ozro
Diamond Member
If they want to riot and start the insurrection early it will be leaked.This will be democrat bad news so no leaking will occur
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they want to riot and start the insurrection early it will be leaked.This will be democrat bad news so no leaking will occur
Yeah, we will get right on that!Remove any SCOTUS justice that doesn't.
Which AA pick? The Black, the Hispanic or the Lesbian?I voted 8:1. The affirmative action pick who couldn’t define a woman will dissent.
What judge? The one where he has never been charged with insurrection, much less even tried?Hmm… the judge in his trial ruled it had been proven.
They face a retention election where they have no opponent. Not exactly a tough task if you don't commit a crime. Want to bet how many of the justices on the Colorado Supreme court have not been retained?Yes, in CO, a State Supreme Court judge is initially appointed by the governor when a vacancy occurs, and they are appointed for 2 years, after which, they have to go through a state wide election to hold their seat. All of the CO supreme court judges that made the ruling have been on the bench several years longer than their appointment. No, they aren't unelected, all of them have gone through a state wide election.
When was that trial? I want dates, judges, jurisdiction, etc.Umm…The civil trial where Trump was adjudicated to have engaged in insurrection.
Damn, Lisa. Get your shit together girl.
Since no members of Congress did, who are you charging? My God, you have slipped into the abyss of stupid!The spirit of the law is to keep those who engaged in insurrection or rebellion while serving in elected office from serving in the future. Confederates or otherwise.
The next steps need to be suits against members of Congress who participated as well.
The one who couldn’t define a woman!Which AA pick? The Black, the Hispanic or the Lesbian?
How so? Never mind. You will never answer.Derp…
Article3 holds Trump as constitutionally ineligible.
I'm looking forward to making complete asses out of all the Biden cultists who wet their pants with excitement over this unconstitutional attempt to deprive citizens of their voting rights.
I'll take bets on SCOTUS going:
9-0
8-1 (Jackson, the dumbest of them all dissenting)
7-2 (both Jackson and Sotomayor siding with the Nazis).
Do you GOP people not know 'cause yer always askin'. That tells me you ain't got a clue.The one who couldn’t define a woman!
My point was that all three were AA picks. One is black, another is a Latina, and the last likes other women.The one who couldn’t define a woman!
Got it.My point was that all three were AA picks. One is black, another is a Latina, and the last likes other women.
Wait a sec. Kagan is a lesbian?My point was that all three were AA picks. One is black, another is a Latina, and the last likes other women.
No rule says they gotta be white and male.My point was that all three were AA picks. One is black, another is a Latina, and the last likes other women.
I posted a link to the hearing. Evidence was presented. A determination was made by a judge. A ruling in the Colorado courts.
The trial judge in November determined it was an insurrection. The appeals court upheld that finding. Trumps lawyers argued it wasn’t. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld that finding.
If the courts are not suited for such determinations, who is? The 14th doesn’t say who decides that does it?
There does not have to be a trial.There was no trial, stop lying.
No. You ask stupid questions because you already should know the answer.Who decides then? If not the courts? According to Trump’s attorneys it is the Party who decides. In that case if the Democrats put up a thirty year old naturalized citizen and said he was eligible, there would be nothing anyone could do about it. He would, if elected, be President right?
You didn't know?Wait a sec. Kagan is a lesbian?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.