depotoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
Everyone has an agenda. Let's look at the pros and cons and let's see if it's important
Pro: reduce pollution, increase quality of life, cleaner water and cleaner air
Cons: it's gonna cost a lot of money
If you take out any talk of hidden agendas (or guessing as it's known) the pros outweigh the cons. I understand it's going to cost a lot but I think the cost of doing nothing would cost more, not only in money.
speaking of increasing quality of life, guess you failed to hear those bulbs that have mercury are creating a potential environmental nightmare, huh?
Public, agencies ill-informed of risks
As long as the mercury is contained in the bulb, CFLs are perfectly safe. But eventually, any bulbs even CFLs break or burn out, and most consumers simply throw them out in the trash, said Ellen Silbergeld, a professor of environmental health sciences at Johns Hopkins University and editor of the journal Environmental Research.
This is an enormous amount of mercury thats going to enter the waste stream at present with no preparation for it, she said.
Manufacturers and the EPA say broken CFLs should be handled carefully and recycled to limit dangerous vapors and the spread of mercury dust. But guidelines for how to do that can be difficult to find, as Brandy Bridges of Ellsworth, Maine, discovered.
Shining a light on fluorescent bulbs - US news - Environment | NBC News