JoeB131
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 172,577
- 33,257
No, you don't assume anything. Is it okay to assume that Brown stole merchandise ten times before he got into an altercation with officer Wilson? Believe it or not, you are not the only person ignorant of our laws and police procedure. There are a lot of people, especially in the inner-city where a lot of uneducated people reside. A complaint has no merit unless it's investigated and the officer is found to be outside of the law or police procedure which well over 98% of them are not.
I wouldn't care if he shoplifted 10 times. it's just not that serious of an offense.
The problem is that the police investigate themselves, of course they are going to clear themselves 98% of the time. Wow, you like have no logic at all, do you?
Uh, that's what HE claimed, he was responding to the robbery. And then had a causual conversation with the suspects that suddenly and inexplicably erupted into a physical confrontation.. according to Wilson's self-serving statements.Again with the comprehension problems. WTF did I say he was responding to the store robbery? I said he didn't even know about it until he heard the call on the radio while he was with Brown. He didn't confront Brown about the theft, he confronted him about walking in the middle of the street. He told Brown to get out of the street and that's when Brown became confrontational. Officer Wilson didn't change his story.
Here's the real proof of the pudding. He hasn't been re-instated and no other department will hire him.
Furthermore because I always try to teach you something in these matters, police do not use lights and sirens to respond to a simple shoplifting case. Those lights and sirens are used in emergency situations only which shoplifting is not.
BIngo. NOT AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. So why get into a physical confrontation with two suspects?
You mean after the corrupt DA bullied them, they decided not to testify. Much easier to just riot.The stories are reliable as they come with hyperlinks; not that you bothered to look. Most of the witnesses lied about other matters of the situation, one was found to have psychological problems, they had an iPad of the lowlifes talking about concocting the false story, 8 people admitted to lying up front, and the others under questioning were found to be lying or their recount of events didn't match with the evidence.
Can you tell me why it would matter if the suspect was barefoot and unarmed? It had nothing to do with him getting shot to death.
Matters a whole lot... tells me, he wasn't much of a threat. You try running down the street barefoot on hot tarmac.