NuclearWinter
Rookie
- Apr 13, 2006
- 1,878
- 23
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1,401
This is completely understandable. Also, it sheds new light on the use of the Zodiac. Before the first cataclysm, the Zodiac went from the star sign Libra to Leo (Libra-->Virgo-->Leo). In Leo, the Earth's surface changed drastically: landmasses sank below the sea, new islands arose, volcanoes erupted, and so on. Everything had quieted down, it seemed that a large turnabout in the precession had taken place: it now went the other way around! In other words, a certain mechanism in the interior of the Earth had turned upside down. That made the movement go as follows: Leo-->Virgo-->Libra.
Before the Cataclysm of 9792 BC the Zodiac travelled from Aquarius to Leo. It then stopped abruptly. The magnetic field of the Earth again changed, the inner core began to rotate in the opposite direction and the Zodiac again appeared to have shifted direction. That's the movement we're still following now until the next Pole-Shift.
The indications are overwhelming and at the same time imply a warning for us: it has happened many times before and it will take place again very soon and perhaps in the future after that innumerable times as well.
Before the Cataclysm of 9792 BC the Zodiac travelled from Aquarius to Leo. It then stopped abruptly. The magnetic field of the Earth again changed, the inner core began to rotate in the opposite direction and the Zodiac again appeared to have shifted direction. That's the movement we're still following now until the next Pole-Shift.
The indications are overwhelming and at the same time imply a warning for us: it has happened many times before and it will take place again very soon and perhaps in the future after that innumerable times as well.