Aba Incieni
Gold Member
- Dec 13, 2017
- 8,910
- 1,282
- 290
Wow. This NY Times article says $4 billion AND two light-water reactors.Nope, you didn't read the times article.Your position is that Bill Clinton did not give NK $4 billion?That's why he gave them $4 billion. It worked about as well as all dem policies.NK started working on nukes long before Clinton was elected to any office...Do you think if you knew facts you would think differently?
Thank you, Bill Clinton for giving NK $4 billion in 1994...
“This agreement is good for the United States, good for our allies, and good for the safety of the entire world,” said Clinton in 1994. “It’s a crucial step toward drawing North Korea into the global community.”
Bill Clinton Paved the Way for a Nuclear North Korea | LifeZette
He didn't , read the article.
Yes [ ]
No [ ]
BTW, you may as well argue he didn't abuse his authority with an intern in a sideroom off the Oval Office. These are known facts.
Clinton, in Letter, Assures North Koreans on Nuclear Reactors