ozro
Diamond Member
- Feb 21, 2014
- 2,916
- 2,874
So....you expect logic?????? Bless your heart.This one is so cut and dried there is no reason to leak.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So....you expect logic?????? Bless your heart.This one is so cut and dried there is no reason to leak.
I just told you, tard.So you have no idea then?
So....you expect logic?????? Bless your heart.
What if people wanted to vote for Taylor Swift but she isn’t 35 yet?It will.
Every time the country sees you deny people the right to vote for who they want, Trump gets stronger.
What if people wanted to vote for Taylor Swift but she isn’t 35 yet?
That’s a proven fact. She doesn’t qualify.What if people wanted to vote for Taylor Swift but she isn’t 35 yet?
And that would just as wrong. SCOTUS better nip this insanity in the bud quickly and forever.It's not just woke states who want to do the same thing. Republicans want to kick Biden off the ballot. That's a stronger case due to the violations of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution.
Is it?That's a really stupid question.
Exactly.That’s a proven fact. She doesn’t qualify.
Is it?
The obvious answer is to tell them to pound sand because she isn’t constitutionally eligible.
![]()
tard is being kind!!! that motherfucker is looking at tard in the rear view mirror.I just told you, tard.
I bet that's the last thing they wanna do. They probably look real hard for a reason to kick that thing back to Colorado over some procedural issue.And that would just as wrong. SCOTUS better nip this insanity in the bud quickly and forever.
No it would not be wrong because Biden did violate the constitution. And he does so every day.And that would just as wrong. SCOTUS better nip this insanity in the bud quickly and forever.
Derp…And?
How does that settle anything?I bet that's the last thing they wanna do. They probably look real hard for a reason to kick that thing back to Colorado over some procedural issue.
Doesn't apply to Trump. He is 35+ and there’s nothing else about him that makes him ineligible.Exactly.
Constitutionally ineligible.
Get it now?
I'm looking forward to making complete asses out of all the Biden cultists who wet their pants with excitement over this unconstitutional attempt to deprive citizens of their voting rights.
I'll take bets on SCOTUS going:
9-0
8-1 (Jackson, the dumbest of them all dissenting)
7-2 (both Jackson and Sotomayor siding with the Nazis).
Obviously it does as you’re eager to see SCOTUS rule on it.Doesn't apply to Trump. He is 35+ and there’s nothing else about him that makes him ineligible.
The SCOTUS better rule soon and stop all this liberal nonsense.
Derp…
Article3 holds Trump as constitutionally ineligible.