't give a damn about balancing the budget, only to keep bankrolling their cronies.
#1 was the housing bubble The tax cuts resulted in 5.2% unemployment until the Democrats took over Congress in 2006. Nothing insane about giving troops engaged in combat all of the weapons they need to survive.
If you think raising the tax rates on the few making over $250,000 will balance the budget, you are the one that is insane. There has already been a huge cut in military spending and theSec of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told Marines and sailors on Fridaythat Congress would be irresponsible if it doesn't act to prevent drastic military budget cuts.
Read more: Defense secretary Panetta blasts defense budget cuts in visit to ship off California coast | Fox News
Try again, Fox? what a joke!
Thanks for reminding me of that horrific Bush spending spree with TARP as well
WASHINGTON (AP) Defense Secretary Leon Panetta pleaded with Congress Wednesday to avoid the disaster of automatic defense cuts even as he criticized lawmakers' affection for protecting aging ships and aircraft.
Ramping up the pressure, Panetta and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, painted a bleak picture of the military and its power if the across-the-board reductions, known as "sequestration," go into effect beginning Jan. 2.
Panetta referred to the threat of the additional cuts as he urged lawmakers to come together to defuse it by finding other ways of reducing the debt.
But my hope is that when members understand the sacrifice involved in reducing the defense budget by almost a half a trillion dollars that it will convince Congress of the important responsibility they have to make sure that we avoid sequestration, he said. That would be a doubling of the cuts, another $500 billion in additional cuts that would be required to take place through a meat- axe approach, and that we are convinced would hollow out the force and would inflict severe damage to our national defense for generations.
False choice. The wealthy already pay more than their fair share, as illustrated above.
Okay, that's one vote for the wealthy being exempted from the national sacrifice that needs to be made.
Question to you specifically:
What are you willing to sacrifice, since you accepted the premise that we need shared sacrifice (even though you exempt the Rich) as your share?
LOL
Look up 'false choice', tard.
I'm not the one trying to justify being a rapacious looter...You are.Getting rid of you sacred socialistic welfare state does not automatically translate to the sainted pooooooooor starving in the gutter.Fuck you too. If you don't have a problem with the poor starving and homeless....fuck....that's on you. Not me.
But thanks for the meltdown to try and distract from your shameless avarice and greed.
It doesn't? You have a hell of a lot more faith in your "sainted riiiiich" than I do. Your people are the "let them eat cake" people of our generation.