Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The National Security Advisor earns $183,000 a year.“Rich”? Net worth of approx $600k. He was not rich by any means. You need to take a finance class.Flynn was rich, well connected, and the right hand man to the incoming president of the united states. He could afford the best lawyers that money could buy, and you claim he was "coerced?""
He took his plea awayPresident Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Actually, there was. And it is documented.
Because no one can even agree on the facts much less the truth.I do not want to piece it together. I just want the truth. Why is that so hard to garner?I think there are sources that take a more honest approach, looking at it from multiple sides, trying to look at the actual law involved. I think you can piece together a fairly accurate picture from multiple sources.Nope. Some say he committed a crime. Others say it’s not a crime. Some say he plead because he was forced to. Others say he plead because he was guilty. Some say the surveillance was legitimate and others say it’s not. Would you bet your life you know exactly what happened?They all are to some degree. You just need to read critically imo.Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Actually, there was. And it is documented.
He did do that.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
____Are you going to play "the jerk" card. Claim that Flynn was born a poor black child?And the poor Black kid who was beaten daily in a rural Mississippi jail in the 1950's claimed he was not coerced either---when he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit....to stop the torture.
It is a discredit to you that you can't see the difference between that physical torture...and the psychological, emotional, and financial torture that General Flynn was put through by Goons who behaved not much different than the rural Mississippi Sheriffs.
Flynn was rich, well connected, and the right hand man to the incoming president of the united states. He could afford the best lawyers that money could buy, and you claim he was "coerced?""
You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Actually, there was. And it is documented.
How exactly is his son implicated.
Be precise.
www.forbes.com
So? Show us what crime his son is even accused of you fucking lunatic.You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Actually, there was. And it is documented.
How exactly is his son implicated.
Be precise.
His son is a key member of the business, actively involved with his father.
Will Michael Flynn Plead Guilty And Cooperate To Protect His Son?
With Michael T. Flynn facing possible indictment, Special Counsel Mueller likely is using the threat of also prosecuting Flynn’s son for leverage. This Wall Street prosecution tested tactic from Enron and Drexel may result in a guilty plea, with the question cooperation against whom.
Nope. Had to sell his house to pay for his defense. He was an army man most of his life. He was middle class not rich.The National Security Advisor earns $183,000 a year.“Rich”? Net worth of approx $600k. He was not rich by any means. You need to take a finance class.Flynn was rich, well connected, and the right hand man to the incoming president of the united states. He could afford the best lawyers that money could buy, and you claim he was "coerced?""
Plus he had outside income:
Mueller Probes Flynn's Role in Alleged Plan to Deliver Cleric ...
www.wsj.com › articles › mueller-probes-flynns-role-in-al...
Nov 10, 2017 - Flynn and his son, Michael Flynn Jr., were to be paid as much as $15 million for delivering Fethullah Gulen to the Turkish government,
Now you’re singing my tune and it’s the media’s fault. Shame on them.Because no one can even agree on the facts much less the truth.I do not want to piece it together. I just want the truth. Why is that so hard to garner?I think there are sources that take a more honest approach, looking at it from multiple sides, trying to look at the actual law involved. I think you can piece together a fairly accurate picture from multiple sources.Nope. Some say he committed a crime. Others say it’s not a crime. Some say he plead because he was forced to. Others say he plead because he was guilty. Some say the surveillance was legitimate and others say it’s not. Would you bet your life you know exactly what happened?They all are to some degree. You just need to read critically imo.Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
Keep bumping it lunatic. I am conversing with Westwall, a far better person. You can wait your turn or take a number.So? Show us what crime his son is even accused of you fucking lunatic.You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Actually, there was. And it is documented.
How exactly is his son implicated.
Be precise.
His son is a key member of the business, actively involved with his father.
Will Michael Flynn Plead Guilty And Cooperate To Protect His Son?
With Michael T. Flynn facing possible indictment, Special Counsel Mueller likely is using the threat of also prosecuting Flynn’s son for leverage. This Wall Street prosecution tested tactic from Enron and Drexel may result in a guilty plea, with the question cooperation against whom.
Coyote
Watch how this fucking hack avoids my question..
HINT: I will bump this to humiliate you.
You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia._______President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.
Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.
These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.
So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.
They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.
There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."
Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.
This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.
Get Help.
Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Actually, there was. And it is documented.
How exactly is his son implicated.
Be precise.
His son is a key member of the business, actively involved with his father.
Will Michael Flynn Plead Guilty And Cooperate To Protect His Son?
With Michael T. Flynn facing possible indictment, Special Counsel Mueller likely is using the threat of also prosecuting Flynn’s son for leverage. This Wall Street prosecution tested tactic from Enron and Drexel may result in a guilty plea, with the question cooperation against whom.
Not at all what I said Shasta.TO TRAP TRUMP IN A LIE ?
RIIIIIIIIIIGHT
STFU u watermelon seed eater
Which means what? Show me a crime.
Thank you Peter Stzrok.Here is the beauty of Judge Sullivan's Flynn trap:
Sullivan’s order points to the glaring issue with the Trump administration’s attempt to dismiss the charges against a man who twice pleaded guilty in federal court to lying to the FBI about his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States: If Flynn didn’t, in fact, lie to the FBI about his communications with the ambassador, then he lied to the judge when he repeatedly swore in court that he was guilty of that crime.
Judge Weighs Holding Michael Flynn In Contempt, Keeping Guilty Plea In Place
Judge Sullivan appointed a former judge to argue against a Justice Department motion to drop the charges against a former Trump administration official.www.huffpost.com
So, was Flynn lying then - or is he lying now? Either way is PERJURY.
And you're really Lisa Page aren't you ?You mean using his son as leverage? Yet his son implicated. It is a common tactic. When is it ok and when is it not ok?
Why Did the Central Park 5 lie to the judge claiming they were making the plea under their own free will, and was not coerced by their lawyers or anyone.Actually, there was. And it is documented.There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
Then why did Flynn lie to the judge, claiming he was making the plea under his own free will, and was NOT coerced by his lawyers or anyone.
Not a good move to lie to the judge.
