Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama, Crooked Hillary and about every shithead Democrat holding office in the US.
The only thing that has kept the filthy Democrats from banning firearms was the fact that the shitheads have not control Congress since 2010.
None of them want outright bans. So that is a lie.
Obama left guns alone until Sandy Hook. Gee, god forbid he act after a bunch of 5 yr olds were turned to hamburger !
I belong to two different militia groups, which are none of your business, but that has zero to do with my right to bear arms...it says the right of the people,, not the right of the militia
Nope, it specifically states militia. If belonging to a militia is irrelevant why even have it in the second at all? hint: It does matter. BS, I bet you don't belong to any legal entity or militia.
do you know what well regulated meant in the vernacular of the 18th century?what part of shall not be infringed do you not understandthat's not a bad idea at all
No, that would be terrible .
Only to you anti gun nuts.
You use to be able to go into Sears and walk out with a firearm and no paper work required. That was real Liberty that you filthy Libtards destroyed.
Real liberty ? Nothing says liberty like every psycho and criminal being able to buy a gun on demand !
You are a great example of a delusional gun nut .
What part of "well regulated " do you not understand?
See, I can also cherry pick language !
The opinion of one person.you are a liar
So you didn't post this in post 23 ?
I don't have a problem with it in the least. I'm against background checks, against paperwork for purchases, all of that
Public information does not require a search warrant so looking for a felony conviction is not an unconstitutional searchits unreasonable for someone to have to be searched to exercise a constitutional right[
they are both constitutionally protected rights, I'm not responsible for him or her if they abuse them
The fourth has the word 'reasonable' in it. I don't think it unreasonable that you have to have a background check.
[Q
And tell me how does any gun law passed after Sandy Hook prevent that type of thing from happening again
FYI I live in CT so I can tell you the only people affected by any post Sandy Hook law are the law abiding gun owners who will never kill anyone
[Q
do you know what well regulated meant in the vernacular of the 18th century?
HINT: it didn't mean governemnt controlled
well evidently you are cool with warrantless searches too
Are you an American citizen? If so, your knowledge of American history sucks ass!
Why were the battles of Lexington and Concord fought? Hint: It had EVERYTHING to do with guns!
It wasn't known as the "popcorn fart heard 'round the world"!
Simpy pathetic!
Isn't Hillary one of your own? She wanted to ban guns! You are the liar!
You are confused about this.
Commie states like California and New York have significantly restricted the right to keep and bear arms for everybody including that do not have a history of mental illness or being a felon. In some Democrat control states almost every firearm that I own now would be illegal to own so don't give us that lying bullshit about "you can have your firearms"..
In New Jersey a few weeks ago a guy from out of state with no criminal history or intent to commit a crime was arrested for the mere possession of a firearm. In New York last year a veteran had his firearms confiscated by the jackbooted government thugs because he had gone to the doctor for a mild case of insomnia. That is a great example of why we can't trust you stupid Liberals to restrict our Liberties.
If you continue to be confused about the filthy ass Libtards wanting to take the right to keep and bear arms away from law abiding citizens I can give you many more examples. Obama would have passed a very restrictive anti gun bill if he would have had the support in Congress. He said so. Crooked Hillary ran on an anti right to keep and bear arms platform and that is one of the reasons she lost.
then why is it the right of the people?
Oh yeah the people, all people, were considered to be the militia
Yeah we could have won the Revolutionary war with slingshotsfirst of all, do you not realize gun grabbing is why we are an independent nation NOW?
we fought a revolution over this(both my country, from the crown, and my state, from Mexico)
plus, there is more of a chance of you sleeping with Pam Grier than of the second being repealed.
No, you are an independent nation because British citizens of the US colonies didn't want to be taxed without representation. Had little or nothing to do with guns.
Pam was great....for an old broad...
You do know that law abiding citizens far outnumber criminals don't you?
The more law abiding citizens that are armed the less safe criminals feel committing crimes
You are confused about this.
Commie states like California and New York have significantly restricted the right to keep and bear arms for everybody including that do not have a history of mental illness or being a felon. In some Democrat control states almost every firearm that I own now would be illegal to own so don't give us that lying bullshit about "you can have your firearms"..
In New Jersey a few weeks ago a guy from out of state with no criminal history or intent to commit a crime was arrested for the mere possession of a firearm. In New York last year a veteran had his firearms confiscated by the jackbooted government thugs because he had gone to the doctor for a mild case of insomnia. That is a great example of why we can't trust you stupid Liberals to restrict our Liberties.
If you continue to be confused about the filthy ass Libtards wanting to take the right to keep and bear arms away from law abiding citizens I can give you many more examples. Obama would have passed a very restrictive anti gun bill if he would have had the support in Congress. He said so. Crooked Hillary ran on an anti right to keep and bear arms platform and that is one of the reasons she lost.
Almost is not all. Give examples of what sort of firearms of yours they want to ban?
Also, credible links to your NJ and NY examples
You really are confused aren't you Moon Bat? That is typical for you Libtards, isn't it?
Every one of the 23 AR-15s that I have would be illegal in California and would be greatly restricted in other states. So would my M-14s, AKs, M-1 Carbines and FALs. Even my semi auto Ruger 10-22 . There are several states where my 300 AR-15 standard capacity magazines would be illegal.
It was New York and not New Jersey.
http://nypost.com/2017/05/30/hotel-guest-arrested-for-going-back-to-get-his-gun/
Hotel guest arrested after going back to get his gun
An out-of-towner who stashed his loaded handgun under the mattress in his Brooklyn hotel room, and then called the front desk after checking out to say he forgot it, will be spending at least one more night in the Big Apple — as a guest of the state.
Torrie Flock, 23, of Charlotte, N.C., rang the front desk at the Harbor Motor Inn on Shore Parkway in Gravesend Monday afternoon to say he’d left a .45-caliber Smith & Wesson under the mattress in Room 218, officials said.
When he returned to retrieve the firearm around 1:30 p.m., cops were waiting and arrested him.
Blog: Guns Confiscated after Man Seeks Insomnia Treatment
January 2, 2015
Guns Confiscated after Man Seeks Insomnia Treatment
The complaint contends that Montgomery, a Navy veteran and retired police officer who rose to the rank of detective sergeant during his 30-year career, voluntarily sought treatment for insomnia at a hospital on Long Island in May of 2014 after relocating to a new home several hundred miles from his previous residence.
Nonetheless, the suit contends that five days after being discharged from the hospital, the local sheriff’s department showed up at Montgomery’s door and seized his four registered handguns, including his former duty sidearm, after the sheriff had been subjected to “repeated pressure” by the New York State Police, who claimed that Montgomery had been declared mentally defective and had been involuntarily committed to a mental institution.
[QU
He kept his gun under his mattress??? When in Rome. NY laws are NY laws.
The second one sounds dodgy. If true, I hope Montgomery wins not only the right to get his firearms back but money as well.
I think it's fantastic that your A15 would be confiscated. Why anybody would need such a weapon is beyond me. Well, if you lived in Somalia maybe.
No. They were to be ready to be called into service which was just one reason the people have the right to keep and bear arms it is not the only reasonthen why is it the right of the people?
Oh yeah the people, all people, were considered to be the militia
That's right. They were to belong to a militia. Do they all belong now? You're talking 1776 back when there were still slaves and only land owning men could vote. Things change.
You do know that law abiding citizens far outnumber criminals don't you?
The more law abiding citizens that are armed the less safe criminals feel committing crimes
And yet you have one of the biggest crime rates in the civilised world. Higher than most European countries that have strict gun laws. You might want to try that one again....
