Circe
Platinum Member
- Jan 28, 2013
- 13,922
- 7,009
I think you are wrong about the gelding of black males by Arabs. The Mamelukes were gelded but they were white captives and were set to work doing high-level government stuff --- taxes and such. The Chinese certainly gelded anyone who worked in the Emperor's area (Forbidden City) but these were not slaves and were jealous of the privilege and often it was done by themselves to get the job or by their fathers. There are photos on the Internet --- it didn't stop till well into the last century.You missed the point. The African blacks were ALREADY slaves. The choice was to keep them there as slaves to other blacks, sell them to the Arabs who would geld all the males resulting in a seventy to eighty percent die off from infections and march them to North Africa, or sell them to whites who would bring them to the new world where a small percentage would be sold in the English Colonies or the USA for a short time, and the majority would be sent to the Caribbean and South American where they would be worked to death. Which was the better, or at least, the least bad, option for the black slaves enslaved by other blacks in Africa?
Almost no gelding of male slaves happened anywhere, as far as I've read, probably because of just what you say: too many would have died of infections. It is true slaves were mostly worked to death early on (not later when they became more valuable because the British stopped the slave trade in 1806) but they didn't compound the problem of them dying with that kind of additional injury.
Which has always seemed strange to me in a way because I've lived on a large-stock farm forever, and you really canNOT manage large male animals otherwise. The testosterone problem is huge.