Flynn Admitted to Lying Under Oath

President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.
We should go back to the days before Brown v. Mississippi, right?

Beat those black dudes into pleading guilty, then point to their guilty plea as evidence of their guilt?

Sound good to you?

.

Then you need to throw out every single guilty plea don't you? It might have coerced after all.....might have been entrapped....no evidence needed to show that either. Just do it.....

Flynn is on record saying different things to different people and lying to the FBI. You and I would not get away with that.
Still denying reality, huh Hack?

You really need to get educated on just how this case is blowing up in YOUR face, Moron.
 
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.
You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?







Actually, there was. And it is documented.
 
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.
You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
____

And the poor Black kid who was beaten daily in a rural Mississippi jail in the 1950's claimed he was not coerced either---when he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit....to stop the torture.

It is a discredit to you that you can't see the difference between that physical torture...and the psychological, emotional, and financial torture that General Flynn was put through by Goons who behaved not much different than the rural Mississippi Sheriffs.

It is more and more apparent that Flynn's major offenses were: 1) to defy Obama in his appeasement of Iran...for which he got fired...and then 2) to become an advisor to Don Trump, knowing where all the Obama bodies were buried.




____
 
Then you need to throw out every single guilty plea don't you?
Only for those defendants who want to change their plea, like Flynn.
:dunno:

But, you are seriously NOT a liberal. You seem to give not one single fuck about the abusive nature of the FBI's "lying to investigators" power. You don't see the opportunity for serious abuse, and the very evidence of the same?


.
The problem here is we do not agree on the facts and you have not provided any actual evidence.

Neither you nor I see everything, all the evidence, all the documents. So what it comes down to is this: who do you trust? Who’s accounting of the evidence?

You trust what is being presented to you through your rightwing news sources. You trust Barr. You trust the Trump Administration.

I trust the person who has seen all the evidence, and ruled accordingly. And the only one who does not have political horse in this. The judge.

And it seems the only argument your side comes up now with is “if you don’t believe our side, our interpretation of the evidence, you are (insert expletives)”.

Frankly, I don’t think you are much of a liberal either.
 
Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
 
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.
You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
____

And the poor Black kid who was beaten daily in a rural Mississippi jail in the 1950's claimed he was not coerced either---when he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit....to stop the torture.

It is a discredit to you that you can't see the difference between that physical torture...and the psychological, emotional, and financial torture that General Flynn was put through by Goons who behaved not much different than the rural Mississippi Sheriffs.

It is more and more apparent that Flynn's major offenses were: 1) to defy Obama in his appeasement of Iran...for which he got fired...and then 2) to become an advisor to Don Trump, knowing where all the Obama bodies were buried.




____

Oh good god. It is a discredit to you that you are now comparing Flynn, treated with kid gloves, to a black youth in MS in the 50’s. Can you get any lower?
 
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
President Trump said that he canned Flynn for the lies he told.

Even the VP corroborated that story and said that Flynn lied.

These are all documented things, stemming from an under oath admission.

So were all these people lying THEN or are they lying now? Can't be both.






Flogging a dead horse are ya? He plead guilty to lying to the fbi, even though he didn't. He did it to save his son who the fbi were threatening to go after. Why do you, a supposed deep thinker, approve of such an outrageous abuse of power? You MUST be a obummer whore. Only statist, anti American scumbags, approve of such an abridgment of the rule of law.

They are deliberately ignoring the documented crimes done against General Flynn, because it goes against the leftist narrative. Heck just unmasking him is a FEDERAL crime.

There were no crimes done against vainglorious and deceitful General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury, his attempts to have it reversed thrown out. The judge has seen all the documentation. Like all of Trumps criminal crony's - he will remain a free man regardless of what the judge (and jury) determines because he has the right connections: Trump and Russia.
_______
"General Flynn. He was convicted by a jury..."

Your disqualifying ignorance on the matter is shown by your statement highlighted above.

This post is pure TDS. No facts, just rabid hate driving you to the point of psychopathology.

Get Help.
You're right, he wasn't convicted by a jury - he went ahead and plead guilty. Twice.

Your automated Trump Defense Syndrome is duly noted.
And your complete lack of honesty, integrity, and any sort of actual knowledge of the event being discussed are duly noted. Then again I’ve proven you a lying ignorant bitch multiple times. Now to slap you again. Coerced confessions aren’t valid. You lose. Again.

There was no coercion per Flynn. Any more lies you want to parrot?
____

And the poor Black kid who was beaten daily in a rural Mississippi jail in the 1950's claimed he was not coerced either---when he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit....to stop the torture.

It is a discredit to you that you can't see the difference between that physical torture...and the psychological, emotional, and financial torture that General Flynn was put through by Goons who behaved not much different than the rural Mississippi Sheriffs.

It is more and more apparent that Flynn's major offenses were: 1) to defy Obama in his appeasement of Iran...for which he got fired...and then 2) to become an advisor to Don Trump, knowing where all the Obama bodies were buried.




____

Oh good god. It is a discredit to you that you are now comparing Flynn, treated with kid gloves, to a black youth in MS in the 50’s. Can you get any lower?
____

Can you get any deeper into partisan denial?

Kid Gloves?
 
And the poor Black kid who was beaten daily in a rural Mississippi jail in the 1950's claimed he was not coerced either---when he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit....to stop the torture.

It is a discredit to you that you can't see the difference between that physical torture...and the psychological, emotional, and financial torture that General Flynn was put through by Goons who behaved not much different than the rural Mississippi Sheriffs.
Are you going to play "the jerk" card. Claim that Flynn was born a poor black child?

Flynn was rich, well connected, and the right hand man to the incoming president of the united states. He could afford the best lawyers that money could buy, and you claim he was "coerced?""
 
Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
They all are to some degree. You just need to read critically imo.
Nope. Some say he committed a crime. Others say it’s not a crime. Some say he plead because he was forced to. Others say he plead because he was guilty. Some say the surveillance was legitimate and others say it’s not. Would you bet your life you know exactly what happened?
 
And the poor Black kid who was beaten daily in a rural Mississippi jail in the 1950's claimed he was not coerced either---when he pled guilty to a crime he didn't commit....to stop the torture.

It is a discredit to you that you can't see the difference between that physical torture...and the psychological, emotional, and financial torture that General Flynn was put through by Goons who behaved not much different than the rural Mississippi Sheriffs.
Are you going to play "the jerk" card. Claim that Flynn was born a poor black child?

Flynn was rich, well connected, and the right hand man to the incoming president of the united states. He could afford the best lawyers that money could buy, and you claim he was "coerced?""
“Rich”? Net worth of approx $600k. He was not rich by any means. You need to take a finance class.
 
Oh good god. It is a discredit to you that you are now comparing Flynn, treated with kid gloves, to a black youth in MS in the 50’s. Can you get any lower?
If they waterboarded Flynn, they could get him to confess to anything.
 
Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
They all are to some degree. You just need to read critically imo.
Nope. Some say he committed a crime. Others say it’s not a crime. Some say he plead because he was forced to. Others say he plead because he was guilty. Some say the surveillance was legitimate and others say it’s not. Would you bet your life you know exactly what happened?
I think there are sources that take a more honest approach, looking at it from multiple sides, trying to look at the actual law involved. I think you can piece together a fairly accurate picture from multiple sources.
 
Then you need to throw out every single guilty plea don't you?
Only for those defendants who want to change their plea, like Flynn.
:dunno:

But, you are seriously NOT a liberal. You seem to give not one single fuck about the abusive nature of the FBI's "lying to investigators" power. You don't see the opportunity for serious abuse, and the very evidence of the same?


.
The problem here is we do not agree on the facts and you have not provided any actual evidence.

Neither you nor I see everything, all the evidence, all the documents. So what it comes down to is this: who do you trust? Who’s accounting of the evidence?

You trust what is being presented to you through your rightwing news sources. You trust Barr. You trust the Trump Administration.

I trust the person who has seen all the evidence, and ruled accordingly. And the only one who does not have political horse in this. The judge.

And it seems the only argument your side comes up now with is “if you don’t believe our side, our interpretation of the evidence, you are (insert expletives)”.

Frankly, I don’t think you are much of a liberal either.
You trust the guy who was fed fake information, hack.

Get up to speed, Moron.
 
Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
They all are to some degree. You just need to read critically imo.
Nope. Some say he committed a crime. Others say it’s not a crime. Some say he plead because he was forced to. Others say he plead because he was guilty. Some say the surveillance was legitimate and others say it’s not. Would you bet your life you know exactly what happened?
I think there are sources that take a more honest approach, looking at it from multiple sides, trying to look at the actual law involved. I think you can piece together a fairly accurate picture from multiple sources.
WTF you "think" is meaningless you fucking lunatic.

Get a clue and try to look at the actual facts for once in your pathetic hack life.
 
Case in point. We cannot trust our media. We have no idea what really happened. I wish we had at least one honest media source.
They all are to some degree. You just need to read critically imo.
Nope. Some say he committed a crime. Others say it’s not a crime. Some say he plead because he was forced to. Others say he plead because he was guilty. Some say the surveillance was legitimate and others say it’s not. Would you bet your life you know exactly what happened?
I think there are sources that take a more honest approach, looking at it from multiple sides, trying to look at the actual law involved. I think you can piece together a fairly accurate picture from multiple sources.
I do not want to piece it together. I just want the truth. Why is that so hard to garner?
 

Forum List

Back
Top