Fox News Enjoying Resurgence Amid AP/Rosen Phone Records Scandal

[LoneLaugher]

Seems a fair question to ask as far as I'm concerned since Libs think Hannity and O'Reilly's shows are news shows.

What?

Libs think Hannity and O'Reilly are news shows?

Twisted, pained logic.

 

[TemplarKormac]

TK,

Please, take your chin off of my ball sack. I don't consider you an equal. Your comments are growing lamer by the day.

What fucking crime was committed?

When has a liberal ever said that John Stewart produces a news show?

Please.....eat shit.

Ahahaha! Look it up, nitwit! Closed Craption made a thread about it a few weeks ago.

 

[Lakhota]

Fox News is a low-information bottom feeder.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Fox News is a low-information bottom feeder.

Lol. Is that all you came here to say?

 

[blackhawk]

FOX News is number 1 in the cable ratings and has been for a long time and when you have big stories or breaking news the cable networks are where people tend go to and again FOX tends to be the number 1 network people go for news in these situations last when ever there is a poll asking which news network do you trust the most FOX tends to come out on top of those so it seems there doing more than just appealing to the partisan right as their critics like to claim.

Considering that both FAUX Nooze and CNN got it wrong on major stories TWICE, I'm wondering why anyone would consider them to be good news sources on breaking news?

Remember the screw up when both FAUX and CNN were screaming that the SC found Obamacare to be unconstitutional?

Or................how about a couple of days after the Boston Marathon bombing when both FAUX and CNN were reporting that "two brown skinned males had been taken into custody", when in fact no such thing had happened, and it wasn't until the following night that one of the bombers was killed in a shootout, and the following day they took the second into custody?

Is that how FAUX "gets it right" and is "most trusted"?

So can you name any news network that never makes mistakes from time to time? FOX and CNN since you decided to trash them as well get it right far more than they get it wrong I notice you didn't mention MSNBC and there multiple tape editing mistakes and I'm being generous calling those mistakes.

 

[blackhawk]

Fox News is a low-information bottom feeder.

That coming from a bottom feeder means so little.

 

[westwall]

Fox News is a low-information bottom feeder.

So, that makes you the sewer pump?

 

[aaronleland]

High ratings doesn't equate to good journalism. The only times I watch MSNBC or Fox is for entertainment only. Their purpose is to get partisan retards foaming at the mouths, and to entertain the rest of us at partisan retards foaming at the mouths.

 

[ABikerSailor]

FOX News is number 1 in the cable ratings and has been for a long time and when you have big stories or breaking news the cable networks are where people tend go to and again FOX tends to be the number 1 network people go for news in these situations last when ever there is a poll asking which news network do you trust the most FOX tends to come out on top of those so it seems there doing more than just appealing to the partisan right as their critics like to claim.

Considering that both FAUX Nooze and CNN got it wrong on major stories TWICE, I'm wondering why anyone would consider them to be good news sources on breaking news?

Remember the screw up when both FAUX and CNN were screaming that the SC found Obamacare to be unconstitutional?

Or................how about a couple of days after the Boston Marathon bombing when both FAUX and CNN were reporting that "two brown skinned males had been taken into custody", when in fact no such thing had happened, and it wasn't until the following night that one of the bombers was killed in a shootout, and the following day they took the second into custody?

Is that how FAUX "gets it right" and is "most trusted"?

So can you name any news network that never makes mistakes from time to time? FOX and CNN since you decided to trash them as well get it right far more than they get it wrong I notice you didn't mention MSNBC and there multiple tape editing mistakes and I'm being generous calling those mistakes.

You know................even MSNBC makes mistakes in their reporting, but they have this habit of correcting it whenever they see they are wrong.

I've yet to hear FAUX Nooze or CNN broadcast a retraction of what they'd said about either subject I've just brought up.

Interestingly enough, MSNBC were smart enough to get the real information before broadcasting it to the public, and kept the story true.

What did FAUX Nooze or CNN do? They just muddied the waters.

 

[FJO]

Since when does Fox news have higher ratings than network news?

Since 2001?

2012 Ratings: Fox News Number One For 11 Straight Years - TVNewser

They also only have 425,000 out of 2.5 million in the target demo(25-54). When the geezers start dying off fox news numbers will start to tumble, unless magically all of those people in the target demo become Fox viewers when they reach 54.

Foolish young socialist Democrat whipper snappers in the target age group (those with any brains, anyways) eventually become older and wiser and capitalistic Republican 'geezers'.

Except the likes of you for the obvious stated reason.

 

[Sallow]

It's quite obvious that crime doesn't pay. Journalists should be protected from government overreach. Looks like America agrees.

Obama Scandals Bring MSNBC 7-Year Low While Fox News Rises - Deadline.com

What crimes were committed?

Giving confidential information to non governmental entities. And that's just for starters. Making false statements, etc.

Hence grabbing the emails.

Man.

 

[Sallow]

Don't feign ignorance, you liberal tool.

What crimes were committed?

Stop feigning ignorance. If you are too damned stupid to figure it out for yourself, you need professional help.

There were no crimes.

The Patriot Act allows the government to basically snoop anywhere it wants.

And the lack of strong whistle blower laws enforces that.

 

[Redfish]

What crimes were committed?

Stop feigning ignorance. If you are too damned stupid to figure it out for yourself, you need professional help.

There were no crimes.

The Patriot Act allows the government to basically snoop anywhere it wants.

And the lack of strong whistle blower laws enforces that.

The patriot act allows govt to tap the communications of known or suspected terrorists. Are you claiming that the govt thought Rosen was a terrorist?

This was a political vendetta, the evidence coming out proves it. Dictators like obama hate any media that puts out the truth about them.

 

[Sallow]

Stop feigning ignorance. If you are too damned stupid to figure it out for yourself, you need professional help.

There were no crimes.

The Patriot Act allows the government to basically snoop anywhere it wants.

And the lack of strong whistle blower laws enforces that.

The patriot act allows govt to tap the communications of known or suspected terrorists. Are you claiming that the govt thought Rosen was a terrorist?

This was a political vendetta, the evidence coming out proves it. Dictators like obama hate any media that puts out the truth about them.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

News organizations were the first to lambast the act, because they deal with ALOT of pretty shady characters. CNN was one of the first to interview Osama Bin Laden, who essentially declared war on the US on prime time. Had their been a patriot act back then many reporters might have wound up in the clink.

No outrage then.

None.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

[Redfish]

There were no crimes.

The Patriot Act allows the government to basically snoop anywhere it wants.

And the lack of strong whistle blower laws enforces that.

The patriot act allows govt to tap the communications of known or suspected terrorists. Are you claiming that the govt thought Rosen was a terrorist?

This was a political vendetta, the evidence coming out proves it. Dictators like obama hate any media that puts out the truth about them.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

News organizations were the first to lambast the act, because they deal with ALOT of pretty shady characters. CNN was one of the first to interview Osama Bin Laden, who essentially declared war on the US on prime time. Had their been a patriot act back then many reporters might have wound up in the clink.

No outrage then.

None.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/politics/16program.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

you post erroneous bullshit and then quote a bullshit left wing newspaper to verify your bullshit.

 

[JoeNormal]

"Resurgence"? Fox has been #1 for the last decade.

If you read the article, it was down last year in viewership. Still #1, but down in viewership. I call that a resurgence. Whatever the case may be, when one news channel continuously outperforms six, you know the liberal MSM is trash. Title of OP changed to encourage clarity.

Since when does Fox news have higher ratings than network news?

Since never. Here are the numbers:

NBC 7,475,000
ABC 6,668,000
CBS 5,787,000
FOX 2,404,000

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/category/evening-news-ratings
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/05/24/cable-news-ratings-for-thursday-may-23-2013/184237/

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Don't feign ignorance, you liberal tool.

What crimes were committed?

Stop feigning ignorance. If you are too damned stupid to figure it out for yourself, you need professional help.

Can you tell me what crimes were committed?

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

What crimes were committed?

Answer the question.

Already been answered, s0n.

I didn't hear the answer. What crimes were committed?

 

[Ava]

It's quite obvious that crime doesn't pay. Journalists should be protected from government overreach. Looks like America agrees.

Obama Scandals Bring MSNBC 7-Year Low While Fox News Rises - Deadline.com

What crimes were committed?

Giving confidential information to non governmental entities. And that's just for starters. Making false statements, etc.

And now we have the DOJ investigating the DOJ.

 

[RandallFlagg]

What crimes were committed?

Giving confidential information to non governmental entities. And that's just for starters. Making false statements, etc.

And now we have the DOJ investigating the DOJ.

It now appears that Steadman Holder lied to Congress with his testimony. It has been decided. Holder will be the "sacrificial lamb" to fall on his sword for Barry.

Just a matter of time. Lois Lerner will fall on her sword (and sink into the sunset with millions of taxpayer dollars) and Holder will do the same...


"My life for you! My life for you!!" - Trashcan man Stephen King's "The Stand"