Forbes/Harris poll: Majority say verdict rigged...

[Catsnmeters]

God you people should stop voting. The state charge was only a misdemeanor, now go educate your ignorant little pea brain how they turned that into a felony.

Yes but it was escalated to a felony by the secondary crimes. Then it was a felony state charge.

He wasn't charged with the secondary crimes and they don't need to show intent for those secondary crimes.

 

[jknowgood]

Or new evidence came to light and Trump was t president anymore so he could be indicted.

On what grounds?

When you make felonies out of a misdemeanor. It won't hold up.

 

[BluesLegend]

Yes but it was escalated to a felony by the secondary crimes. Then it was a felony state charge.

He wasn't charged with the secondary crimes and they don't need to show intent for those secondary crimes.

The SCOTUS will decide that corrupt state Dem scum did not have jurisdiction to butt into a FEC matter. The Trump SCOTUS is going to take a giant shit on this sham fake conviction. Here have one of these you will need it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They won't need to. I think NY will do it.

Hope all you want.

 

[Missourian]

No answer, huh.

You could have just said that.

 

[Catsnmeters]

When you make felonies out of a misdemeanor. It won't hold up.

Why do your media outlets hide relevant facts from you?

It's the law based on precedent...

People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21 | Casetext Search + Citator

Read People v. Taveras, 12 N.Y.3d 21, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

casetext.com

"We...reject defendant's contention that a separate crime automatically becomes a material element of falsifying business records in the first degree whenever the People rely on the “intent to conceal” prong of that statute on the theory that concealment, as opposed to an intent to commit another crime or aid in the commission thereof, presupposes a prior completed crime. Read as a whole, it is clear that falsifying business records in the second degree is elevated to a first-degree offense on the basis of an enhanced intent requirement—“an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof”—not any additional actus reus element (Penal Law § 175.10)."

 

[Catsnmeters]

The SCOTUS will decide that corrupt state Dem scum did not have jurisdiction to butt into a FEC matter. The Trump SCOTUS is going to take a giant shit on this sham fake conviction. Here have one of these you will need it.

It's a state charge. The FEC has nothing to do with it.

It's disturbing you want the federal legislature meddling in state laws.

Have you heard of separation of powers between states and the fed? I can post a link if you want to read out on it. Hell, it's the reason sanctuary cities are protected by the constitution. You should know these things.

 

[OKTexas]

Hope all you want.

Thanks I will.

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

No answer, huh.

You could have just said that.

Well, since not a single thing that you listed as the opposite of you applies to me, not sure what you would want me to say

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yes, Trump is a felon as of the moment he was convicted.

Yes, a person becomes a felon when they are convicted of a felony. A felony is a serious crime punishable by death or a minimum term of one year in state or federal prison1. Here’s what we can expect regarding rights and restrictions for someone who is now officially a convicted felon, like former President Donald Trump:

1. Running for President: Trump could still run for president. As long as he meets the eligibility criteria (over 35, natural-born citizen, and resident of the U.S. for at least 14 years), a felony conviction does not automatically disqualify him2.
2. Voting Rights: In Florida, where Trump is registered to vote, felons are ineligible to vote only if the conviction would make them ineligible to vote in the state where they were convicted. Since New York law allows felons to maintain voting rights upon release from prison, Trump can still vote there2.
3. Gun Ownership: Under both federal law and New York state law, felons cannot legally possess firearms. However, Trump could seek to have that right restored, especially since his conviction was for a lower-level non-violent felony2.
4. International Travel: While travel restrictions may be imposed as part of sentencing, it’s unlikely that Trump would face such restrictions unless there’s concern about flight risk2.

In summary, a felony conviction does impact certain rights, but it doesn’t necessarily prevent someone from running for office or voting, depending on the specific state laws and circumstances2.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

It was a state charge, not federal.

The FEC violation is a Federal charge, goofy.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

View attachment 956356

Nope, it is correct. All humans are biased, and all judges are human.

Oh, so it's ok to have a racist judge on the bench? Is that what you're saying?...lol

 

[Catsnmeters]

The FEC violation is a Federal charge, goofy.

They were not charged with an FEC crime.

They were charged with falsifying business records in New York...which of course is a state crime.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The FEC violation is a Federal charge, goofy.

Bill Bob, it was a state charge.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Oh, so it's ok to have a racist judge on the bench? Is that what you're saying?...lol

I said nothing about racism and nothing about it being ok.

I pointed out a fact of life, all humans are biased.

 

[SavannahMann]

Everything about it was a sham. A biased judge, a biased jury, judge was hostile to the defendant, judge was hostile to defense witnesses, judge refused to allow exculpatory evidence into testimony, made up crimes, made standards of guilt. The judge actually told the jury "if you think the defendant had intent to commit a crime", that's good enough for a guilty verdict. Only a fucking moron would think that "thinking" someone is guilty is an acceptable legal standard.

I don’t know where you get your news. But I’m thinking that you are obese beyond belief on your diet of pure propaganda.

The intent section was about the underlying crime. The intent must be there before they could find Trump guilty. They must determine that he took the actions he was accused of with the intent to commit the crimes. Intent.

Motive was not necessary. But intent was required.

 

[noonereal]

DJ hit the steps and used the word rigged five times in four sentences, and I wonder where you get it from.

The word of the lord.

 

[eagle1462010]

Yes but it was escalated to a felony by the secondary crimes. Then it was a felony state charge.

He wasn't charged with the secondary crimes and they don't need to show intent for those secondary crimes.

New York Penal Law 175.10 is about falsifying business records in the first degree. It states that a person is guilty of this crime if they:

• Commit the crime of falsifying business records in the second degree
• Have an intent to defraud, which includes:
  • Intent to commit another crime
  • Intent to aid or conceal the commission of another crime

 

[Lastamender]

Or new evidence came to light and Trump was t president anymore so he could be indicted.

On what grounds?

The grounds are Trump is going to win a fair election hands down.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Bill Clinton was not found guilty of sexual assault.

Don't play that