France's Strict Gun Laws Did NOTHING to Stop Jihadist Terrorist Attacks

[Mudda]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

That figure is pure propaganda. I've already posted the evidence in other threads.

The Media’s Inflated ‘Mass Shootings’ Count Is Wildly Misleading , by Ian Tuttle, National Review

You don't have to like it, but you could try to suck it up, crybaby.

 

[Mudda]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

Leave it to a LWNJ to just make up facts and figures out of thin air with no links or evidence, then smugly declare victory.

Of course, Zander... you are correct.

"More than 40 percent of all 2015’s mass shootings didn’t kill anybody. Another 104, just under 30 percent, had a single fatality, which means more than two-thirds of all “mass shootings” aren’t even multi-homicide events.

Of the 355 “mass shootings” noted by the Post, only 40 of them (about 11 percent) meet the threshold of a “mass murder” as defined by the FBI, meaning there were at least four fatalities. But even these weren’t all mass shootings in the conventional sense. As pointed out by the Washington Free Beacon, many of them were insteadgrisly murder-suicides, gangland massacres, or robberies, eliminating at least 15 more “mass shootings” from the list."
355?! Why This Number Is Meaningless When It Comes To Mass Shootings

If a bunch of gang members start shooting up another gang, they kill two, but the other gang returns fire and kills two of the instigators, that counts as a "mass shooting" according to the definition used by the propaganda web site where dumbass got his bogus statistic.

The Media’s Inflated ‘Mass Shootings’ Count Is Wildly Misleading , by Ian Tuttle, National Review

If 4 people are shot dead, that's a mass shooting.

 

[Mudda]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

More people have been killed or injured in mass shootings in France in 2015 alone than were in the USA over the last 7 years combined, how's that for a bitch slapping. Oh that's going to leave a mark.

Stop listening to your dog.

 

[Desperado]

Strict Gun Laws do nothing but stop law abiding citizens from protecting themselves.
Successful gun control is simply defined as the ability to hit your target>

 

[Slyhunter]

One of our resident liberals here is saying that to combat terrorism they would institute universal background checks, limit magazine capacities, and ban assault weapons. Well, folks, we just had two horrible jihadist terrorist attacks with automatic weapons in a country where the gun laws are much tougher than that: France.

All automatic weapons are illegal in France, with no exceptions. Ownership of semi-auto weapons is heavily restricted, requiring, among other things, a background check and a license. Handguns are virtually impossible to own. Ammo is heavily regulated, and gun owners are only allowed to possess a small number of bullets. To buy a gun, you must apply for a permit and must provide a valid reason for wanting to own a gun. In fact, France has no personal right to own firearms in its constitution. (And, FYI, France has for years been run by politicians who would be viewed as liberal or very liberal by American standards.)

What are the liberal "solutions" for preventing jihadist terrorism? Let's see:

* Severely restrict (if not end) our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, even though such an approach just failed miserably in France. The jihadists' weapons included AK-47 rifles, which can fire in both semi-automatic and automatic mode--in other words, with one flick of the selector switch, the AK-47 becomes a machine gun.

* Allow into the country 10,000 more people from the one and only demographic group that has provided all the recruits for jihadist terrorism (that would be Muslims), even though it's now painfully obvious that our supposedly "extensive and comprehensive" vetting system is badly flawed, and even though several intelligence officials have now said that we cannot properly screen the Syrian refugees.

* Refuse to take any responsibility for the disastrous, tragically misguided decision of Farook's neighbors who had suspicions about him and his wife but who decided not to report their suspicions to authorities for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

You would think that after San Bernardino, liberals would say, "Obviously, from now on, if you see Muslims, or people who you think are Muslims, doing things that strike you as suspicious or that just seem odd for your neighborhood or area, err on the side of caution and say something to authorities."

* Oppose efforts to seal the border or to substantially improve border security (just look at the debates and votes in Congress on border security issues, or visit liberal websites that discuss immigration policy), even though we have had a rash of cases of Muslims trying to enter the country with fake passports.

* Support sanctuary cities, where officials purposely refuse to cooperate with law enforcement officials who are trying to enforce our immigration laws.

* Refuse to even support laws that say that you will be deported if you're in the country illegally and you commit a violent crime. (No kidding. Democrats recently blocked Kate's Law in the Senate, which would have required the deportation of any illegal alien who committed a violent crime.)

* Refuse to even call Islamic terrorism Islamic terrorism and engage in ridiculous comparisons to nominally "Christian" lone-nut gunmen as a way to avoid admitting the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a country has, the greater its chances of being attacked. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no worldwide Christian terrorist movement that is trying to overthrow democratic governments, that is beheading people, that is using drug money to help fund its operations, that is imposing Sharia law, that is preventing girls from attending school, that blows up schools if girls don't stop attending them, that is engaging in the wide-scale trafficking of women, that denies the Holocaust, that vows to destroy Israel, and that has killed thousand of Americans.

Mon Dieu! A Review of French Gun Laws - The Truth About Guns

Paris attacks: How were Isis terrorists able to obtain Kalashnikov AK-47 assault rifles?

Guns in France — Firearms, gun law and gun control

Blog: American left demands strict gun control laws (like France!) in the wake of San Bernardino shootings

Did France's Strict Gun Control Contribute to the Paris Bloodbath?

So what will stop the terrorist attacks?

Nothing will stop all of them, that's why they work.
REfusing to bow down to their demands, retribution when/where able, will reduce them.
There will always be individuals willing to sell their lives for an ideal.

 

[bripat9643]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

That figure is pure propaganda. I've already posted the evidence in other threads.

The Media’s Inflated ‘Mass Shootings’ Count Is Wildly Misleading , by Ian Tuttle, National Review

You don't have to like it, but you could try to suck it up, crybaby.

Pointing out the fact that you're a lying hosebag is "crying?" I think libs have a grab bag of stock answers and they just pick one at random, whether it has anything to do with the subject under discussion or not.

 

[2aguy]

One of our resident liberals here is saying that to combat terrorism they would institute universal background checks, limit magazine capacities, and ban assault weapons. Well, folks, we just had two horrible jihadist terrorist attacks with automatic weapons in a country where the gun laws are much tougher than that: France.

All automatic weapons are illegal in France, with no exceptions. Ownership of semi-auto weapons is heavily restricted, requiring, among other things, a background check and a license. Handguns are virtually impossible to own. Ammo is heavily regulated, and gun owners are only allowed to possess a small number of bullets. To buy a gun, you must apply for a permit and must provide a valid reason for wanting to own a gun. In fact, France has no personal right to own firearms in its constitution. (And, FYI, France has for years been run by politicians who would be viewed as liberal or very liberal by American standards.)

What are the liberal "solutions" for preventing jihadist terrorism? Let's see:

* Severely restrict (if not end) our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, even though such an approach just failed miserably in France. The jihadists' weapons included AK-47 rifles, which can fire in both semi-automatic and automatic mode--in other words, with one flick of the selector switch, the AK-47 becomes a machine gun.

* Allow into the country 10,000 more people from the one and only demographic group that has provided all the recruits for jihadist terrorism (that would be Muslims), even though it's now painfully obvious that our supposedly "extensive and comprehensive" vetting system is badly flawed, and even though several intelligence officials have now said that we cannot properly screen the Syrian refugees.

* Refuse to take any responsibility for the disastrous, tragically misguided decision of Farook's neighbors who had suspicions about him and his wife but who decided not to report their suspicions to authorities for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

You would think that after San Bernardino, liberals would say, "Obviously, from now on, if you see Muslims, or people who you think are Muslims, doing things that strike you as suspicious or that just seem odd for your neighborhood or area, err on the side of caution and say something to authorities."

* Oppose efforts to seal the border or to substantially improve border security (just look at the debates and votes in Congress on border security issues, or visit liberal websites that discuss immigration policy), even though we have had a rash of cases of Muslims trying to enter the country with fake passports.

* Support sanctuary cities, where officials purposely refuse to cooperate with law enforcement officials who are trying to enforce our immigration laws.

* Refuse to even support laws that say that you will be deported if you're in the country illegally and you commit a violent crime. (No kidding. Democrats recently blocked Kate's Law in the Senate, which would have required the deportation of any illegal alien who committed a violent crime.)

* Refuse to even call Islamic terrorism Islamic terrorism and engage in ridiculous comparisons to nominally "Christian" lone-nut gunmen as a way to avoid admitting the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a country has, the greater its chances of being attacked. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no worldwide Christian terrorist movement that is trying to overthrow democratic governments, that is beheading people, that is using drug money to help fund its operations, that is imposing Sharia law, that is preventing girls from attending school, that blows up schools if girls don't stop attending them, that is engaging in the wide-scale trafficking of women, that denies the Holocaust, that vows to destroy Israel, and that has killed thousand of Americans.

Mon Dieu! A Review of French Gun Laws - The Truth About Guns

Paris attacks: How were Isis terrorists able to obtain Kalashnikov AK-47 assault rifles?

Guns in France — Firearms, gun law and gun control

Blog: American left demands strict gun control laws (like France!) in the wake of San Bernardino shootings

Did France's Strict Gun Control Contribute to the Paris Bloodbath?

Don't forget the attack on the Jewish synogogue in France...that went unnoticed here several years ago....and the recent gunman on the train from Belgium....stopped by our 3 Americans who took action....

 

[bripat9643]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

Leave it to a LWNJ to just make up facts and figures out of thin air with no links or evidence, then smugly declare victory.

Of course, Zander... you are correct.

"More than 40 percent of all 2015’s mass shootings didn’t kill anybody. Another 104, just under 30 percent, had a single fatality, which means more than two-thirds of all “mass shootings” aren’t even multi-homicide events.

Of the 355 “mass shootings” noted by the Post, only 40 of them (about 11 percent) meet the threshold of a “mass murder” as defined by the FBI, meaning there were at least four fatalities. But even these weren’t all mass shootings in the conventional sense. As pointed out by the Washington Free Beacon, many of them were insteadgrisly murder-suicides, gangland massacres, or robberies, eliminating at least 15 more “mass shootings” from the list."
355?! Why This Number Is Meaningless When It Comes To Mass Shootings

If a bunch of gang members start shooting up another gang, they kill two, but the other gang returns fire and kills two of the instigators, that counts as a "mass shooting" according to the definition used by the propaganda web site where dumbass got his bogus statistic.

The Media’s Inflated ‘Mass Shootings’ Count Is Wildly Misleading , by Ian Tuttle, National Review

If 4 people are shot dead, that's a mass shooting.

I just pointed out an example of where it isn't, moron. If four men try to rob a bank, and the police shoot them all dead, is that a mass shooting?

You're too stupid for words to describe. You got called on your sleazy propaganda, and now you're trying to salvage it.

No one is buyng it.

 

[2aguy]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

That is a lie....a complete lie....shooting tracker...the gun grabber site that made that lie...includes eveything as a mass shooting...check out their list.......in one case gang members were giving a party for one of their thugs going to jail....they got drunk, high and started shooting each other over a dice game....that is not a mass shooting as people know it...I have been posting about this lie all week.....

 

[2aguy]

One of our resident liberals here is saying that to combat terrorism they would institute universal background checks, limit magazine capacities, and ban assault weapons. Well, folks, we just had two horrible jihadist terrorist attacks with automatic weapons in a country where the gun laws are much tougher than that: France.

All automatic weapons are illegal in France, with no exceptions. Ownership of semi-auto weapons is heavily restricted, requiring, among other things, a background check and a license. Handguns are virtually impossible to own. Ammo is heavily regulated, and gun owners are only allowed to possess a small number of bullets. To buy a gun, you must apply for a permit and must provide a valid reason for wanting to own a gun. In fact, France has no personal right to own firearms in its constitution. (And, FYI, France has for years been run by politicians who would be viewed as liberal or very liberal by American standards.)

What are the liberal "solutions" for preventing jihadist terrorism? Let's see:

* Severely restrict (if not end) our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, even though such an approach just failed miserably in France. The jihadists' weapons included AK-47 rifles, which can fire in both semi-automatic and automatic mode--in other words, with one flick of the selector switch, the AK-47 becomes a machine gun.

* Allow into the country 10,000 more people from the one and only demographic group that has provided all the recruits for jihadist terrorism (that would be Muslims), even though it's now painfully obvious that our supposedly "extensive and comprehensive" vetting system is badly flawed, and even though several intelligence officials have now said that we cannot properly screen the Syrian refugees.

* Refuse to take any responsibility for the disastrous, tragically misguided decision of Farook's neighbors who had suspicions about him and his wife but who decided not to report their suspicions to authorities for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

You would think that after San Bernardino, liberals would say, "Obviously, from now on, if you see Muslims, or people who you think are Muslims, doing things that strike you as suspicious or that just seem odd for your neighborhood or area, err on the side of caution and say something to authorities."

* Oppose efforts to seal the border or to substantially improve border security (just look at the debates and votes in Congress on border security issues, or visit liberal websites that discuss immigration policy), even though we have had a rash of cases of Muslims trying to enter the country with fake passports.

* Support sanctuary cities, where officials purposely refuse to cooperate with law enforcement officials who are trying to enforce our immigration laws.

* Refuse to even support laws that say that you will be deported if you're in the country illegally and you commit a violent crime. (No kidding. Democrats recently blocked Kate's Law in the Senate, which would have required the deportation of any illegal alien who committed a violent crime.)

* Refuse to even call Islamic terrorism Islamic terrorism and engage in ridiculous comparisons to nominally "Christian" lone-nut gunmen as a way to avoid admitting the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a country has, the greater its chances of being attacked. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no worldwide Christian terrorist movement that is trying to overthrow democratic governments, that is beheading people, that is using drug money to help fund its operations, that is imposing Sharia law, that is preventing girls from attending school, that blows up schools if girls don't stop attending them, that is engaging in the wide-scale trafficking of women, that denies the Holocaust, that vows to destroy Israel, and that has killed thousand of Americans.

Mon Dieu! A Review of French Gun Laws - The Truth About Guns

Paris attacks: How were Isis terrorists able to obtain Kalashnikov AK-47 assault rifles?

Guns in France — Firearms, gun law and gun control

Blog: American left demands strict gun control laws (like France!) in the wake of San Bernardino shootings

Did France's Strict Gun Control Contribute to the Paris Bloodbath?

So what will stop the terrorist attacks?

Good intelligence........if monitoring mosques that are known to sympathize with jihadism.........if you see suspicious behavior report it...even if it is a kid making a replica clock bomb....and stop making fun of people who report things....you guys silenced that woman who knew something bad was going on...that is on you....

 

[NYcarbineer]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

That is a lie....a complete lie....shooting tracker...the gun grabber site that made that lie...includes eveything as a mass shooting...check out their list.......in one case gang members were giving a party for one of their thugs going to jail....they got drunk, high and started shooting each other over a dice game....that is not a mass shooting as people know it...I have been posting about this lie all week.....

Yes, we know, you nuts jiggered the incident count around until you got the numbers you wanted.

 

[BluesLegend]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

More people have been killed or injured in mass shootings in France in 2015 alone than were in the USA over the last 7 years combined, how's that for a bitch slapping. Oh that's going to leave a mark.

Stop listening to your dog.

Denial, the last gasps of liberalisms demise.

 

[2aguy]

One of our resident liberals here is saying that to combat terrorism they would institute universal background checks, limit magazine capacities, and ban assault weapons. Well, folks, we just had two horrible jihadist terrorist attacks with automatic weapons in a country where the gun laws are much tougher than that: France.

All automatic weapons are illegal in France, with no exceptions. Ownership of semi-auto weapons is heavily restricted, requiring, among other things, a background check and a license. Handguns are virtually impossible to own. Ammo is heavily regulated, and gun owners are only allowed to possess a small number of bullets. To buy a gun, you must apply for a permit and must provide a valid reason for wanting to own a gun. In fact, France has no personal right to own firearms in its constitution. (And, FYI, France has for years been run by politicians who would be viewed as liberal or very liberal by American standards.)

What are the liberal "solutions" for preventing jihadist terrorism? Let's see:

* Severely restrict (if not end) our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, even though such an approach just failed miserably in France. The jihadists' weapons included AK-47 rifles, which can fire in both semi-automatic and automatic mode--in other words, with one flick of the selector switch, the AK-47 becomes a machine gun.

* Allow into the country 10,000 more people from the one and only demographic group that has provided all the recruits for jihadist terrorism (that would be Muslims), even though it's now painfully obvious that our supposedly "extensive and comprehensive" vetting system is badly flawed, and even though several intelligence officials have now said that we cannot properly screen the Syrian refugees.

* Refuse to take any responsibility for the disastrous, tragically misguided decision of Farook's neighbors who had suspicions about him and his wife but who decided not to report their suspicions to authorities for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

You would think that after San Bernardino, liberals would say, "Obviously, from now on, if you see Muslims, or people who you think are Muslims, doing things that strike you as suspicious or that just seem odd for your neighborhood or area, err on the side of caution and say something to authorities."

* Oppose efforts to seal the border or to substantially improve border security (just look at the debates and votes in Congress on border security issues, or visit liberal websites that discuss immigration policy), even though we have had a rash of cases of Muslims trying to enter the country with fake passports.

* Support sanctuary cities, where officials purposely refuse to cooperate with law enforcement officials who are trying to enforce our immigration laws.

* Refuse to even support laws that say that you will be deported if you're in the country illegally and you commit a violent crime. (No kidding. Democrats recently blocked Kate's Law in the Senate, which would have required the deportation of any illegal alien who committed a violent crime.)

* Refuse to even call Islamic terrorism Islamic terrorism and engage in ridiculous comparisons to nominally "Christian" lone-nut gunmen as a way to avoid admitting the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a country has, the greater its chances of being attacked. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no worldwide Christian terrorist movement that is trying to overthrow democratic governments, that is beheading people, that is using drug money to help fund its operations, that is imposing Sharia law, that is preventing girls from attending school, that blows up schools if girls don't stop attending them, that is engaging in the wide-scale trafficking of women, that denies the Holocaust, that vows to destroy Israel, and that has killed thousand of Americans.

Mon Dieu! A Review of French Gun Laws - The Truth About Guns

Paris attacks: How were Isis terrorists able to obtain Kalashnikov AK-47 assault rifles?

Guns in France — Firearms, gun law and gun control

Blog: American left demands strict gun control laws (like France!) in the wake of San Bernardino shootings

Did France's Strict Gun Control Contribute to the Paris Bloodbath?

So what will stop the terrorist attacks?

Humm, well, how about we start by not bringing over 10,000 more people from the one and only demographic group that has produced all the jihadists? Why has Japan had no jihadist terrorist attacks?

How about we advise all citizens that, for heaven's sake, the next time they see Muslims doing things in their neighborhoods that strike them as odd or suspicious, say something?

How about we shut down any mosque that has been caught teaching jihad and deport its leaders and any mosque members who participated in the teaching?

How about we track anyone who visits or posts in Internet forums that even hint at sympathy for jihadism?

How about we allow our intel assets to once again monitor the metadata of Internet comms for indications of potential terrorist planning or associations?

These would be some solid, sane steps to try to prevent further attacks.

Japan has completely refused to take in any muslims...they will not allow it, and they proudly state it....those people they say will not fit into Japanese society...so they don't let them in.........and not one muslim terrorist attack in Japan...

 

[NYcarbineer]

One of our resident liberals here is saying that to combat terrorism they would institute universal background checks, limit magazine capacities, and ban assault weapons. Well, folks, we just had two horrible jihadist terrorist attacks with automatic weapons in a country where the gun laws are much tougher than that: France.

All automatic weapons are illegal in France, with no exceptions. Ownership of semi-auto weapons is heavily restricted, requiring, among other things, a background check and a license. Handguns are virtually impossible to own. Ammo is heavily regulated, and gun owners are only allowed to possess a small number of bullets. To buy a gun, you must apply for a permit and must provide a valid reason for wanting to own a gun. In fact, France has no personal right to own firearms in its constitution. (And, FYI, France has for years been run by politicians who would be viewed as liberal or very liberal by American standards.)

What are the liberal "solutions" for preventing jihadist terrorism? Let's see:

* Severely restrict (if not end) our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms, even though such an approach just failed miserably in France. The jihadists' weapons included AK-47 rifles, which can fire in both semi-automatic and automatic mode--in other words, with one flick of the selector switch, the AK-47 becomes a machine gun.

* Allow into the country 10,000 more people from the one and only demographic group that has provided all the recruits for jihadist terrorism (that would be Muslims), even though it's now painfully obvious that our supposedly "extensive and comprehensive" vetting system is badly flawed, and even though several intelligence officials have now said that we cannot properly screen the Syrian refugees.

* Refuse to take any responsibility for the disastrous, tragically misguided decision of Farook's neighbors who had suspicions about him and his wife but who decided not to report their suspicions to authorities for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

You would think that after San Bernardino, liberals would say, "Obviously, from now on, if you see Muslims, or people who you think are Muslims, doing things that strike you as suspicious or that just seem odd for your neighborhood or area, err on the side of caution and say something to authorities."

* Oppose efforts to seal the border or to substantially improve border security (just look at the debates and votes in Congress on border security issues, or visit liberal websites that discuss immigration policy), even though we have had a rash of cases of Muslims trying to enter the country with fake passports.

* Support sanctuary cities, where officials purposely refuse to cooperate with law enforcement officials who are trying to enforce our immigration laws.

* Refuse to even support laws that say that you will be deported if you're in the country illegally and you commit a violent crime. (No kidding. Democrats recently blocked Kate's Law in the Senate, which would have required the deportation of any illegal alien who committed a violent crime.)

* Refuse to even call Islamic terrorism Islamic terrorism and engage in ridiculous comparisons to nominally "Christian" lone-nut gunmen as a way to avoid admitting the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a country has, the greater its chances of being attacked. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no worldwide Christian terrorist movement that is trying to overthrow democratic governments, that is beheading people, that is using drug money to help fund its operations, that is imposing Sharia law, that is preventing girls from attending school, that blows up schools if girls don't stop attending them, that is engaging in the wide-scale trafficking of women, that denies the Holocaust, that vows to destroy Israel, and that has killed thousand of Americans.

Mon Dieu! A Review of French Gun Laws - The Truth About Guns

Paris attacks: How were Isis terrorists able to obtain Kalashnikov AK-47 assault rifles?

Guns in France — Firearms, gun law and gun control

Blog: American left demands strict gun control laws (like France!) in the wake of San Bernardino shootings

Did France's Strict Gun Control Contribute to the Paris Bloodbath?

So what will stop the terrorist attacks?

Good intelligence........if monitoring mosques that are known to sympathize with jihadism.........if you see suspicious behavior report it...even if it is a kid making a replica clock bomb....and stop making fun of people who report things....you guys silenced that woman who knew something bad was going on...that is on you....

Don't lie about what I've done. Find something else to be an asshole about.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

More people have been killed or injured in mass shootings in France in 2015 alone than were in the USA over the last 7 years combined, how's that for a bitch slapping. Oh that's going to leave a mark.

Stop listening to your dog.

Denial, the last gasps of liberalisms demise.

Liberalism's demise? Liberalism never stops advancing.

 

[2aguy]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

That is a lie....a complete lie....shooting tracker...the gun grabber site that made that lie...includes eveything as a mass shooting...check out their list.......in one case gang members were giving a party for one of their thugs going to jail....they got drunk, high and started shooting each other over a dice game....that is not a mass shooting as people know it...I have been posting about this lie all week.....

Yes, we know, you nuts jiggered the incident count around until you got the numbers you wanted.

Nope.....gang bangers at a party shooting each other is not a mass shooting by anyone's understanding of a mass shooting.....and that is most of that list at shooting tracker...

That is why we don't trust anti gunners.....they lie all the time and they lie without hesitation and they do it proudly.....

 

[2aguy]

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

More people have been killed or injured in mass shootings in France in 2015 alone than were in the USA over the last 7 years combined, how's that for a bitch slapping. Oh that's going to leave a mark.

Stop listening to your dog.

Denial, the last gasps of liberalisms demise.

Liberalism's demise? Liberalism never stops advancing.

yes...it is like gangrene.....

 

[2aguy]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

Yeah, I have "no real comeback" to your laughable definition of "mass shooting" and then your comparison of that to the San Bernardino jihadist terrorist attack that killed 14 people.

How many of those other "mass shootings" involved jihadists who were in contact with foreign jihadists? How many of those other "mass shootings" involved people who pledged allegiance to a worldwide radical Muslim movement that is avowedly trying to kill non-Muslims and moderate Muslims, that controls a huge area of land in the Middle East, that opposes girls going to school, that has been beheading people, and that is imposing Sharia law wherever it can?

Domestic terrorism is what the "other" shootings are, facilitated by the domestic terrorist organization the NRA. Now maybe you can wrap you tiny brain around what I said.

The NRA has nothing to do with crime or terrorism......you left wing nuts hate it because it protects our right to defend ourselves from you.........

 

[NYcarbineer]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

That is a lie....a complete lie....shooting tracker...the gun grabber site that made that lie...includes eveything as a mass shooting...check out their list.......in one case gang members were giving a party for one of their thugs going to jail....they got drunk, high and started shooting each other over a dice game....that is not a mass shooting as people know it...I have been posting about this lie all week.....

Yes, we know, you nuts jiggered the incident count around until you got the numbers you wanted.

Nope.....gang bangers at a party shooting each other is not a mass shooting by anyone's understanding of a mass shooting.....and that is most of that list at shooting tracker...

That is why we don't trust anti gunners.....they lie all the time and they lie without hesitation and they do it proudly.....

Define a 'mass shooting' and then prove that it's the universally accepted, official definition.

 

[2aguy]

The US has had over 350 mass shootings THIS YEAR!!! France, two, maybe 3?
Proving once again that real gun laws work.

HUH????????????????????????????????

Earth. We're talking about Earth. Not your parallel universe.

Sheesh. Who ARE you people?

Got no real comeback? Figures.

More people have been killed or injured in mass shootings in France in 2015 alone than were in the USA over the last 7 years combined, how's that for a bitch slapping. Oh that's going to leave a mark.

it is going to get worse.......and it will happen all across Europe.....and then what will they say when their gun confiscation, their extreme gun control laws do nothing to stop increasing gun violence....