Pop23
Gold Member
- Mar 28, 2013
- 26,685
- 4,383
The 'implications' of Baker v. Nelson legalized same sex marriage? If no, then you're clearly not following what's being discussed.
And same sex marriage has been legal in the US for 10 years. Yet nothing you've claimed must happen....did happen.
How do you explain your perfect record of failure?
And in other countries much longer. Which countries allow gays to marry each other and ALSO perform polygamist marriages?
None? You don't say. Such a slippery slope!
How many of those have a 14th amendment like ours?
How many have folks such as yourself that don't have the slightest clue what they're talking about?
Remember, we've had the 14th amendement for the decade since we first started legalizing same sex marriage. And yet no where, in no court, has the law recognized your claims. No court has. And none of what you predicted would happen......actually happened.
How do you explain the vast chasm between what you *assumed* was going to happen. And what actually did?
The 14th amendment was ratified in 1868.
That's one looooong friggin decade!
Same sex marriage was first legalized in 1868? You seem confused.
Same sex marriage was first legalized in the US in 2004....in Massechusettes. Yet since that time, nothing you predicted would occur actually happened. Despite the fact that we've had the 14th amendment the entire time.
So again, how do you explain the utter and comic failure of your *every* prediction, with absolutely nothing you insisted must happen actually happening or being recognized as valid by any court?
Sorry Skylar, it wasn't federally recognized